Sorry Guy,I beg to differ, and I know you do cycle so should be familiar with the whole district on a bike.The works are so far, neat and tidy,But it's not a great design. Its made the road dangerous. I Don't know about full on accidents, but I've been on two buses in 10 days, one of which nearly hurled me into the top deck window when it had to emergency stop when a truck lost it at the chicane of a road island. Another had a puncture when it had to mount the pavement to avoid another HGV. Boston Manor road is the only road suitable for HGVs as heavy industry still operates in the Trumpers way industrial estates in Hanwell and on estates on Windmill Lane, Southall which is only accessible from the South via BMRThe new kerbs are razor sharp and unless the top surface is going to be raised , hits pedals of bikes, Why they are not slanted like in Europe is quite beyond me.If you come off you will really get hurt.And cyclists including myself, simply won't use it heading south. It's too convoluted and time consuming. Few will bother. It's the same on several of these TfL routes and still they do not listen and adapt.And as I will continue to press. The best way to cycle safely and easily allowing the most people to participate in cycling, is to sort out all the quiet back streets rendered unridable by potholes, ruts and unclear road markings.Sorting that would be far more sensible and a far better use of our money.The consultation did not go wide enough as this affects a far wider range of people than just the residents of BMR. It affects all those who use BMR.Sadly the petition might well be politically led and I think it is way,way too late. But who knew it was going to be so complex, elaborate and dangerous?But it is a wake up call for the CS9, parts of which verge on total insanity.If we cannot make a long established cycle route work and get it right then forcing routes into already over congested roads which are largely commercial traffic which is why we all make a living here then it is a gamble with money that is not in abundance.
Raymond Havelock ● 2670d