Plans for new high street continue slowly but steadily
Highlights of the recent Brentford High Street Steering Group follow. If you would like to learn more about what's going on, have any comment or would like to help, please email the editor or post on the forum. Andrew Dakers can be contacted on 07788 116159 or via email at andrew.dakers@blueyonder.co.uk
Land acquisition and consolidation  
One  of the major barriers to implementing a "comprehensive" scheme on the  South Side of Brentford High Street has been fragmented land  ownership.  Consolidation has been ongoing for around 15-20  years!  There are now just a few pockets of land where Ballymore/  Geronimo continue to be in discussion with various landowners.  The  time these discussions are taking to conclude is extremely frustrating  to the local community.  One piece of land, County Parade, is owned by  the Council.  In the circumstance where the Council supported a scheme  brought forward by developers including the County Parade site - and a  financial agreement was concluded - then it would seem to be very  likely that the County Parade site would also be included in the  rebuild.  Land disputes are now largely resolved. 
      
Compulsory Purchase Orders 
In  the Brentford Area Action Plan (BAAP) the Council has committed to  using Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs), if any pockets of land need to  be acquired to enable a scheme supported by the Council to progress.   Unfortunately CPOs as a route to completing land acquisition can take  many years.  My personal view is that I hope fair deals are found for  the land sellers, purchasers and the surrounding community.  The higher  the land price rises the more development pressure this will put on the  site and then infrastructure (health, schools etc) used by the local  community, which would be unfortunate. 
Design/ planning permission In 2007 the High Street Steering Group completed an innovative, award winning community visioning project which considered all aspects of the sustainable regeneration of our town centre and set out 114 recommendations by which any scheme brought forward by developers should be assessed. We are very frustrated that despite several promises, the developers Geronimo/ Ballymore have yet to bring forward their scheme for review by local councillors and the wider community. We understand their initial scheme concept - referenced in Estates Gazette and displayed on their architect BDP's website briefly - was not particularly well received when presented to The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). The site is also at high risk of flooding which means that plans must be supported by the Environment Agency. This is another major challenge for the developers.
At a meeting of Isleworth & Brentford Local Area Committee (IBAC) on 22 January 2009 Mr Jordan advised IBAC councillors: "A recent meeting was held with David Lunts, Homes and Communities Agency (HCA), at which this site was raised. Hounslow would be meeting the Agency again to discuss the delivery of a number of large sites within the Brentford area.... Mike Jordan suggested that the HCA was the partner to engage with and noted the housing emphasis in their agenda. He added that as ever, early progress would be impossible without a consensus among the Authority/ HCA and the developer, Ballymore as to what form the regeneration would take.... The Authority was promoting the phased rebuilding of the Town Centre to a human scale, as finance for an incremental approach may be more accessible in the current economic climate. Officers supported having a master plan but acknowledged that it could be implemented in phases. Discussions with Ballymore this week suggested the company was moving towards a phased approach – either due to “credit crunch” or due to the asking price for the remaining parcels of land. Mike Jordan acknowledged that some things would be harder to achieve using an incremental approach, such as a Waterman’s replacement....Mike Jordan indicated that the developer had instructed architects to resume work on the project and was anticipated to approach the Authority in the coming weeks with a phased proposal, reflecting the current economic mood."
In a letter to local councillors on 12 June 2009 (and then repeated in Steering Group/ Brentford Chamber meeting at Watermans, 15 June 2009) Ballymore set out how in recent months they have been: undertaking an initial consultation exercise with key stakeholders; are planning a drive about to visit other London sites with similar characteristics to Brentford High Street; will spend 2 days canvassing views on the High Street; will run a community consultation event to help prioritise issues and inform the masterplan brief; and work to deliver a programme of temporary uses on site. Ballymore say they are: "Keen to bring forward development on the site...[develop] a masterplan brief... [However, in common with most we] are in the hands of our funders who will provide the several million pounds of finance needed to deliver an acceptable scheme to planning permission... we cannot guarantee this will happen in the short to medium term."
The High Street Steering Group are continuing to monitor whether sufficient Council officer time is being given to progressing this vital regeneration project.
Investment
  None of the above will happen without continued investment.  The total  development cost is likely to be in the region of £200m (approx figure  drawn from modelling behind Brentford High Street: The Community Vision report  - Nov 2007).  Whilst we have been frustrated at some aspects of how the  process has progressed to date (too many shops remain boarded up, older  buildings are not being well cared for, and one of our boatyards is  closed) we welcome Geronimo/ Ballymore's readiness to invest in  Brentford.   However local peoples' frustration with the painfully slow  progress and visible development blight is once again rising.  Particularly  given the current economic climate, we welcome steps being taken by LB  Hounslow and Ballymore to explore engaging HCA as a development  partner, and the initial consultation that Ballymore has started (April  09).  
June 23, 2009
| 
 |