Forum Topic

The Workplace Parking Levy (WPL)is certainly a tax on the use of road vehicles. As with Vehicle Excise Duty, Company Car Tax and, arguably, fuel duty it is a tax to imvest in public transport to compensate for the costs of road maintenance, congestion, pollution, and deaths and injuries caused by vehicle use.WPL has legislative backing in the Road Traffic Act 2000 and subseqent amendements to that Act.I believe that Hounslow have just completed a consultation on the introduction of WPL to the north and south of part of the Great West Road from Syon Lane to Windmill Road. This includes major employment sites including Tesco Osterley, Sky and GSK. There are several proposed exemptions from WPL including smaller businesses and parking for the disabled.I understand that the results of the consultation will be analysed and reported before any firm decisions are made.The cost of the WPL per parking space could be calculated on the basis of the cost of a return bus ticket (about £3 per day). The entire proceeds from the levy will be applied to making public transport improvements. In Hounslow's case these improvements could include:     1]A new train service between the existing train stations at Syon Lane and Brentford up to Old Oak Common (connecting to HS2) and onto Cricklewood2]A new passenger train service connecting the Great Western Mainline and Crossrail linking Southall with Brentford through provision of a new station adjacent to West Cross Industrial Park.  3]Improved bus services to and along the Great West Road, including a potential express service between Osterley and Gunnersbury stations.4]Improved walking and cycling access along the Great West Road corridor  Nottingham has already introduced a WPL and other cities including Cambridge, Oxford, Edinburgh and Glasgow are developing similar schemes.About a year ago a WPL scheme for Greater Manchester was rejected by councillors.In my mind there's not a lot to dislike about WPL schemes but in the shorter term I would be concerned about increased pressures on the creaking public transport system in our part of London.

Jim Storrar ● 2565d

these types of cross country comparisons simply don't work.  You're a nice chap Guy, but please don't fall into that old Labour policy of cherry picking things to shift the blame or to give a false impression. As you point out, Luxembourg is a richer country than the UK, so of course there's more tax paid by the average individual, because he or she earns more.  As another example, look at their property purchase tax and you'll see it's 7%, which is a lot lower than the 12% that a large portion of London property buyers have to pay, and the price they pay to buy each square meter of property looks like it's a third of that in London.  As a third example if Gordon Brown hadn't sold all our gold off when gold was at historically low prices, then perhaps we'd have enough reserves to pay for something like free hoppa tickets. Forth example; perhaps the cost of the Nuclear free zone policy that the local council had for Houslow back in the 80's.  Fifth example, the cash reserves the supposedly broke council is hording (about an entire years council tax for each of us council tax payers). Sixth example.... and so on.As to making people pay to park at their offices, then on one hand I'm in favour as it reduces the illegal level of pollution we all breathe in Brentford (which the council appear to be very good at doing nothing about) and on the other hand I'm not in favour of it because it's a touch draconian and in the style of local government that you might expect from 1970's East Germany.

Lorne Gifford ● 2565d