Forum Topic

A LABOUR Party official caused outrage last night after suggesting sports fans who wave the England flag are racist. The outburst came from Terry White, of Labour’s Communications Unit, in an email to a member of the public. It followed a row last week when ex-minister Gisela Stuart claimed the rise of Englishness is a threat to democracy. German-born Ms Stuart said she is concerned people claim to be English rather than British. The man who complained, named only as Allan Murray, wrote: “Why is it that as a party you dislike the English so much? I am fed up to the back teeth with Labour’s endless dumbing down of the English. The Labour Party are trying to wipe England off the UK map.” Mr White, who is 65 and near retirement, wrote back: “England, as opposed to Britain, has an unfortunate history around the world and within the British Isles and please do not say that it is all past. “It is a fact that the right and extreme right in Britain cloak themselves in the English flag, the cross of St George and claim to be the true representatives of the English. “Wherever there is hooligan behaviour, usually linked to extreme right-wing political groups eg, at football matches here and abroad, it is the flag of St George that is displayed.” Millions of flag-wavers will be outraged by the attack on fans. After England’s rugby World Cup triumph a million supporters packed the streets of London to cheer their heroes home many draped in the St George’s flag. There were similar scenes after the England cricket team trounced the Aussies. Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell raged: “I find these comments insulting and outrageous. “People will be very angry to hear what Labour thinks of them and their country.” UKIP leader Roger Knapman said: “This is an insult to our own people. To suggest that England, but not Britain, has ‘an unfortunate history’, is sheer ignorance. If Labour is seeking to disown the Empire, then it should be told that it was the British, not English, Empire.” A Labour spokesman said: “We cannot condone these comments and they in no way represent the views of the Party. We apologise unreservedly for any offence caused.”

Paul Fisher ● 7111d

I understand the flag being flown was a St George's flag. As such, it would be ludicrous to describe the flag as racist. The question that should have been posed is whether the slogan is racist or offensive. I suspect those who made the flag intended it to be offensive, and if so they have achieved their objective.Comparisons with the French and US flags raise some interesting issues. Has anyone ever seen a French or American flag with a slogan scrawled on it? I certainly haven't. I suspect anyone writing a slogan on the stars and stripes in the US would find himself/herself in deep trouble for defacing the national flag.For my own part, it took me many years to regard the union jack as a national symbol of the UK. In my youth it was a daily reminder to Catholics in the west of Scotland of their second class status and frequently bore the interchangeable slogans "no surrender" or "F.T.P." For the uninitiated the second slogan incites an unnatural sexual act with the head of the Cathoilic church.Fortunately the majority of the population in that part of the UK has moved on from this crude sectarianism. However, the next time you take offense when black English players are subjected to racist abuse in Europe remember that a UK player, Neil Lennon of Celtic, is unable to play international football because of death threats made to his family in Northern Ireland.Sorry that this is such a long reply. However, I believe everyone should be able to attend football matches without feeling threatened. The Hearts supporter who recently was convicted of racially aggravated assault for describing Craig Bellamy as a Welsh b****** probably has some cause to feel hard done by in the Scottish courts. However, within my own hearing at matches in Glasgow this has produced a significant reduction verbal abuse. So perhaps some good was done.

John Connelly ● 7117d