Forum Topic

CIC forces closure of Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

Gunnersbury Park Bowling Club was formed in 1931. When the Community (now, there's a misnomer!) Interest Company took over the running of the Park, bowls club members were assured that CIC valued bowling, wished to see it continue and wanted to discuss ways of increasing use of the green by the general public. What were those assurances worth? Or Hounslow's Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, with its laudable aims of promoting both, but, in reality, nothing but hot air? Now the sports hall is running massively late and needs more money (were late-finishing penalties not included in the building contract?) and CIC are kicking out the bowls club to replace it with a secret sporting activity to produce revenue. CIC refuse to reveal what the secret activity is or to explain why there is such a need for secrecy. The bowls club did not cost the councils a penny; members looked after everything, including the upkeep of the green. Yet we are the sacrificial lamb, in another example of CIC shortsighted short-termism. We have been told that our site is just right for the new secret activity, but is it really believable that, had there been any goodwill or readiness to look for an alternative, there is nowhere else in the Park that could accommodate it? When/if this venture fails to generate the required revenue and packs up and leaves, the bowling green cannot be restored. Bowling was the one activity in the Park for the older members of the community; the bowling club was where for years we stayed active, socialised with friends and held competitions with other local clubs. All that has been disregarded and summarily thrown away by the autocratic CIC - judge and jury, unaccountable to the community whose interests it's meant to safeguard, not subject to oversight and strangers to transparency.

bela cunha ● 2258d12 Comments

I was just about to attempt to answer the 'consultation' on the 'Parks Events Strategy' and nearly tearing my hair out, when this popped up. How absolutely appalling. Looking at some of the 'strategy' it seemed to me that Hounslow may well not have the capacity to deliver much of it, and I nearly choked when I read that they considered the Junction 2 event in Boston Manor 'a success', they cannot be serious. The ground was left - and remains months and months later, looking like a re-enactment of The Battle of the Somme, so great was the damage caused. Then there is the total lack of notice taken at Dukes Meadows over the objections to the proposed extra parking and turning area for coaches that will mainly benefit private facilities/schools, in spite of the petition against the proposals and the fact they had to resort to an FOI to find out what was going on in meetings.There was also the normal piffle about 'diversity' and the need to prove that events were inclusive of this, that and the other group - apparently this matters not in Gunnersbury where this discrimination against mainly older people is being proposed. I could go on and on - suffice to say life is too short to waste time even bothering to respond to this 'consultation' when we all know full well it is just going through the motions, and it is not meaningful at all. It's all about the money and what they can do next to generate even more never mind depriving the public of their own open spaces. So what if Ealing generate more money from their parks since when did this become a competition? As for this CIC - as the OP observed, a misnomer if ever there was one.

Vanessa Smith ● 2257d