Forum Topic

As I have made clear already this is not an issue which I feel as passionately about as some.  Possibly the somewhat over-exuberant flag-waving of my earlier years has left me psychologically damaged in this respect (he said in jest), who knows?However it is clear from the reaction of the general public that most local people, from all backgrounds, consider the rejection by the Hounslow Labour Group of Cllr. Vaught's motion to have been totally unreasonable.Also, notwithstanding Val's comments, it is clear from David Hughes' remarks on the W4 forum that fear of encouraging the far-right by displaying the flag outside the Civic Centre was at least a consideration for some in taking the decision to reject the motion.Now, here's a multiple choice question for our esteemed council leadership:Had there been an active BNP unit locally, would it have beena) More likely, orb) Less likelyto have gained from the publicity and general furore which have resulted from the Labour Group's decision than it would have been from the flag simply being flown in the first place without all this fuss?Now here's another multiple choice question, this time for other readers of the forum.  Considering the likely answer to the above question, did members of the Labour Group nevertheless reject the motiona) Because they are congenitally stupid, orb) Because the truth is that despite their protestations they do not really give a monkey's whether the BNP gains a foothold in Hounslow or not, indeed some limited activity by organised racist groups provides them with a valuable opportunity to sell themselves to potential voters as the defenders of the threatened minority communities?Tempting though it is to go for (a), my own personal experience over nearly three decades compels me to opt for (b).What do others think?

Phil Andrews ● 7389d

Mark, I think the point should be that we should be wresting the symbol of the flag,either the St. George flag or the Union flag from the grimy clutches of the NF/BNP. Let them use the swastika or invent their own standard.My father and several of his brothers,and I'm sure this applies to the relatives of some of those reading this fought bravely for our rights of freedom of expression.The women and children at home also went through horrors of deprevation and anguish,not knowing where the next meal was coming from or whether they would be bombed out of their homes or when their loved ones might be killed or maimed.      My father,rest his soul, would be horrified and angry that the flag of England or Britain would be purloined by fascist thugs for the purpose of gaining credibility.      But to not fly the flag is wrong in the extreme,as it alienates the very people that are the main fabric of English society and the message sent by these idiots at the civic is'we are not going to allow you to be proud of your nation on it's day of celebration,because we think that it would be difficult for us to justify this to ethnic minority members of the electorate,so they might not vote for us if we did this'. Never mind that if millions had not stuck up for this flag and what it stands for, that this would ,in no way ,have become a multi-cultural society and they would not have been here to 'object'.     I'd wager that the majority in the ethnic communities would have no objection whatsoever to a St.George's day celebration.It's like those idiots who want to remove all reference to Jesus at Christmas time on the grounds that it may offend muslims.How can you celebrate someone's birthday without honouring them?Why don't they think it would offend christians if Jesus were not referred to?    All this smacks of the small mindedness of the petty lot at the civic who are so much in their own 'bubble'that they can't see that we have gone past their level of understanding on this sort of issue. They are years behind,in my opinion,stuck in a discredited mode of though. They are trying,bless them, to be so 'right on' that they are 'right off' the mark.

Keith Iddon ● 7390d

JohnYou are absolutely correct to say that in the 1970s the NF used the Union Flag.  In the 1980s it was either the Union Flag or the Celtic Cross depending on which faction one happened to be a part of, but that's another story.  I don't know which flag the BNP uses these days, but there has certainly been a "rediscovery" of the St. George's Flag by English people in general, most evidently during sporting events.To my knowledge there is no significant BNP presence anywhere in this borough.  If there had been they would be shouting about it, because that is the nature of such groups.  There will always be one or two idiots who will put up posters or paint slogans, and one or two is all it needs.  As for such things as street newspaper sales, these are often undertaken by travelling teams.  As such I don't buy the "encouraging the BNP" argument, however this whole issue is not one sue which I have particularly strong feelings about one way or the other.I believe this to be wholly or in part an election stunt, based on the (in my opinion mistaken) view that people from ethnic and cultural minorities will be impressed.  It also occurred to me that the Labour leadership was hoping to provoke a jingoistic response from its opponents in the hope that minorities would as a result feel alienated from them, but just possibly I am crediting said leadership with too much intelligence.  That said, somebody gave the story to the paper and did so, presumably, for a reason.It is an interesting debate, but way down on my list of priorities I am afraid.  The Tories might prove a better option.

Phil Andrews ● 7396d