Forum Topic

Im sorry that I've been engaged elsewhere and not followed this thread.In GLA correspondence it advises LBH refused permission on or about the 1/2/18.The following is an abstract from a related 22 page letter/report.2 The Mayor subsequently advised Hounslow Council that the application was generally acceptable in strategic planning terms but did not comply with the London Plan for the reasons set out in paragraph 57 of the stage 1 report; but the resolution of those issues could lead to the application becoming compliant with the London Plan.3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. On 6 April 2017, Hounslow Council decided that it was minded to grant planning permission, subject to conditions and agreement of a section 106 agreement before 30 June 2017 (or any extended period agreed in writing). Having issued a draft section 106 agreement to the applicant on 22 August 2017 and receiving no satisfactory response, Hounslow Council officers are now minded to refuse planning permission under delegated powers and on 1 February 2018 advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008, the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, or issue a direction to the Council under Article 7 that he is to act as the Local Planning Authority for the purposes of determining the application. The Mayor has until 14 February 2018 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction.     John   0

John Todd ● 2910d

Just to be clear Nick, the 75% retail space ratio isn't applicable to the whole town centre, just to this specific site.The site has a mixed use allocation based on a floorspace ration of 75:25 retail to residential use, and that allocation was first introduced by the Brentford Area Action Plan back in 2008, and followed through to the September 2015 Local Plan.Both documents were subject to independent examination (as they have to be) from an Inspector prior to formal adoption.I think the problem, for what of a better word, is that people see that ratio and take it as gospel/set in stone, whereas firstly it is merely a broad brief for the site, and secondly the brief does goes on to state that the supermarket plays an important role with regards to the provision of a large floor plate for retail floorspace, but also a diversification of uses could also contribute to the regeneration of the town centre.I've said many times on here previous that any notion of a scheme providing 75% retail floorspace is complete pie in the sky.  This is a town centre site, there's absolutely no need or justification for a two-storey supermarket or separate retail uses on the upper floors, although it would be good to see Brentford offer more community facilities.There is however strong national and local planning policy support and associated guidance for high density residential within previously developed town centre sites.I do agree that the site brief as originally set out in the BAAP, and subsequently followed through to the Local Plan, shouldn't have set stated such an unrealistic ration, although I look more at the failure of the independent Inspector who reviewed the Local Plan to amend the ratio, because whilst those of work who work in the business know it isn't gospel, it does set an unrealistic expectation to the average person in the street.

Adam Beamish ● 2911d