Forum Topic

It was indeed an idiotic and spiteful comment, and am I alone in rueing what seems to have become of the Jim we all knew and loved since he became involved with "that" lot?I'm not sure I agree though that we have "been here before".  If we are referring to the Michael Foot era I do feel the Corbyn program is more in tune with the modern age and less doctrinaire - it isn't even all that radical (surveys suggest that the renationalisation of the railways, for instance, is supported by voters from across the board - even Tories).  It is simply that the political class today has accepted the basic premises of Thatcherism to such a degree that anything significantly to its left is considered off limits.Historians who point to Foot's heavy election defeat in 1983 also tend to ignore the impact of the Falklands War on that result.  Before that happened many pundits were predicting a Labour victory.  History can be cruel and unforgiving.With the widespread acceptance of neoliberal ideas Labour has in my view lost all sense of purpose.  One only has to look at what we have in Isleworth, or for that matter the local leadership, to see what power for its own sake and without ideals looks like.Corbyn may not be the best man to change all that.  But he is the only one with his name in the hat who gives any indication of even wanting to.  Like you I am not a member and don't have a vote, but even I have found myself enthused by the Corbyn challenge.  Sadly I am of the firm belief that it will end in tears, but this is one of those occasions when I would be truly happy to be proved wrong.

Phil Andrews ● 3629d