Forum Topic

It is long overdue for some form of non aligned independents to stand in this Borough.Hounslow has endured at least 30 years now of tit for tat party politics and it clearly does not work well.Good councillors of all parties have come and gone and yet a stream of hard core bullying, corrupt or inept , incompetent and plain egotists seem to rule the roost.Bad decisions, careless decisions and warped policies have not done much good and developers in particular have seen the chinks in the armour and seized upon it and have too much of an in with both elected and non elected officials.It would take a sizeable amount of independents to make a change or at least keep things in check.Personally I think far more radical reform is needed. This huge unwieldy Borough needs to be split into two at least in the way certain committees operate. Chairs must not vote. and party politics ought to be completely localised and not simply echo national politics.But it needs to be a strongly pragmatic stance and not on the trendy issues made near hysterical by social media and fake distorted news and statistics ( one of the only things Trump is actually correct about)But local politics can be nasty, really nasty and it would take a lot of really strong minded and able people as independents to remain steadfast if elected.It might be too late for this election, but local groups need to form, consolidate, and get a message across.  Plenty of people are unhappy, right across the Political gamut. Most don't vote.And that's why we get what we deserve.

Raymond Havelock ● 2751d

It's heartening to see that people around the borough are beginning to take a stand, but I hope those concerned will forgive me if I sound a constructive note of caution - not to put a dampener on their aspirations, but to try to encourage them to redouble their efforts.The fact is that under certain circumstances local Labour actually welcomes the intervention of independents and/or minority party candidates.  The reason for this is that Labour has a pretty efficient local machine which will have identified "its" voters by early on in the campaign and will have the resources to bring these out on polling day.  With 1000-1500 reasonably reliable votes under its belt in any given ward, the more widely spread the non-Labour voters are the easy it will be for Labour to win under our first-past-the-post system.This was why they pulled the stunt with the bogus "UKIP" candidates whom they put up in Isleworth in 2014, although in the event that at best made no difference to the outcome and at worst actually counted against them.However, there are two exceptions to this rule.  The first is if they fear that the independent or minority party candidate is so popular that there is a serious chance of him or her actually winning.  The second is if the candidate in question has established "Labour" credentials, which could result in them taking votes from Labour in greater number than from the opposition.  This was what happened when the former Labour council leader and mayor John Connelly fought as an independent, and won, in Hounslow Heath in 2006.Where these exceptions are concerned, Linda Green would of course tick both boxes.

Phil Andrews ● 2752d