Forum Topic

We have a massive democratic deficit in this borough Mark. I seldom meet anybody who has a good word to say about the Labour Party in Hounslow - seriously, hardly anyone - and yet they win time and time again and win well.  This is because they are organised, determined and adopt a painstakingly methodical approach, first identifying their voters (most of whom vote Labour by ritual) and then deploying their huge political machine to getting them out on the day.  They are also seasoned machinators, investing much time and effort into divising devious little schemes through which to divide their opposition - plus, of course, they have the dubious benefit of not being restrained by scruple.Winning council elections is about organisation and perseverance - one takes time and the other takes character.  You should regard the new independent initiative as a work in progress.  It is not enough just to field a slate of candidates and hope everyone goes out and votes for them.  An independent campaign needs, in my view, to work three times as hard as that of the political parties just to keep up with them.  Without a series of leaflets and a full canvass, at the very least, it is pretty much impossible.Also, whatever you do, don't expect any help from the Tories - even when it may appear that their political interest would be best served by accommodating you.  Whatever impression they like to give to the contrary their target is always simply to hold on to Chiswick.  The only time they become animated about what happens elsewhere is when there is an independent challenge, and then their overriding concern is that it should not succeed.  Although they are more adept at disguising the fact they are instinctively every bit as primeval and tribal as local Labour, and they are always much happier playing second fiddle to Labour in a two-party council than they are sharing the field with community-based activists and small parties.I'm not saying independents can't win seats this time around, just don't be too despondent if they don't - community politics can be a long game.  Local Labour had a scare twelve years ago - it didn't take them long to forget the lessons of that defeat, and so their arrogance is your opportunity.

Phil Andrews ● 2725d

Sorry - I don't live in Brentford but the other end of the borough in Hanworth. I spotted this forum entry in a link in our Feltham group page. We have just had the Labour manifesto for the council elections delivered through the front door and it states that they pledge to overhaul doorstep waste collection and recycling (and sort out all the potholes - a different story altogether) but surely this is something that the current Labour council have failed to do so why think a new Labour council will fix both issues?They don't actually mention that its the current Labour council that have caused the issues with waste and recycling and potholes - its as if the current (old) Labour regime don't / didn't exist - so voters will vote for the new Labour regime because they mention they will fix these issues.I've not seen any other party manifestos but if they don't mention the issues with potholes / waste and recycling then I'm guessing Labour will get back in because they are promising to fix the issues that they created.I am just wondering if the Labour manifesto can be considered lawfully correct?Could it be that the current 'old' labour has obviously mismanaged waste and recycling that it must be very apparant to Cllr Curran & Mann, that their handling of this may be there undoing or 'new' labour wants to clear desks of 'old' labour, maybe with some momentum ?.Oh and their manifesto back in 2014 said - Overhaul bin collection; to boost recycling and get streets cleaner!

Mark Parsons ● 2726d

It doesn't all have to be sorted in the same way - there may be different contracts (or the Space Waye website may not have been updated to take into account a change in the reduction in recyclability of film type plastic). Collections from flats can be different from houses etc. Some plastics are more recyclable than others and some countries manage to recycle more. The charge for carrier bags was for a reason - they are after all a fairly new invention and we lived happily without them for years.  We've known that China would stop accepting all the West's plastics and mixed paper for quite a while - they did warn us.  Unfortunately we are rather slow in this country - Wales and Scotland are faster in putting alternative plans in place eg Scotland are going for a Deposit Return System for plastic bottles as so many are not recycled despite a market for them.  In England I understand that there is lobbying against the idea by big business.  Meanwhile our streets and countryside are littered with them.There are campaigns asking the supermarkets to use less plastic - in Germany you can leave packaging at the supermarket so you don't have to take it home to deal with or for your Council to deal with.  Perhaps their Producer Pays system works better than ours.  Alternatively you can choose to buy less packaging by buying loose fruit and vegetables from a market stall or shop that uses less.  Why does a bulb of garlic in a net in Morrisons cost more than one without?  Or an aubergine in the Coop come in  plastic bag and one in Sainsbury's with just a sticker?  I wouldn't buy soft fruit scooped into a paper bag from the market as in the past but would be prepared to take my own punnet or pay extra if I didn't.Why not see if you can get a further meeting with the LBH team but from reading about a meeting on this website where residents only got a few minutes to ask questions it may not be that easy.For the unbelievers:https://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/ecover-launches-100-recycled-pet-plastic-bottles/That is what we should be aiming for.  Looking at at the bottom of a punnet for grapes I can see that it is R-PET and that means that it is made from recycled (or a percentage thereof) polyethylene terephthalate.  We need to see our waste as a resource.  Aluminium can be reused again and again and is a lot cheaper when so much energy is saved in its production. We can expect more producer responsibility requirements as recently there has been an increase in plastic packaging and there are plenty of campaigns against so much packaging.  It can be difficult to find loose apples in supermarkets now they all seem to be suddenly appearing in cardboard trays with unrecyclable plastic film wrapping - and no longer in the "recyclable at a larger supermarket with the carrier bags" plastic bags.

Philippa Bond ● 2729d

After being involved in two employment support allowance (ESA)  assessments, which both separate disabled candidates were turn down for ESA. Both these cases were  taken to the appeal court and the judge in both cases overturned the original DWP assessor decision  So there is no way I would vote for a proposed Conservative candidate who works or did work as a Work and Pensions disability benefits assessor.This information was included in the very early stages of the local Conservative  party when they first introduced there prospective candidates, the DWP assessor information is now missing from the candidates information. Mind you the candidate may not work in that job any-more.I doubt that many disabled residents would not vote for such a person after being assessed by one, and ended up in the appeal court.  Of the 170,000 appeals for personal independence payments (PIP) claims that have been taken to the Tribunal in the past five years, since 2013, claimants won in 63 per cent of cases. In the same period, there have been 53,000 employment support allowance (ESA) appeals, of which claimants won in 60 per cent of cases.Both Atos and Capita – the companies contracted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)' to carry out the bulk of the assessments – saw a rise in the proportion of reports graded “unacceptable” last year. Information copied from this pagehttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/benefits-uk-disability-assessment-company-report-finds-government-cuts-a8208271.html

Bernard Allen ● 2731d

Whatever people may think of him the fact he has been a Councillor for years now suggests that his constituents are happy with him.I've never made any secret of the fact that Cllr. Mann and I certainly didn't see eye to eye when I first started working at LBH back in late 2001.  In part that was because I was young, naive and idealistic then, I'd come from enforcement teams at previous authorities where Members effectively rubber stamped my recommendations, there was never any suggestion of the authority not enforcing.So to find recommendations of myself and my team to enforce being overturned was a complete shock to me.  But I think it was the making of me, it made me realise that I had to leave no stone unturned and able to see matters from all perspectives.By the time I came to leave LBH 5 years later it was abit of a joke between myself and Cllr. Mann what a bad start we got off, because as time went on our relationship improved massively as we both understood where the other was coming from and I'm quite openly admit I liked the guy.And this was at a time when Heston & Cranford Area Committee was in all kinds of trouble about planning issues, particularly enforcement matters, yet I know from the time I spent there and the dialogue I had with H&C members both at committee and away from committee that he would never try to sway me or influence me from doing my job, something I certainly couldn't say about every member of that committee.The lesson I learnt from that was not to underestimate the importance of the constituents behind the Members, which I still think many people do, it's easy to say "oh how can anyone vote for that person, I'd never do so", but you're just one person with your own perspectives on matters.If the Church Street issue was such a vote winner, for example, you'd assume all the Members who voted for it won't retain their seats, but I bet it won't work out that way.

Adam Beamish ● 2734d