Forum Topic

If the police were armed the way policing in the uk would dramatically change every incident the police attended from a neighbor dispute to an armed incident. Police in this country at present have the ability to deal with incidents with a little more freedom because the security of the firearm is not an issue.in the uk the police do not have enough respect from the general public unlike those in the US or in Europe, mainly down to the stupid laws, joke of a justice system, (100 hrs community service for committing a burglary or 7 days imprisonment for not paying council tax!!!!!!) and everyone hell bent on making life more difficult because by complaining what the police/government do in order to protect us may breach their human rights. Yet America and elsewhere in Europe have police forces that are respected The Police should train every single recruit at training school in the use, tactics and laws of the use of fire arms this would mean that every officer is trained yet not necessarily carrying a firearm all the time with regular training to keep them up to date with training and law.  By doing this would enable each London borough decided whether their officers carry them or not based on the current risk assessment.The other option is to issue every officer with Tazer the stun gun a less lethal option but apparently effective, giving the officers a little extra protection on the street for both themselves and the public.Unfortunately the police WILL NOT be armed all the time the government are in power, we have governments that are more interested in scoring political points against one another than the safety of the public and voting together on issues.The police do a good job considering all the paperwork and stresses they are under, they spend hours after arresting someone doing all the paperwork, just for that person to be told you’re a naughty boy have a fine which often doesn’t match cost of the officers overtime or the hard work so can you blame them when they say “why do I bother” 

Dave Vokes ● 7121d

From the BBC News                                                            Debate over whether to arm police The murder of a policewoman by a gang of robbers in Bradford has reignited debate over whether all police should carry guns and wear body armour. Home Office minister Hazel Blears has rejected calls for officers to be routinely armed. That could endanger the police's relationship with the public, she said. But film director Michael Winner, founder of the Police Memorial Trust, said if officers were armed they would have "a better chance of retaliation". Ms Blears said what happened in Bradford highlighted "the fact that police officers right across the country put their lives on the line in many cases in order to protect the rest of us". How much longer can this go on? Would criminals not think twice when faced by a police officer holding a firearm? Arm them now, give them the protection they deserve John Mizon, York In the wake of the Bradford shooting, the Police Federation has called for more armed response units. "When we did a survey three years ago of all police officers, over 80% of police officers said they did not believe that every police officer should be routinely armed," she told BBC News. "They did, however, express concern that not sufficient officers were trained to carry firearms. "I do think that the resilience of the police officers, in terms of having enough firearms officers, is extremely questionable at the moment and that will need to be properly debated." 'Informed debate' Pc Norman Brennan, director of Protect the Protectors, welcomed an "informed debate" and a ballot of all officers on "the full time arming of the British police service". The adage that if you arm the police more criminals will carry guns is nonsense Pc Norman Brennan Protect the Protectors  "The adage that if you arm the police more criminals will carry guns is nonsense. "The police service are being outgunned on the streets of Britain day and night." He said that if the routine carrying of firearms meant officers retained the confidence of the public "then so be it". Mr Winner is among the most vocal advocates of guns for all officers. "The criminals are armed with guns and knives, with weapons that kill the police and I think they should have a better chance of retaliation," he said. However, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair has said 90% of the Met is unarmed and he "wants to keep it that way". 'Stiffer punishments' Chris Fox, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, said: "We mustn't make massive decisions until we know exactly what happened. "Was the equipment at fault, what could have been done to prevent this? "Then we need to review the equipment we have available, look at the way we deploy to calls, so that any officer who's being sent to a job knows that they've got the best support possible." Mr Fox called on the courts to issue stiffer punishments to offenders caught carrying weapons. "They should get the very maximum sentences - throw away the key, for me," he said. Meanwhile, the chairman of the West Yorkshire Police Federation has talked about the problems of issuing officers with protective body armour. We've got to weigh up the issue of protection and practical issues enabling officers to do their jobs Tom McGhie West Yorkshire Police Federation  Pc Sharon Beshenivsky was wearing armour providing limited protection but the bullet penetrated her chest. Tom McGhie said: "We've got to weigh up the issue of protection and practical issues enabling officers to do their jobs. "There are types of body armour which offer a much higher level of ballistic protection but the problem is they would be almost unwearable." But Pc Joe Holness, who set up a National Memorial Day to honour officers who lost their lives while on duty, told BBC News that all officers should wear bullet proof vests. "It's only right and proper that officers patrolling the streets are properly protected and to wear body armour that is both stab proof and ballistic is something that would assist in that regard," he said. A Home Office spokesman said the equipment used was decided on by chief officers of each police force. Story from BBC NEWS:http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/uk/4451640.stmPublished: 2005/11/19 22:55:42 GMT© BBC MMV

Paul Allen ● 7121d