Forum Topic

So should Curran resign?

Paul Slattery, the anti-wheelie bin campaigner, has made a strongly worded criticism of Hounslow Council's leader after harassment charges against him were dropped.Brentford based Mr Slattery is unhappy with the statement to the police made by Steve Curran and has demanded his resignation as Council Leader. He has also made as complaint to the Police Complaints Authority about the manner of his arrest which he describes as appalling claiming that he was prevented from taking his blood pressure medication.He was joined by over 20 supporters at The Griffin on Friday night as he celebrated his court case being dropped, having been charged with harassment of a person in their own home after a wheelie bin protest outside the home of Steve Curran.The CPS dropped the case after seven months the day before it was due to be heard because "there is not enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction".Paul SlatteryMr Slattery said “There was never any evidence in the first place – all the police had was Curran’s uncorroborated statement. I should never have been arrested, let alone charged. The whole thing has caused me untold stress and has cost the taxpayer tens of thousands of pounds."It has resulted in 8 months of hell for me and coincided with the slow demise this spring of my elderly mother who finally passed away on April 3rd. I had to take care of all the post death formalities and arrange her funeral, at the same time having to deal with this spurious criminal charge hanging over me. I was at her funeral on April 21st and at Uxbridge Court on April 25th to plead not guilty to this disgusting trumped up charge“We were having a peaceful, humorous, and legal protest. Curran could have dealt with this in a diplomatic way but chose anger which was what caused any bad feeling.“All the allegations made against me by Curran have been refuted by at least six witnesses who were there on the night. Curran claims that  'Paul came right up into my personal space'.  This is not the case. Curran arrived in his car just as everyone was about to leave, wound his window down and swore at us. He then parked his car near the football ground entrance and came down the road towards me shouting and swearing. It was he that came up to me, everyone saw him."Curran then says in his statement 'Paul walked in front of me...stopping me from getting into my house'. Curran is a big man; it's hard to walk in front of him. I am heard to say in the video seen by the police 'your choice, If you want to go into your house you can go into your house Steve'. I even have a photograph of Steve Curran between me and his front gate."Further on in his statement Curran says 'I told Paul to remove the bins but he did not'. Again all the witnesses utterly refute this - they all saw myself, John Bradley and others remove the bins."At the end of the statement Curran says 'This incident has frightened my family and caused distress to my wife and son'. The house was completely empty until Curran entered the house."Whilst relieved that the case has been dropped I don't feel it's over. Steve Curran must resign not only as leader of the council but also from his council seat and I shall seek a Labour Party enquiry into his behaviour."I made a complaint to the Police Complaints Authority a matter of days after my arrest: my treatment by them was appalling."When the police officers came to arrest me they refused even to let me urinate, then handcuffed me despite me offering no resistance."In the cell I felt my blood pressure increasing and then realised that I did not have my blood pressure medication. When I saw the doctor he told me that at 180 it was extremely high and he said that my medication would be brought for me."Even though my blood-pressure medication had arrived I was still unable to take it before my interview, and it was only after I had left the police station that I was finally able to take it – a good EIGHT hours after I normally take it AND at a time of very high stress."My treatment by the Hounslow Met both during my arrest and time in police cells was humiliating and degrading and almost certainly contravenes Section 5 of the European Human Rights Convention. I am presently taking legal advice about this.”Nick Kilby who was also there on the night and took video evidence says “the treatment of Paul has been a disgrace and the case should never have been initiated. This shows the contempt Steve Curran has for his fellow neighbours and the citizens of the Borough of Hounslow who he purports to 'lead', as the situation could so easily have been diffused. The continuance of the legal process for 8 months with no evidence to convict is shameful. A waste of public money, police time but worse a nightmare for Paul to live through.”All quotes from Steve Curran are taken from his witness statement which was made the day after the protest, after the article about wheelie bins was published on BrentfordTW8.com on 20th November. Councillor Steve Curran, Leader of Hounslow Council, said: “I would like to reiterate again, that I firmly believe in the right to protest. I know people felt and still feel, very strongly both for and against the introduction of wheelie bins.“There is however, an appropriate way to make your feelings known. The protest which took place outside my home of which I share with my family, I felt was not appropriate. It prevented access in and out of my home and was also not fair on my neighbours.“As Leader of Hounslow Council, I take full responsibility for the decisions we make as a council. Once again, if residents feel strongly about anything, we would welcome them to attend any of these meetings and also contact us as their councillors through the appropriate channels and we would always be more than happy to discuss any concerns they have about the services we provide.”Mr Slattery's solicitor from Bindmans LLP has written a case summary looking at the limits to protesting, finishing off with "Paul Slattery’s case reminds us that all reasonable lines of inquiry should be investigated, charging decisions should be carefully considered, and the CPS must be prepared to review its decisions to prosecute – in accordance with its duty – at an early stage. Otherwise, unnecessary costs are incurred, disproportionate damage is caused to lives, and the freedom of speech is curtailed."

Paul Fisher ● 3312d62 Comments

I rather feel for Guy, he's going to be in the firing line no matter what he posts on this thread, and personally speaking had I been in his shoes I'd have been sorely tempted to remain silent.At the end of the day this was a private matter between Cllr. Curran and Paul Slattery.  Whilst the protest may have related to the Council's implementation of a policy, the consequences were nothing to do with the Council as an organisation or Labour as a party, but solely related to an alleged incident between two local residents.I have said on this thread that in my view Cllr. Curran's position is untenable, simply because his claims doesn't stack up with the evidence of other witnesses, and the extent of the protest/incident seems entirely amenable/humourous/trivial and not remotely threatening, whereas I had also previously said that I had no issue with Cllr. Curran calling the police if he genuinely felt threatened.And having spent lots of time over the yeas out on site visits and encountering some local residents who were perfectly happy to dish out verbal abuse and threats and on occasion physical violence, I know what it's like to be on the receiving end, although I only felt it necessary to involve the police on 1 occasion and on the all the other occasions it was simply water off a ducks back.Personally I felt it was 'madness' for Cllr. Curran to persist with proceedings unless he really had felt threatened, because inevitably he was never going to come out of this well, and to me if I was in his shoes, the last thing I'd want to do is to make a local resident into a 'martyr' unless it really was unavoidable.  But going back to where I started, what more can Guy say ? - if I was in his shoes I might privately have said to Cllr. Curran "are you sure about this given the potential advere consequences ?" but ultimately it's nothing more to do with Guy than it is with you or me, it is simply two local residents involved in a dispute.

Adam Beamish ● 3307d

I wouldn't dignify the contributions from Mr. Ayres which are nasty nonsense. I was actually shaking my head with disbelief when I saw Guy's response, what does the Dear Leader have to do before one of these spineless colleagues of his wakes up to what is going on here? This is about integrity, and quite honestly anyone who can embellish what started out as a fairly good natured attempt to bring concerns to Curran's attention, and make it look like the crime of the century had bog-all little of that. It's not confined to the dear Leader though, no comment has ever been made about one of his acolytes being caught lying through her teeth about a local matter by a simple FOI request. Both these councillors are known to tell locals who contact them for some information/help to stop keep e-mailing them! Perhaps if they tried communicating occasionally people would not feel the need to keep trying to get a response? Similarly with the Wheelie issue, you'd have had to been a real dimwit not to know how that issue was getting up a head of steam in a lot of areas across the borough. Why not address that, why leave it until people got so frustrated they felt compelled to try other means to being this to the attention of the Leader? Ignoring people rarely works, it breeds resentment that people you elected in good faith to represent you have got what they wanted and have decided that they know what is best for the rest of us, and when that doesn't work they lie. Even Guy with his throwaway line of - if he doesn't get re-elected well that's just democracy - hasn't grasped what the real problem is here, it's known as trust. For someone who is supposed to be leading the borough council Curran has shown himself to be an insensitive, arrogant, conceited bully, that any elected member should make excuses for this appalling state of affairs just astounds me.

Vanessa Smith ● 3307d

GuyI have said before that you are different from the others.  Whilst they are happy to keep quiet, remain expressionless and raise their hands idiot-style when thus instructed you always go to some considerable length to see both sides of any situation, subjecting the issue at hand to forensic examination and rigorous scholarly analysis before invariably concluding that your Leader is once again right as always.  As such you lack the totality of arrogance which some of your cohorts exude in such abundance, but it is early days.  You'll pick it up in good time I'm sure.I'm sorry Guy, but it is insulting nonsense for you to suggest or imply that this matter was out of Curran's hands once the police were involved. At any point over the several months in which this case was hanging over Paul he could have expressed his wish that the case against him should be discontinued.  He was, after all, the only witness for the prosecution.  Instead he submitted a witness statement full of inaccuracies, distortions and glaring contradictions in an attempt to talk up the case for the prosecution.  That in the end his testimony did not inspire the prosecution with sufficient confidence to pursue the case is unsurprising, but it reflects no credit whatsoever upon Curran.  He is a nasty, spiteful and insecure bully whose instinct is to use his power and influence to try to silence those he fears the most, which in his case and that of his followers is not his political opponents but everyday members of the community who dare to articulate an opinion.I'm afraid there is no halfway house on this one, no fence to sit on.  His colleagues, and for that matter even his "opponents", who refuse to speak out will be remembered unfondly when this community's favour is sought once again, albeit through gritted teeth I'm sure, in a couple of years' time.  The events which we've been witnessing at Westminster over the past few weeks should tell you that there is no such thing as the certainty of unchallenged, perpetual power in politics.

Phil Andrews ● 3307d

Appalling though it has been, Curran's treatment of Paul Slattery has been by no means the only demonstration that we've been given of this man's unfitness to lead Hounslow Council.Back in April Curran, through his Political Assistant, invited members of the Labour Group to submit expressions of interest in serving on the ruling Cabinet for the coming year.  About three weeks later he wrote to the same members advising them that there had been 15 nominations and attached the forms for all of them to see. He then casually declared his intention to simply continue with the existing members in the interests of "continuity" and to arbitrarily disregard all the new applications which he had received!  In doing so he had clearly misled all his own non-Cabinet colleagues and had pointlessly wasted the time of seven of them who had taken the trouble to submit themselves for consideration.The make-up of Curran's Cabinet - appointed by him - is interesting in itself.  Whilst the Feltham & Heston constituency has 30 Labour councillors and the Brentford & Isleworth constituency only 19, 7 posts on the Cabinet are held by Curran's B&I cronies and only 3 from F&H.  In spite of the Labour Party's oft-stated commitment to equality and diversity there is a clear bias against Black and Minority Ethnic party members, with only 2 Cabinet posts being offered to BME applicants and 8 to councillors who are white.A cursory glance at Curran's appointments makes it utterly obvious that he does not offer promotion on the basis of ability, far less on the basis of personal honesty or integrity.  It is high time that decent members of the Labour Party in Hounslow, and I know there are some, got a grip on this situation.  Muttering "you know what I think" whilst looking to the ground and doing nothing is not an option.  If you are not a part of the solution then you really are a part of the problem - and that goes for the silent "Opposition" every bit as much as for the party in power.

Phil Andrews ● 3309d

Interesting that the Hounslow Code of Conduct does not include several of the items relevant to the Bindmans article.I thought the bits fromhttp://www.hounslow.gov.uk/constitution2015.pdfthat seemed most pertinent were :"Members and co-opted members of the London Borough of Hounslow have a responsibility to represent thecommunity and work constructively with council staff and partner organisations to secure better social, economicand environmental outcomes for all.In accordance with the Localism Act provisions, when acting in this capacity members are committed to behavingin a manner that is consistent with the following principles to achieve best value for residents and maintainpublic confidence in the authority.Selflessness: Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.Integrity: Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people ororganisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act ortake decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or theirfriends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.Objectivity: Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, usingthe best evidence and without discrimination or bias.Accountability: Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actionsand must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.Openness: Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner.Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for sodoing.Honesty: Holders of public office should be truthful.Leadership: Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour. Theyshould actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behaviourwherever it occurs............Members of the London Borough of Hounslow’s conduct will in particular address the statutory principles of thecode of conduct by:Championing the needs of residents – the whole community and in a special way my constituents,including those who did not vote for me - and putting their interests first.Dealing with representations or enquiries from residents, members of our communities and visitorsfairly, appropriately and impartially.Not allowing other pressures, including the financial interests of myself or others connected to me, todeter me from pursuing constituents’ casework, the interests of the London Borough of Hounslow orthe good governance of the authority in a proper manner.Exercising independent judgement and not compromising my position by placing myself underobligations to outside individuals or organisations who might seek to influence the way I perform myduties as a member/co-opted member of this authority.Listening to the interests of all parties, including relevant advice from statutory and other professionalofficers, taking all relevant information into consideration, remaining objective and making decisionson merit.Being accountable for my decisions and co-operating when scrutinised internally and externally,including by local residents.Contributing to making this authority’s decision-making processes as open and transparent as possibleto enable residents to understand the reasoning behind those decisions and to be informed whenholding me and other members to account but restricting access to information when the wider publicinterest or the law requires itBehaving in accordance with all our legal obligations, alongside any requirements contained withinthis authority’s policies, protocols and procedures, including on the use of the Authority’s resources.Valuing my colleagues and staff and engaging with them in an appropriate manner and one thatunderpins the mutual respect between us that is essential to good local government.Always treating people with respect, including the organisations and public I engage with and those Iwork alongside.Providing leadership through behaving in accordance with these principles when championing theinterests of the community with other organisations as well as within this authority.......17. The Monitoring Officer may take the following into account in deciding whether to investigate thecomplaintis the matter serious enough to warrant the time and expense of further investigationdoes the complaint appear to be politically motivateddoes the complaint appear to be malicious, vexatious or otherwise an abuse of the processIs the complaint in respect of a decision of a body, rather than the conduct of a memberis it about something that happened so long ago that there would be little benefit in takingaction nowis the outcome including the availability of any likely sanction sought by the complainantone that the Authority is empowered to deliverif proven, would a finding of breach of the Code assist the Authority in its duty to promoteand maintain high standards of conducthad the Member acted on the advice of an officer or the Independent Person in relation tothe conduct complained ofdid the conduct arise from lack of experience or traininghad the Member apologised for the conduct or was he or she willing to apologiseis the subject matter of the complaint being dealt with through any other complaints, legalor regulatory process....."

Tim Henderson ● 3310d

One can fully understand the sitting on the fence of fellow councillors and the restraint of opposite numbers while the case was pending.But the truth is now out, the witnesses free to talk and the facts are laid out.Certainly Mr Curran, as I've said before, was well within his rights to call the police. Except it was all over in a flash and, true to form, the police turned up way too late.But clearly Mr Curran subsequently either lied to the Police or at the very least laid it on thick, probably to avoid getting a dressing down for wasting Police time. Bullies are usually also Cowards.But who cooked up and colluded with the Police to single out pick on Mr Slattery ?Was it Curran or was it someone with a vested interest? Maybe someone feeling uncomfortable about the backlash and exposing of the flawed Wheelie Bin initiative.Has Curran been used?  Were the Police manipulated?Anyone with any sense of Civic Honour and fairness should be demanding a full investigation and explanation.There are parallels with the same issues now in Ealing. The fortnightly collections are turning once smart Ealing , into a selection of smelly and dirty streets. So is it other Councillors? Officers? The members of the over secretive West London Waste Authority?Labour in Denial needs to wake up and put it's house in order.And the other Parties ought to do likewise rather than close ranks underlining the depths local politics have sunk to.Mr Slattery should stand for election as a local independent. He would win hands down.

Raymond Havelock ● 3311d