Forum Topic

Anti berk clear front page post

That's it really

Bob Crongle ● 4039d32 Comments

No

Bob Crongle ● 4035d

HahahahaStill waiting to hear what bet it is you spake of.Robin Taylor eh?I'll give you £1000 against your £20 that I am not he.Go on, go on. You know you want to (but won't)

Bob Crongle ● 4035d

this is the one above - so BUMP and does it bump the intended down?

Trudie Fuller ● 4038d

Jim Lawes ● 4038d

"Messing up existing threads is stupid."Normally yes - but if it serves the purpose of getting inane racist rants bounced down  and off the page??  Why not?

Steve Taylor ● 4038d

The existing threads, using the 'bump' method stay in order and are not pushed down the page.Still, never mind Bob, you are king of your own little world; although only having yourself as a subject must be terribly daunting.Therefore, as it is unfair to engage you in debate for fear that it may somehow cause you harm, I shall leave you to your personal bliss.Have a wonderful day in the Kingdom of Cronglestan

Nigel Brooks ● 4038d

Harry Hill moment, "I like Bob and I like Keith, but which is best? FIGHT!!!!"

Steve Bullman ● 4038d

Idiot.Messing up existing threads is stupid.I don't wish to follow your inane instructions.

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

"Jesus, how thick can one guy be haha"Dunno Bob, looked in the mirror this morning?Post on the threads BELOW that's, just for you Bob B...E...L...O...W..That 'demotes' the thread from the page.Starting empty thread is just annoying and, dare I say, stupid.

Nigel Brooks ● 4038d

"Self-defeating surely?"Mmm - interesting

Steve Taylor ● 4038d

Just as an explanation, both of your suggested methods will knock Ifty's posts down.Also, Bob, if that's your intention then why have you now bumped one of Ifty's threads? Self-defeating surely?

Greg Walker ● 4038d

Jim Lawes ● 4038d

FO yourself

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

That one says it for me.Ha ha ha

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Foo you tooJeez, some people

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Sorry that should read FO taylor.

Keith Iddon ● 4038d

But then you disrupt the forum you fool.A new thread with clear instructions doesn't hurt or inconvenience anyone

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

FO

Keith Iddon ● 4038d

About as dense as you appear to be.You don't have to post a new thread you moron, just add a post to an existing thread below the one you want to lower.FGS someone else tell this fool.

Keith Iddon ● 4038d

You are an idiot. You have to post a new thread, then it comes up above.Jesus, how thick can one guy be haha

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

FFS BOB IF YOU DON'T WANT TO MAKE A NEW THREAD YOU CAN POST ON ONE BELOW HIS TO RAISE THAT THREAD ABOVE HIS. IF YOU POST ON ONE ALREADY ABOVE HIS NOTHING WILL HAPPEN.

Keith Iddon ● 4038d

Keith, you have trouble with the basics.Any new thread above his pushes him down.Let me explain that more clearly....ANY NEW THREAD ABOVE PUSHES HIM DOWN.Come on man.....

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Er...No, any new THREAD  knocks it down and any post on a THREAD below his also.If you POST on a THREAD already above his the positions stay the same.I would draw you a diagram if I could...

Keith Iddon ● 4038d

and it simply disrupts genuine posters if you mess with existing threads

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Er wrong.Any new post knocks previous posts down one

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Er ..wrong...it only drops it down if you post on a thread below his and bring the thread you post on to the top of the tier or make a new thread which then appears at the top.That's how it works.

Keith Iddon ● 4038d

and by doing it on threads of interest you will simply annoy genuine posters

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Makes no difference above or below - it steps it down by one

Bob Crongle ● 4038d

Really sorry if it sets anyone (Ifti excepted) but I have just bumped all of the threads below his latest racist ramblings.

Nigel Brooks ● 4039d

Easier to post on a thread below his.

Keith Iddon ● 4039d

Others welcome to post their own sweet nothings :)

Bob Crongle ● 4039d

It's going to take a while at this rate, Bob.

Susan Kelly ● 4039d