Forum Topic

Gareth, I agree with you.The banner headlines are not worth the paper they are written on, even if it is the cheapest quality!  (posh paper does not make important words, methinks.)I want to understand the thinking behind the banner topic headlines, to see if I agree with them, and if they agree with what I really want addressed.  I don't need a party political statement about for example, Policing - I need to know what that means here on the ground.For example – banner headline – "Violent crime is up by 30% since 1997.  We will give the Met an extra 8,539 to make the local streets safer."Does somebody feel that they are in a position to brag that Violent crime is up by 30%?  Would this be to make me frightened?  Or would it be to blind me with statistics so that I don’t ask any more?  I feel completely numb to statistics.  It is a bit like the children are being brought up numb to horror and violence because of what they see in the media around them.  It is a completely novel concept that I used to hide behind a pillow when the Cybermen were in a Dr Who episode, they are rarely frightened by the horror on TV.The statement says that this rise in violent crime is since 1997.  I wonder, if I bothered to think about it, why 1997?  Bet the bobby on the beat and their family and the people trapped in their homes at night, frightened to go out, are more concerned with the here and now, so what is happening, now?If the party line then continued in its boast that they will give the Met an extra 8,539, to make our local streets safer – I might say what does this mean?You might give the Met another 5 officers, or another 50,000, so why 8,539?  What will they be used to do – I mean, will they be an investment in the fabric of our society, or will they all become traffic officers in the war against the car?What has our Police Chief (newly into his role, with bags of experience, and who is no doubt looking with his colleagues at what is going on and has a fair idea from the front line people what needs to be done) got to say about this?  How many officers will he need?  How many will he get?  Will these be in addition to the ones leaving the force?  How will he want to use them?  Does he think that this is they way to fight crime, or are there other solutions which need to be knitted together to help find the solution?  Is there a solution?What about the outgoing Police Chief?  What would he say about his work in the Borough?  How many extra trained officers with people experience, would he have liked?What WOULD the bobby on the beat say?

Sarah Felstead ● 7326d

I have just received an election letter from Labour - Ann Keen.It is headed "Ann Keen MP - A report to my constituents, February 2005."If it is a request for my support as a voter, then it completely misses the mark!If it is a boast of how you might hob nob with other people and piggy back onto other issues, run by other organisations, then it could be a fair advert for those?There does not appear to be one single local issue which, is driven or campaign owned by our MP?Maybe I am being mean, forgive me.  I really do not understand how any of this, so called, democratic process works.  I cannot fathom out how the local Council works.  I understand how I THINK it should work, but in actual practise it takes an elderly lady to fall, to get anyone to tackle an issue such as broken paving slabs - and the actual issues around the cracked pavement are not at all resolved! - so how can I possibly expect to understand how an MP fits into this peculiar system?This Borough really needs a strong leader to represent us who understands the area and its components and who is prepared to work hard to reverse its decline.This Borough really needs a strong leader who can help support some real changes to the quality of how the area knits together, before it goes down the pan.This Borough really needs a strong leader who is not afraid to stand on their own two feet nor is afraid not to dance to a Party political line, which we have no say in.Having read the Labour flyer - it makes the Conservative one even worse than I previously thought, because the flyer is no competition for the right person....Now I really do need a cup of tea.

Sarah Felstead ● 7327d

The only labour campaign(?) letter I have received is a letter from Ann Keen through my sons school.Why has this information been sent out in such a costly fashion?  Why wouldn't it be in the child benefit letters being sent out?  If it were sent out with the child benefit letters you could actually target the age ranges who might be interested for future reference, and those in the age range who might qualify.  Hopefully the amazing child benefit computer will already store information about people who receive this written word in larger letters, braille, or other languages, and this information would then be written appropriately?The letter is on House of Commons paper - luxury quality (thick paper) ... they don't do a cheaper version for circular letters?.The paper is cream coloured with a green ink raised crest and a raised House of Commons address also in green ink.  Ann Keen's personal parts of the heading and footing address, are in flat green ink.The rest of the letter is in a huge font size (to lay out the information to fill the A4 sheet) with Re:  The Education Maintenance Allowance, and ANN KEEN MP in bold ink.The quality paper is also watermarked with a House of Commons crest.  Maybe I am being picky but seeing as I am charged with buying the printer paper and ink cartridges in this house, I kind've notice how quickly the costs mount up, and how quickly the ink and paper runs out.  I have one comparable pile of quality paper which I hide away from the children, and I have used just a few sheets for important business in a few years.  For the less important stuff I use run-of-the-mill 80g or some 90g stuff.  I worry when the ink costs outweigh or match the costs of buying a new printer - perhaps some rising MP could take this matter up for me? - perhaps you might also tuck in making some sense of the prices of optical glasses and drum kits, at the same time? - all of which have perplexed me in recent weeks.Is this the same letter received by other schools, or have all schools been targeted, in the same way, with different letters?This letter was distributed through Isleworth & Syon School.  I don't know the age range it was given to - it does suggest that 50% of the 16 - 18 years olds will not be eligible for the allowance, so that possibly means 50% of the letters sent in this format, will be wasted?  As we are in a London Borough, this may mean a higher percentage wasted?ANN KEEN MP FOR BRENTFORD AND ISLEWORTHCRESTHOUSE OF COMMONSLONDON SW1A 0AA15TH MARCH 2005Dear Parent,Re:  The Education Maintenance AllowanceMembers of Parliament have been asked to update parents regarding a new government policy that may be of benefit to you and your family.The Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) is designed to encourage students to stay in school beyond the age of 16.  Depending on household income, students enrolled in school or college after they have reached 16 years old can receive up to £30 a week in order to continue their studies.  There are also bonuses of £100 given out in January and July should students require them.Roughly half of England’s students between the ages of 16 and 18 are eligible for the EMA.  If you wish to seek more information on eligibility and how much your child/children are entitled to, then you can visit www.dfes.gov.uk or call 0845 60 222 60 in order to request a copy of a booklet which explains everything.If I can be of assistance with this or any other matter please do not hesitate to contact me in writing or on 020 7219 5623.Yours sincerely SignedANN KEEN MPRepresenting the people of Hounslow, Osterley, GunnersburyBrentford, Isleworth and Chiswickannkeenmp@parliament.uk

Sarah Felstead ● 7327d

Charles I’m with you on many aspects of your postings. I too have voted Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem in general elections over the years. I’ve also voted Labour, Lib Dem and ICG in local elections. This time around unlike the last general election, I won’t be supporting Ann Keen from the viewpoint of my belief that she has done almost nothing locally to warrant my vote for her. She may claim credit for a great many things but most of what she claims credit for I expect as a matter of course from a committed MP, which by the way I don’t see her as being, and from the government. I can’t see myself voting for the Conservative candidate Alexander Northcote because I don’t believe that the Conservatives under Michael Howard have the best interests of the country at heart. Yes, I want a tougher stance taken by government on crime and disorder but I don’t want cuts in public services because we all to some extent or other depend on them. The Conservatives past examples of cutting costs left us with among other things the now discredited Care in the Community initiative where those among society who previously needed and were given support were left to their own devices, sometimes with catastrophic results not only for themselves but also in many cases, for others. I equally don’t see the Conservative policy of attacking just about everyone who comes to this country to fulfil a role that indigenous people either won’t or can’t fulfil, helpful to anyone.  I’m left with the Lib Dem, ICG, Green Party or any other candidates not mentioned above. The events and campaigning of the next few weeks will be crucial in making my mind up, I know this much.

Gareth Evans ● 7332d