Forum Topic

John Thank you for your response. Having seen for myself how some New Labour councillors operate, and in that I mean several of those of the Feltham mafia and others, I was sorry to read of your expulsion. I was however aware that a very dirty and very public campaign had been launched against you by certain local New Labour party officials. I can only assume that you were too good at what you were doing and therefore far too much of a threat to those who lack political accountability for you to stay within the party. Had the leadership of the local New Labour group been in possession of any sense they would have censured those party officials and councillors who are bringing the party down brick by brick rather than letting them get away with slow and painful ruination, which is what some of these recent issues seem that the New Labour group are hell bent on doing. If your concerns on the way that the party is operating locally have not been picked up by New Labour locally, regionally or indeed nationally, then it seems to me that locally, regionally and nationally, New Labour are more than happy to condone the antics of a number of rather idiosyncratic party officials and councillors which I can only suppose that Alan and Ann Keen are more than happy to support. The support from the Keen’s would appear to be rather short sighted in that if the local party are deemed to be out of touch with the electorate, coupled with voter disillusionment on several fronts on national and international issues, then surely the chances of re-election by Alan Keen and Ann Keen must be diminished. Outside of the General Election, in the Local Election, through these recent local events there exists a very real chance of a large number of wards within the borough being effectively taken out of the control of New Labour with New Labour losing seats in the east of the borough and in turn, New Labour potentially losing overall control of the borough. The way in which certain of these branches operate seems ludicrous in that if the membership of these branches are not genuine New Labour supporters and have no interested in politics but are only shipped in to rubber stamp nominations for ward councillors, the nominations of which may or may not reflect the make up of the electorate, then New Labour deserve the ward councillors these branches back if indeed the wards return such New Labour councillors. Such antics won’t work in the long term because these undemocratic machinations disillusion genuine party supporters who have a very real passion for politics, fractionalising support, leading to a weaker overall party. Hardly the vision that New Labour needs or one that Tony Blair keeps telling us that he wants. Talk of social exclusion at its worse.

Gareth Evans ● 7366d

Having recently been ejected from the Labour Group I will not comment on that organisation for now. As to the local party, a number of formerly active Labour Party branches have ceased to function. Although some of these branches have memberships measured in the hundreds many of those on the membership role have no interest in the Party and are there solely to support the councillors who recruited them. Branches hold an annual general meeting at which officers and delegates are elected - usually including a councillor as secretary - and are then inactive for the forthcoming year.As a councillor for Hounslow Heath ward I have not even received an invitation to an AGM for at least 4 years. As a member of Heston Central I have attended the annual farce that goes by the name of an AGM and no other meetings for years. I have been effectively excluded from internal Labour Party debate throughout this period.Feltham and Heston Constituency Labour Party at one point had a massive membership, 90%+ (I think) were allegedly unwaged. If you are signing up supporters it was much cheaper to recruit them at the unwaged rate!Selections for the 2006 Council elections are due soon. In many wards membership soared in the run-up. Only members on the lists before 31st January 2004 will be allowed to vote. This favours certain councillors and makes it difficult for others as well as potential newcomers. Genuine Labour Party members who are interested in discussing government policies etc. are thus effectively excluded, while genuine new members are banned from full participation (which would be the case if they lived elsewhere) in the Party.The London Labour Party has consistently ignored all requests to clean up the mess. Their motives for this stance are unclear.

John Connelly ● 7366d