Forum Topic

What utter tosh.BBC apologised for an unwise edit, and two senior executives have resigned. But Trump did say exactly what they reported, just not in quite the way they edited.Anybody who was watching that day were perfectly clear that Trump was encouraging the riot that lost 5 lives.All these deaths were caused exclusively by fanatical Trump supporters without any encouragement from the BBC though no doubt they reported what he said live, as did US stations and others around the world. He didn't like being beaten and having tried to fix the voting (and having failed because even Republicans refused to fix it) he tried to get the result overturned by violence, including against his own Vice President.The edit you're complaining about has NEVER been released in the USA.Trump has pardoned all the rioters who caused the deaths.He has also sued (or threatened to) the BBC which is standard in his playbook, because he will not tolerate any real news which he doesn't like. He bullies them to shut up and many US news outlets are scared off.He has sued numerous US newspapers and TV stations and his supporters are calling for journalists to be executed. Maybe you agree with that.I want the BBC to stand up to those who sell lies and do our country down. They need more of a backbone. BBC is governed by independent governors, many appointed by Conservatives, including the former Director General, a former Conservative parliamentary candidate in Hammersmith. There are a number of politically active Conservative governors and former investment bankers, hardly the nonsense put about that the BBC is left wing!

Guy Lambert ● 26d

Thanks for a bit of constructive debate.For me, I have lost any faith in Labour leadership in Hounslow. This led to me resigning from the cabinet, being suspended for suggesting council houses which had been ready for months should be allocated to (for example) the family  who were living in a sitting room with all their belongings in suitcases because their bedrooms were uninhabitable. They had been promised one of the new houses and told they would move in immediately. A month later they contacted me when nothing had happened and there was no news. Nothing was done until I went public. When I went public I was suspended. I appealed and the appeal was refused. As I had clearly said, if suspended I would resign from the Labour group at Hounslow, and would at that stage would have happily continued as an independent Labour councillor. I was expelled from the party and told I could apply for readmission by applying to the National Executive Committee, but not for 5 years.Good news - 5 families were rehoused a few days later.Many of the Labour (and some Conservatives) I still see as good or excellent councillors, and I wish them well.As to Labour nationally: I have always been loyal to the leadership and campaigned enthusiastically for last year's general election. I have always been on the left of the Labour Party but I supported the 'wide church'.I believe the current national leadership have made a lot of serious mistakes. But they are the government for the next 3-4 years and I expect they will improve.The Greens are much closer to my political beliefs and now have a leader who communicates  very effectively. I look particularly at their published values: "honesty, fairness, efficient and competent management, empathy, working for you". They precisely reflect my own values. At present they have only 4 MPs so can have little power (influence is another matter) in Parliament. Their policies and values are much better than Labour and I will be delighted to support them nationally!Back to Hounslow: The Conservatives are clearly a broken party at present. Two of them have already defected to Labour and at least 2 are standing down next year, including the widely-respected John Todd.Reform are a strongly right-wing party, run by multi-millionaires with extensive links to American billionaires and Russian oligarchs. Their approach is completely populist and very obviously untrustworthy. Their leader spends a large part of his time in the USA (where a lot of his enormous income derives from) and very rarely visits his Clacton constituency or his place of 'work' Westminster to earn the 'pin money' (for him) of £94K. Of course he is paid office expenses and I hope he doesn't get in trouble for fraud with that which he was rumoured to have been accused of when he worked (well, he didn't work much really) in Brussels. His deputy lives half the time in Dubai because his rich partner doesn't want to pay VAT on private school fees. Every prominent Reform person is an ex-Tory.I hear one or two of our traditional Corbynistas may have joined the Corbyn Party. Some of them are friends of mine but I never really believed in Corbyn. I never voted for him but supported Labour despite that when he was the democratically-elected lead of Labour. The party values are more important than the leader.As to Theo, I have written about him before. He was good to me when I was a new councillor and I get on well with him. I don't have a clue what his real politics are. Last known allegiance was to George Galloway. What he does now as far as I can see, is simply turn up where there is an audience and a chance for some clicks. He always talks loudly in formal Council meetings and recently has done so at Area Forum. If you want to know what he does beyond that I have no idea. I rarely bump into him in Brentford and I never see him on local media, and his casework numbers are very modest. Of course, he is always available when Brentford TV provides him with an audience.That is a lengthy post, because I believe in communicating with the local people which I can do better in writing. 503 (and counting) blogs demonstrate that, as does my habit of responding quickly to every request from an resident (though I know I am not perfect!). Some people don't like my blogs but the overwhelming feedback I get is positive.

Guy Lambert ● 53d