Forum Topic

My eye was caught by a snippet in this week's edition of Private Eye Rotten Boroughs, talking about Southwark council (Labour) and their crafty attempts to push through a contentious planning application just before Christmas. The application - the demolition of the Elephant & Castle shopping centre. As 'Eye' puts it " The Labour council, known for its disregard for residents it has decanted from council estates for the benefit of developers such as Lendlease, is now showing similar contempt for the Elephant traders, especially as the application fails to comply with the London Plan. This proposal is for 979 rental homes, a massive 33 of which will be at 'social rent equivalent' (ie council rents). A further 213 will  be at 'intermediate' rent (for households earning £50,000 - £90,000) and the rest at 'open market' - where the sky is the limit."Does J. Corbyn know what Labour majority councils are doing, does he care, what do the Labour party stand for anymore? See Hounslow's plans for homes on the old Acton Lodge site in Brentford and the Morrison's site etc. It's no good everyone bleating on about the housing crisis while they persist in building homes mainly for sale or laughingly referred to as 'affordable'rents which is 80% of market value - a whole lot of dosh in Londond. Where is the massive public building programme that is needed if this problem is to be tackled? What are Labour councils thinking of, or do they even think at all given their readiness to roll over constantly for these developers?

Vanessa Smith ● 2793d

Vanessa is a former member of the Labour Party and Phil very kindly joined a couple of years ago to vote in the Labour leadership election but neither appear to have attended, watched or noticed the 2015 Labour Party Conference where the local government selection rules were amended.  The most obvious impact of the changes was to make selection more like a reselection process hence the introduction of a vote at the shortlisting meeting for or against any sitting councillors to determine how many vacancies are to be filled.  This is commonly referred to as a 'trigger ballot' and is just like the process we have for selecting candidates for parliament.While many of us still prefer the simpler, traditional open selection process that Vanessa and Phil describe as the 'accepted' method, that is no longer what the 2017 Labour Party rules mandate - so in every ward selection in Hounslow and every ward selection in the rest of the country this year, like last year, this new fangled method is being implemented.There is no trickery or skullduggery involved, it's not an option, it is mandatory - and every Labour selection is being run that way now.  It may look like a short cut for sitting councillors but as many have found it can also be sudden death.  They don't get the right to attend, to speak or to vote in these meetings and if they lose that ballot except in one case so far that is the end....As for timing of selection meetings - we have had 34 meetings to arrange before Christmas, so some nights have or will have one, some two, several three (like on Wednesday) and some four meetings.  These are all arranged subject to the availability of a venue and independent scrutineers and all are done in consultation with the local elected branch officers.I hope the above helps put some of these rumours to rest.Best regardsTheo

Theo Dennison ● 2811d