Manderson House Plan Approved at Another Fractious Meeting
Councillors and rival developer express concerns about the scheme
A visualisation of the Makers' Yard scheme from the developer
June 19, 2023
A planning application in Brentford that received 21 objections and staunch opposition from a rival developer has been approved by Hounslow Council. The development of Manderson House on Commerce Road to be known as Maker’s Yard will provide 111 new flats as well as commercial space in keeping with the area.
Despite the housing officer’s recommendation for approval, the development, which will have two buildings between 8 and 9 stories high, seemed to have its future hanging in the balance for much of the committee meeting due to a number of objections and concerns raised by both councillors and members of the public. A key concern for some councillors including Cllr Raghwinder Siddhu, Cllr Tony Louki and Cllr Alan Mitchell was to do with the percentage of affordable houses the project would provide.
The council’s target for new developments is 40 per cent however Manderson House will only have 27 per cent as part of its affordable housing offering which was described to be the “maximum reasonable within the viability context” by the council officer. In other words, it wasn’t financially viable for the developer to make more houses affordable.
However, this deeply concerned Cllr Louki who raised the question that if they were to approve the application despite it falling well below affordable housing targets it would encourage other applications of a similar nature, diluting and weakening the council’s affordable housing goals. This was a worry echoed by Cllr Siddhu and Mitchell.
Cllr Louki went further to criticise the dilution of affordable housing targets, asking, “how much of it (affordable housing provision) is shared ownership? We have all gradually decided it’s a racket because when you add in service charges it reduces the value of what you are getting.”
CGI from the developer of the scheme as seen from Commerce Road
Discussions around affordable housing only became more pointed when the key objector to plans was given the floor. Grant Leggett from Boyer Planning, said that Manderson House had been “badly designed” and that he felt that the committee had been “misled” about the plans.
Mr Leggett said he had a major problem with windows on the south side of the proposed building which he said would make it impossible for his own client to develop his own housing project. He argued that, Bridge House, which is in the pre-application process would have to reduce the number of homes provided by the scheme from 69 to 14, while if Manderson House removed its windows the drop in housing units for the projected would be much less.
He argued that therefore the overall increase in housing in the borough would come from Manderson House changing its design. Councillors’ ears really perked up when Mr Leggett said that the plan for the 69 flats was for the entire number to be affordable.
However, councillors were reminded that Manderson House had to be judged on its own merits and not on the basis of a hypothetical affordable housing development that was not yet ready to go to committee. Cllr John Stroud-Turp said that Mr Leggett’s comments that the housing officers had ‘misled’ the committee was ‘intemperate’ while Cllr John Todd called it “a load of waffle”.
The applicant’s advocate echoed this saying he was “shocked by the criticism which is completely unfounded and completely unreasonable”. He also added that there was no need for Manderson House to reduce the number of units it offered and that Mr Leggett has created a “false jeopardy”.
The panel voted to approve the construction with Cllr Raghwinder Siddhu, Cllr Tony Louki and Cllr Alan Mitchell being the only councillors to oppose the application.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |