Forum Topic

As if the ongoing palaver with youngest son's DBS certificate wasn't enough, we now have a right old cock-up with the oldest too! He got a sparkling new DBS in April after a tortured tale where the school he worked at filled in the form incorrectly to start with, having corrected it they then submitted another form. That took from last November.Having been made redundant in February he has been applying for jobs, mostly through agencies, fine all well and good until last week. He signed with an agency who of course asked for all the normal stuff plus the new DBS, great er - no! The agency called to tell him the DBS was wrong! And when we checked they were right - DBS for some reason had left off one of his forenames, so we checked his old certificate (from 2011) and sure enough that was the same! Having 'phoned the DBS service they just said well you'll just have to cough up for a new one - £56. The thing is that these people are supposed to check all your information, as do the police and they have therefore issued a certificate to all intents and purposes, to someone who doesn't exist! When my son called DBS back to advise the previous certificate was also incorrect they were a bit taken aback, as well they might be, so they climbed down off their high horse and agreed to raise a query and said they would write to him. So it would seem either the person who filled in the original form got it wrong or the DBS/police don't actually check every application properly. I really don't think that it is fair to expect my son to have to pay for something that was not his fault, it seems to be an 'official error'. But once again it does show up the farce of this unwieldy, expensive waste of time, who would be safeguarded if this is an example of their 'checking'?

Vanessa Smith ● 3869d

Just when you think you've heard it all something else comes that is so pathetic you wonder how anyone has the sheer effrontery to say it to you, clearly this does not faze the DBS service. In reply to my son's application for redress, they are laying the blame completely on the Metropolitan Police and deny any maladministration on their part! They accept that the police went way over the top breaching the service level agreement on checking times between the DBS and the police by 18 days, but, even though my son chased them after the 60 day deadline all the DBS would do is WRITE to the police and give them another 10 days!! If that's not maladministration then God alone knows what is. They did nothing to ensure that the SLA between the two services was adhered to but miraculously no-one can be blamed. The second howler was the police claim they were first of all 'unsure' if the record they found belonged to my son then they sent it to the local police to check and they said they found 'potential alias data' on their database. As it happens my son has 3 forenames, two of which are not common, and they expect him to believe that they found others with these names? Not in this world, it's absolute rubbish.So now it's all been blamed on the Met and sent to them, no doubt for yet more official buck passing, the fact that people get caught in this idiocy trying to work doesn't seem to count for anything. This will go on, if these morons think they can give people the bum's rush and just walk away they are sadly mistaken.

Vanessa Smith ● 3873d