I've 'attended' 2 virtual planning committees in other parts of the country in the last month and every Councillor has been present, including a very large total of 19 voting Members at one committee.Regarding democracy, turning the thread slightly on its head, I had a controversial application (over 300 objections) which was deferred in October 2019 at Members request for clarification on certain issues, and was then due to be reported back to Committee on 19th March, just prior to the introduction of the lockdown.The authority took the decision to cancel that March committee (even though at that time we weren't in lockdown), and the application was then reported to the first 'virtual' planning committee, which didn't take place until early June.People still complained before that meeting (although of course they didn't complain afterwards when Members refused it !) that it was 'undemocratic' that a controversial application was decided by a virtual planning committee, but the actual process was no different to any other planning committee I've attended. It was still a public meeting so anyone could watch the report, the speakers still got to address the Members and ask questions, the Members still debated the issues at length and so forth.Who knows how long both my client and the public would have had to wait for a decision to be made had the authority not referred the application to the virtual meeting.
Adam Beamish ● 1877d