Forum Topic

Oh how desperate are you! Again quite disingenuous to state that according to Farage it was a reward for promoting “ the damage to  Britain” In any event this story of the gift being a reward is just boring non news with the  Greens and Tories desperate to make something out of it to smear Farage. The Tories are just furious that the BRITISH billionaire used to donate to them and has now donated £12 million to Reform. The Greens are just furious because they don’t have direction or any plans so they hang on desperately to the tails of all the other parties to keep their name in the news. They’re a lost cause in the wilderness of confusion and envy. The Greens can only dream of receiving donations because nobody with money believes in them or their lost causes which would  damage the UK. “The Reform leader also told The Sun he "cannot be bought by anybody" and the money from Christopher Harborne was given to him on a "completely unconditional basis".Farage said he is not concerned about the investigation. Farage has previously said he was under "no obligation" to declare the gift because he received it before he was elected as Clacton MP, it was for his "personal security" and "wasn't political in any sense at all".In total, the businessman gave £12m to Reform in 2025 and has donated to the Conservatives in the past.The separate £5m gift to Farage was made in early 2024 and Reform sources say it was made before he had decided to stand as an MP.Asked if he was worried about what people thought of the gift given the scale of it, Farage replied: "It's very unusual for someone to give up 27 years of their life to campaign for something.And this was given to me on an unconditional basis, completely unconditional basis. But frankly, it was given as a reward for campaigning for Brexit for 27 years."On whether it had an impact on his decision to return to public life, Farage replied "no" before also saying "I cannot be bought by anybody".

Paul Tucker ● 12d

If you think Hounslow is bad take a look at Ealing.It's the same but worse. Power weilding councillors and cabinet members far too arrogant or conceited to ever engage with their ward electorate unless they are affiliates or party members. Connections that are barely just permissible. Changing constitution articles during the election run up. Cosy relationships with developers and consultancies. Huge renumeration and portfolios which beggar belief for ordinary mortals to even be able to contemplate - hence the door open to over politicised advisors and appointees on salaries way above their true abilities.  Blights almost every council. Serious issues (to local people) are dismissed and never responded to.So no surprise that all 3 in one ward were ejected for Lib Dems in a ward which has always had at least one Labour member.  In the adjacent ward Labour remained but one of the councillors in that ward is responsible for implementation of schemes that were not detailed in the last manifesto and operates with a degree of divide and rule.  He has one virtue. He is about the only one who responds. But exposes his lack of depth on issues and his answers are always evasive. A true politician. and why so many simply give up voting or bothering to engage.Similarly in Hounslow. Voters taken for granted, a stampede for contract giving positions  by the same characters. And parachuted in candidates who cannot tell the difference between Brentford Dock and Brentford Lock ( a raw example from a good while ago but still pertinent )Party Machine and influence from associates must be a nightmare for diligent councillors of any political colours but the way the Labour Party operates with it's dark side always lurking and never flushed out is obviously with big majorities more prevalent and with a tiny majority might make for a better performance all round.Just how many Councillors can be seen as ward and residents first and party dictate second ? Not many and how thick skinned they may must be.

Raymond Havelock ● 13d