Forum Topic

“Instead expect such claims to be made during the last stages of the campaign when, she will figure, resident activists will not have the time or the resources to issue a rebuttal.  After all, as she has told us herself, we may call it dishonesty but to her it is only politics.”The  sad thing is that since Ruth Cadbury’s recommended  expansion of the site which went ahead in 2010, residents had to endure increased odour throughout the upgrade. Residents were assured by the Council that following the upgrade the site would be odour neutral. Residents endured the misery given the assurance by Ruth Cadbury that there was light at the end of the tunnel.  History has shown that the light went out and Councillors,  who backed Ruth Cadbury’s proposal,  scarpered. They were in fact sold a pup by Ms Cadbury who manipulated the SDC for reasons known only to her. Everyone is aware that the upgrade has been a total failure as far as raw sewage discharge to river and odour is concerned. Residents complain of almost daily odour in Twickenham Road these days.  Residents have not enjoyed an odour free Easter break for years. I suspect that this year will be same old, same old.  Residents will go to the polls with the full knowledge of who proposed the site expansion and who has done nothing to correct this stupid, stupid decision to allow Thames Water to go ahead with the upgrade despite all the evidence that was being presented within the charges of negligence and mismanagement at Mogden,  18 of which were found by a High Court Judge to be justified.I too look forward to John Todd's comments on how he will assist Mary Macleod and residents to deal with Thames Water! 

Steve Taylor ● 4039d

This is what I dislike the most about politicians, they treat with the utmost contempt the very people they aspire to represent.John Todd has put a lot of his personal time and effort into baiting the residents who are suffering the effects of Mogden and has now been completely wrong-footed by events.  His "response", if one can call it that, is to fall silent and hope that nobody notices.Ruth Cadbury in the meantime will be aware that the expansion which she more than any other elected member was keen to foist on residents at that now notorious planning meeting in 2009 has not delivered the reduction in odour that she confidently declared it would.It is self-evident that either Ruth was sold a pup by Hounslow's planning officers when she agreed to lead for Thames Water at that meeting, or else she was selling a similarly sized pup to her gullible committee colleagues.  Either way she owes the residents one big fat apology but will we be hearing of it?  Absolutely not.  Instead she is keeping her head down and will doubtless be hoping this will not be a big enough issue with enough local voters to sway the election in May.Thus far she has not issued any published material announcing that she has always opposed the expansion and has been leading the fight on the residents' behalf, but that is because she knows that if she does so it will be actively countered by those who are aware of the truth.  Instead expect such claims to be made during the last stages of the campaign when, she will figure, resident activists will not have the time or the resources to issue a rebuttal.  After all, as she has told us herself, we may call it dishonesty but to her it is only politics.The more one sees of these people in action the more tempting it must be to put a political match to the whole seedy lot of them.

Phil Andrews ● 4041d