"Disinformation", defined as "false information spread deliberately to deceive."It isn't "disinformation" to state that there's been change in planning policies and guidance - you yourself acknowledge that fact.It isn't "disinformation" to state that you can't just simplify the number of units you might accommodate on a site based on the site area. Again based on your previous post you acknowledge that too.I never said you couldn't replace with towers with housing of the same number, just like on your favourite crime thread I never said that "all areas experience similar crime levels".Hence it is best incorrect, and at worse a complete lie to suggest that I am spreading "disinformation".You also state how others on here have "conflicts" with me, I've not aware of any such conflicts with anyone, I'm aware of debates and contrasting views with other posters, but that's the whole point of these forums. And although I don't post for those reasons your claims become a mockery when I point out that many local residents, local Councillors and Resident/Community Groups over the years have contacted me off-forum for informal planning advice, or formally instructed me to undertake planning work on their behalf, and many posters who contact me off-forum say how they appreciate my posts and often say how they rarely use the forums now because of the many idiots who post (just to be clear your name has never been mentioned).I know nothing about you, I know nothing about what other posters think of you and just because someone disagreed with you or made an off the cuff comment I wouldn't jump to any conclusion about you.Based on your posts (because they are the only things I have to go on) I think you take umbrage with being challenged, or when you perceive you are being challenged. Which in turn makes debate and discussion impossible. And there is nothing more condescending and patronising than lines like "I still respect your right to spread disinformation", "there is a definite problem on these boards with your behaviour", "thanks for all the background and emotion", or "it can get confusing if you are not in possession of all the facts".But you are right in that I do wish my posts did some have effect, I wish you'd actually go back, read the precise wording of every post, and then be gracious enough to admit that I haven't spread any disinformation and apologise for saying everything. Just to show the same humility and respect I suggested when I decided to stop contributing on the crime thread. I am actually embarrassed to be conversing with you about this, because generally speaking I think it's pathetic when people have petty squabbles on these forums, as it deters other people from contributing to debates. But in my eyes you crossed the line earlier, and again now by falsely accusing me of spreading "disinformation".But no matter if or how you respond, I will not reply any further, because as I say I am embarrassed at what this thread has turned into.
Adam Beamish ● 2974d