Forum Topic

The Mayor used his fathers Bus Driving  background somewhat substantially both in his campaign for nomination and for the actual Mayoral election.I do accept that saying Anti Bus is a bit harsh. But he has turned out to be rather unenthusiastic about surface transport.Both Ken Livingstone and Boris were both very much for reviving and improving the bus network but under the present Mayor it has gone into neutral.Ken lost his campaign by Killing off the Routemaster without a decent replacement.  The 'Borisbus' was originally hatched by Ken's team.He went for the Bendy Bus.  Big mistake.See Boris's Bus by Capital Transport Publishing. It's a very good read.As for the Labour stance of "Boris's vanity bus"  This Vanity bus is the only London Bus designed for London and built in the UK. It was on course to revive the entire UK bus manufacturing industry. Most of it's R&D was underwritten by London and has created and saved a heck of a lot of manufacturing jobs in the UK albeit mainly in Northern Ireland.The much claimed hideous costs of the bus are because all the development and prototype costs were included. But the design is to last  a minimum 17 years ( against 7 to 12 for all other types) and the volume of production brings the unit cost down.When first unveiled it was a huge improvement on hybrid technology and is designed to be future proofed and upgradeable. It was a huge improvement in design and quality - But not in my view as good as the original. But better than it's modern counterparts. Some of which are really costly to operate.So just as they begin to show their durability, ( all electric versions were in the build ) the Mayor cancels them. Just pure politics of spite because they have got a nickname of a politician of the wrong party.So what happens next? The Chinese lift the entire design and technology ( they do not honour or recognise patent and copyright laws ) improve on it from state funding and then sell their product to...TfL as the Mayors preferred product.So more jobs in UK lost and more imports.  In the meantime, europe soaks up the rest of the orders.But he and his office are largely unenthusiastic about buses, have not listened to the major problems that cycling highways have caused to bus journey times and frequencies and are embarking on rationalisation of services. PVRs are being reduced on many routes and capacity reduced .Apart from the marketing which is simply a revival of a shame run by LRT in the early 1990s. Nothing much is happening.  Some tweaking of services for Cross rail, but a lot of reductions in Night Bus services because of the Night Tube ( which is only on certain days but this seems to have gone unnoticed ) Unless you use night buses.No local contracts specified Hybrid or Electric, and whilst Stratford has now been moved into zone 3 along with even more enhancements, Brentford and Boston Manor,  remain in  Zone 4.  That's because their Mayor and council lobbies hard and gets it.Drivers and operating staff are still way underpaid and the issues between operating companies still exist.  He has no desire to engage and deal with the very deep crisis within the bus and road surface remit of TfL. Now Leon Daniels, the capable man in charge is calling it a day, one of several who have found the indifference to much to bear.Try reading the trade press. Sadly it is barely reported in the main papers.

Raymond Havelock ● 3057d

Apart from it being a chargeable car park, and charges are as far as I know are still unspecified, the two stores will be open till 11pm and Lidl are planning 24 hr stores.Anyone who uses the current Lidl stores locally, will know that are busy right up till they close, so the capacity will be minimal and as it will be a much smaller car park will also be at capacity between 7 and 9pm which will be too late for theatre and film patrons.So where will all these extra patrons park? The demographics are so different that the other public transport options simply don't bring in the same volume of users. Why will that suddenly change?A question that remains unanswered. People already use Public transport but it's the 65 which serves the core of regulars and Kew stn.  ( Brentford is in Zone 4 and Kew isn Zone 3 )  The difference in fare is quite considerable. Only 1 route serving the new site is 24 hour and that is likely to be cut, reduced or curtailed with the Night Tube and Crossrail changes to night bus services, some of which are already being implemented. Brentford so far is losing out to the Crossrail ripple when compared to North of the A40, Ruislip , Harrow and Heathrow.The current Mayor of London is very anti Bus and his offices indifference to bus services is resulting in many resignations and consternation within TfL. We are likely to see far more rationalisation of Bus services across all of London is the next 24 - 36 months.This will impact on venues of all sorts locally.

Raymond Havelock ● 3060d

Well they've been there before. And more than once.What happens when the £6m runs out?What happens if it fails to attract a sustainable patronage?They do not seem to have memories.When it was a mainstream oriented Art Centre it thrived. Ironically, with the exception of the Cinema which suffered from poor projection and sound equipment but is now rather good.It had late licence events and the noise affected no-one apart from maybe the Herons of the Ait.Will the hundreds of residents right on top of the new centre be happy about late gigs? The coming and going? The smells and the noise?  I doubt it.Waterman committed Hari-Kiri to meet politically correct ideals for a audience and patronage that was not there in sustainable numbers and the place has never quite recovered.  It's not the best of buildings but it is the best of locations and as many locals all say " If it can't succeed there, it won't succeed anywhere"The problem with so many in arts is that they rely on funding and grants and it's never enough. There is always a cynical aversion to doing mass market stuff. Yet the things Waterman's do that do have wide appeal get well supported, but you get the feeling that they have to rather than want to with so many mainstream aspects. Something that my wife regularly bashes my ears about.In any case, with the impending huge increase in population in the Eastern End of Brentford, the present location of this riverside ribbon town is actually more central than this myth of a Town Centre.I for one certainly think it should stay where it is or be incorporated into whatever gets built there which currently looks like a disgraceful robbery of a site gifted to Brentford.

Raymond Havelock ● 3062d