Forum Topic

Several things struck me about last night's programme, the complete acceptance by the Director of Housing that councils were pretty dependant on the private sector and nothing was going to change, and the appalling state that even Environmental health officers were prepared to leave people in. Even though that 'bed in a shed' hadn't been built properly the landlord seemed to get away with providing a couple of electric fires instead of addressing the building issues! Why aren't councillors and council officers up in arms and protesting and making representation through regional and national associations about this dreadful state of affairs? Let's not forget that a lot of private landlords are in receipt of a massive chunk of the benefits bill via housing benefit - that means you and me, why aren't the government tackling this if they're so intent on getting the benefits bill down?The other thing that took my breath away was the landlord, Ali, who really believed that allowing garages and sheds to be used to house people was the answer. Even though I thought that tenant who landed up in court was a complete plank, I did note the Bentley the poor old landlord was driving around in.  As for the moron who'd spent all that money on a wedding - ironic to say the least that they got a decent flat and the newly-weds were coming back to it as well. Judging by the antics of some tenants featured in the 'Council House Crackdown' programme I do wonder how much checking Hounslow does to ensure that the people living in their properties are the rightful tenants?

Vanessa Smith ● 3354d

Some great examples last night of how messed up the system is from top to bottom.Hounslow has approximately 500 beds in sheds despite years of enforcement (which of course I've got first hand experience in) against such accommodation.  Clearly the deterrents/penalties aren't sufficient, and a considerable proportion of the landlords have this mentality that because some people can't afford private rent levels, they should be happy to live anywhere, whilst the landlords drive their Bentleys...And the concept of Councils paying incentives to landlords to house people is just absurd.  Particularly when the tenant in that case that just spent £10,000 on his daughter's wedding, which was completely reckless and irresponsible.The whole system is simply crazy and isn't going to improve because (1) housing in the SE isn't affordable for many people these days, not just the less well-off but those on decent incomes, and rents are so high it's impossible for young people to save up for a deposit without relying on their parents, and (2) the house building market is relatively stable at the moment, yet population growth is happening at a much faster rate through both in-migration into the cities and existing residents having bigger families.The 2nd issue (population growth) is the underlying cause, but no government dare try to tackle that, especially when you have the Turkish PM telling his population to "go forth and multiply".Which, going back to last night's programme, one of the Council Officers hinted at herself when she said something like "they're not the only ones with a child, we have families with more children so they are a greater priority", at which point various four letter terms of abuse spouted from my mouth about how irresponsible it is for anyone to give people the idea that by having more kids they'll become a priority at the expense of any poor sod who doesn't reproduce like a rabbit !.

Adam Beamish ● 3355d

I don't think it is quite that easy Simon but the system sure isn't what it should be.The whole ball game seemed to change last night when the Romanian family brought along documentation from the guy's previous 'dummy run' when he'd been receiving JSA - seemingly if an EU resident has been here for 3 months and either in employment or receiving JSA then that makes them entitled to housing - next thing we the viewer knew this guy was living in a 3 bed house in Birmingham paid for by housing benefit.So basically someone comes over here, claims JSA for 3 months, then brings their family over and hey presto they get a house paid for through housing benefit.  And supposedly that benefit is taken away after 3 months if the main breadwinner hasn't got a job, but I wonder how often the people are evicted, and, even if they are, they've got at least 6 months of financial support from the state.I don't personally attach much greater weight to someone being locally born and bred, and I can't stand the attitude of "I'm British and this is Britain so I deserve priority" (so charmingly displayed by the woman last night who descended into racist abuse), but nonetheless the system makes it far too easy, and the sad thing is, as Bernard and Raymond have both said, it is the most genuine and deserving people that suffer as a consequence.However, in an extremely rare venture to the polling station for me, I will be voting to remain in, primarily because I am far from convinced Britain will be any better off out of the EU, and indeed expect Britain to be far worse off.  Plus as I have always said I think many of the problems the UK faces are nothing to do with the EU but are simply problems of the world we live in - and in particular my continual bugbear of uncontrolled population growth.

Adam Beamish ● 3362d

This just gets worse and is not really putting Hounslow in a good light. Although it is probably just as bad if not worse elsewhere.I've helped a few who have hit rock bottom through no fault of their own. Just bad luck and timing and string of set backs that could befall any of us who don't have resources to fall back on.  Dealing with officials can be really galling, not least because some cannot use basic communication skills. And I suspect most are jaded by the unrelenting tide of the types shown last night who demand, demand and demand.But even as an advocate, removed from the issue, on each occasion it has been embarrassing to observe and get simple facts across.So far only the housing director has come across well. No sign of a valid and able contribution from the Housing portfolio councillors…Yet.But it also reveals who local people born and bred here really are cascaded to the back of the queue, as does anyone who does not push and shove. It's not just Hounslow but Housing Associations, in particular A2Dominion who fail tenants badly and will not deal adequately with those tenants who make lives of those living in the same block a misery, or with the great deal of housing stock that is flawed or below habitable standard.There is a point where local authorities become involved but they are all but hopeless.  Incompetence, indecision, and complete lack of comprehension of what are clear cut issues that can quite easily be solved if only someone would take the plunge and do it.It's only when one digs deeper that the true murk becomes apparent, something a person in need is not likely to do.  The links between officials, both elected and unelected and the boards of the likes of A2D are questionable at the lightest and really need investigating.The profits being made by the same circles out of all this are not just scandalous but clearly close to that of organised crime.When a documentary team get under the skin of that and expose it fully, then we might see some real improvement in quality of life and opportunity for those who deserve and are set back from no fault of their own.The council leaders praise for the staff might be one thing but really a lot of work needs to be done.  No mean task in current times.

Raymond Havelock ● 3362d

Indeed Paul.  Perhaps I'm hard but I was quite annoyed with the priest who seemed to bend over backwards to help them, only for it to finally dawn on him that the family were not deserving of help.  I can't stand this reckless, selfish behaviour from anyone (regardless of their nationality) when they have 5 children and then expect the state to give them everything.The husband had effectively already done a dummy run which hadn't gone well as he hadn't found work and had ended up homeless, so it made absolutely no sense why he'd then go back to Romania and bring the wife and 5 kids.  Although actually it made perfect sense because he knew that one way or another the system would help him, which it duly did when he ended up with a 3 bed house paid for through the state.  And surprise surprise he couldn't get a job, but we all know after 3 months he'll still somehow wangle a continuation of JSA and/or housing benefit, or probably have another child to get more from the state or as a lever to avoid deportation.  How I wish that as soon as the family set foot in the Civic Centre the authorities could detain them and send them immediately back on a plane to Romania, and ideally castrate the husband at the same time !.And before anyone says I'm anti-European, my other half is Slovakian and has been here for 14 years, the difference being she pays her own way in this world.  And it infuriates both of us that the way those Romanians were carrying on means so many genuine people get tarred with the same brush.

Adam Beamish ● 3362d