Forum Topic

Brentford TV4hEIGHT LABOUR COUNCILLORS BREAK RANK AND ATTACK COUNCIL'S NEW TRAFFIC SCHEMES, LARGELY AGREEING WITH TORY OPPOSITION.  They are forcing the controversial strategy – driven forward by the Labour Cabinet – to be "called in" for consideration by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee. They accuse Cllr Hanif Khan, Transport, leader Steve Curran and others of:1. Inadequate consultation with stakeholders prior to the decisionWard councillors have not been engaged or consulted, particularly on phase 3 (the next stage), which Cabinet has approved, in principle, with this decision.Decisions about Streetspace appear to be made by Cabinet Members and Chief Officers without reference to ward councillors who are the democratically elected representatives of local residents.Other stakeholders, including local businesses and transport providers, also do not seem to have been adequately consulted.2. Inadequate evidence on which to base a decisionThe programme contains schemes based on suggestions gathered from the public from April to June 2020, combined with the aspirations of Cabinet Members and Chief Officers. There is no evidence of traffic modelling or other objective evidence to assess the impact, or feasibility of individual schemes.3. A potential human rights or equalities challengeThe public sector equality duty (PSED) applies when making any changes to road networksIn this instance, many individual schemes are likely to disadvantage residents who cannot easily walk or cycle, particularly older residents, disabled residents and residents with young childrenAlthough para 11.0 says an “initial assessment of potential equalities impacts has been developed”, it has not been published, and the report does not say whether, or not, unmitigated disadvantage to protected groups has been identified.The call-in is now listed for the next meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, for Monday 30 November, starting at 6pm. It can be watched online. There is also a request for a call-in from Cllr John Todd, Conservative. The agenda says: "Initial Response to Call-in – Lead Members Cllrs Hanif Khan, Katherine Dunne and Guy Lambert."This will be followed by "Members Questions, then Members Discussion and Decision".The rebel councillors are led by Cllr Richard Eason, Isleworth, and are Cllrs Gurmail Lal, Afzaal Kiani, Puneet Grewal, Amrit Mann, Javed Akhunzada, Surinder Purewal and Mohammed Umair. It is unusual for councillors to call in an issue involving their own party. Normally it is resolved internally. But this move has brought the traffic controversy out into the open and exposes dissent in the Labour ranks. More than that, the Labour councillors are agreeing with the criticisms made by the Tory opposition. The fact that it could not be settled internally indicates a deep disagreement which could undermine confidence in Cllr Khan's strategy – and therefore his position – and prompt people to ask why council leader Steve Curran could not sort this out behind the scenes, as he usually would. If the plans are reversed in a significant way, and against his wishes, then Cllr Khan might have to go. The ripple effect would reach out to his schemes' most ardent supporters – Cllrs Curran, Dunne and Lambert – and the Tories would no doubt exploit it to the full. For the Labour administration, it is a fulcrum moment.Brentford Today & TV/Facebook.Image may contain: 9 people, text that says ""Inadequate consultation. May disadvantage older, disabled and those with children." LABOUR SPLIT OVER NEW TRAFFIC SCHEMES Eight Labour rebels attack Cllr Khan's decisions Richard Eason Gurmail Lal Afzaal Kiani Puneet Grewal Amrit Mann Javed Akhunzada Surinder Purewal Mohammed Umair Could Hanif Khan go? Call-in: Decision on cEX 496 Streetspace Programme Overview and Scrutiny November 2020 6:00"

Vanessa Smith ● 1724d

This is exactly what happens. One ill conceived policy leads to a ripple factor and stuffs up an entire district and takes with it peoples livelihoods, ability to attend to isolated relatives and elders and all normal life, in the naive belief that all this can be done on foot or by bike. That's fine if you have nothing better to do and have the time to poodle about on a bike or wander about leaving all the heavy stuff and chores to someone else.This is insane and already people who work on call ( and I am one of them) are becoming less and less able to respond and am losing work and income. It has taken up to an hour to get out of Ealing of late and that is with less traffic than in the last year or so.But it's the extent of road works in South Ealing and other locations that is the real problem in Swyncombe Ave. It's far enough away to suit the surveys to justify the LTNs, but those encapsulated streets were never really busy as local traffic  diluted over dozens of streets. It's now concentrated to a few. You cannot be a rat runner if you live in the district. Another spun myth.It's impossible to gauge with South Ealing stuffed up. Even I have to use Swyncombe to get to and from Brentford and my office and I rarely ever do.The road is straight, wider than Windmill road ( which ought to have had an HGV ban decades ago) has no CPZ restrictions and virtually every dwelling has a driveway for two cars and a garage.  It was built like that because it was a trunk link road and would carry more traffic right from the start.But the fact is the LTNs are like a cancer and it spreads a disease that becomes all consuming.If it ain't broke don't try to fix it. Unfortunately Authorities cannot help themselves and wreck anything they turn their attention to.Just to suit egos and half baked policies.

Raymond Havelock ● 1724d