Forum Topic

Land Referencing - Heathrow expansion

We have just received our second letter re this.  We completed the first request so cannot understand why they need to contact us again.  Does anyone have any idea why or what this might lead to?  Many thanks.

Pat Kingham ● 2023d4 Comments

"Heathrow have a duty to try to establish the details of the people affected by their plans and need to show that they have made efforts."But they are writing to people who they 'believe' are affected so isn't it important that people respond in the affirmative or it could be argued that fewer people are really affected or really care about the effect.  Surely Heathrow would welcome the fact that many have torn up the papers?

Steve Taylor ● 2020d

I quite liked the "advice" that the Planning Inspectorate gave to John Hunt when he enquired about land referencing.https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/london/expansion-of-heathrow-airport-third-runway/?ipcsection=advice&ipcadvice=fad63b8f25Heathrow have a duty to try to establish the details of the people affected by their plans and need to show that they have made efforts. I guess the latest campaign is trying to get more people to reply but I think it is sloppy to badger people who have actually provided info.As the advice says "questionnaire recipients are not mandated to volunteer information about their interest(s) in land to a DCO applicant, if they do not wish to do so."

Tim Henderson ● 2023d

Tore mine up as the first.

Christopher Hugh Dakers ● 2023d

I have just binned mine )again).
I have no intention of providing any data which "may be processed outside of the UK" and which will "be retained for 10 years".

N V Brooks ● 2023d