Forum Topic

The New Council

The recent Borough AGM brought to an end a long period of Labour Party control. The Council is now being run by a coalition of 23 Tories and 6 Independent (Isleworth) Community Group (ICG) Councillors, with support from 2 of the three Independent Alliance councillors. (Labour now has 24 Councillors and the Lib Dems 4).  The new executive which will run the council is made up of 7 Tories and 2 ICG members. The leader will be Chiswick Tory Peter Thompson; his deputy is Feltham Tory Mark Bowen. ICG man Phil Andrews has joined the Tories on the Executive, he is widely tipped to get the Housing portfolio, the alternative being suggested is Mark Bowen.  Despite votes against by the Tories, the new Lib Dem leader Andrew Dakers was elected to the West London Waste Authority with the support of the Labour members and abstentions from the ICG. The ICG blocked the appointment of our own Labour Councillor Matt Harmer to the board of Brentford Dock with a last minute nomination of one of their new Syon Councillors. Brentford Labour Councillor Ruth Cadbury will continue to be involved on various committees concerned with Heathrow and aviation issues.. The deal with the Tories to give (former Lib Dem, now Independent Alliance) Cllrs Hills and Nakamura position on the Feltham area committee will no doubt keep them locked in for a while. We are certainly in for interesting times. Will the Tories be able to control the ICG and deliver on their manifesto commitments? Are the ICG taking a big political risk by getting into bed with a Party know for cutting services? Will we see the ICG supporting the privatisation of Council services? Will the ICG agree to cut services in Isleworth and Brentford to fund reductions in parking charges in Chiswick? How long will the Coalition last? I wish them luck, it is important that the good work done by Labour is not destroyed just to settle old scores or because of Tory low tax dogma. We will see..

Alan Sheerins ● 7194d78 Comments

Generally - as a number of people on the forum have acknowledged - things have got off to a sensible start and there are some grounds for optimism.  Last night's Brentford & Isleworth area committee was also very encouraging with good discussion on many issues.  Those that were there may have got bored of me asking why, when the Council has a Sustainability Checklist (which happens to be rather good), it is so rarely used, but I hope the point was made.  When we face growing dangers from climate change it is essential that area committees right the way across the borough start using the sustainability checklist to clarify the social, economic and environmental sustainability of proposals put before us. See http://www.hounslow.gov.uk/sustainability_checklist_spg.docThe debate with regards to HM is an interesting one.  The reality is that local newspaper circulation is very low and the freebies circulation is neither comprehensive nor the most trusted of information sources.  Equally if the new council did away with HM magazine very quickly we would see a proliferation of newsletters from council departments (they need some way of telling the community about their services!).  I used to work in corporate communications and this fragmentation of communications (if there is not a core product like HM) is an often repeated trend in all organisations.Whatever the Tories may have said in their election leaflets there was no pledge to axe HM in their manifesto.  All they said about HM was that they wanted to increase advertising revenue, which seems very sound.Alan says statutory ads should boost revenue.  I understand this is unfortunately not the case.  Ads end up having to be run in other publications (eg. Local press) as statutory ads must be run on successive weeks, which is obviously impossible in a two weekly publication.Some ideas that have come up on this forum (and some of my own) which I will be encouraging the new council to consider are: - would a subscription distribution model be better?  Perhaps people could opt in or out on their council tax notice? Alternatively they could also opt in to an electronic PDF version delivered via email to reduce waste.- the frequency could be reconsidered.  Is every two weeks too often - would a monthly issue suffice?- would an alternative newsprint format be cheaper and easier to recycle?The other valid question that has been raised is about the independence of editorial in HM.  I believe this must also be considered with respect to the council's website.Last autumn when a damning independent report came out about the way the elections office had operated (thankfully it is now improving) the report was buried.  Instead it should have been made fully accessible to the public and media.  For people to trust the local authority the good and sometimes bad news must be reported (along with how the council will learn from its mistakes).Just this week the new (minority) administration has posted a news story about flying the flag in support of the England football team on the council's website.  See http://www.hounslow.gov.uk/index/news_and_events/news/07_june_flying_the_flag.htmThis seems rather too much like self publicity of the Ken Livingstone variety to me.  Why couldn't all councillors and council staff have been invited down for a group photo call?I will be proposing an independent editorial board in this summer's cross-party review of the council's constitution.  I would suggest the board should have a representative from each party, officers and lay persons.  However I would be very interested in ideas from members of this forum – and the wider community - on whether the idea makes sense and what the best model might be?Best regardsAndrew

Andrew Dakers ● 7178d

My dear Vanessa I am in no doubt your post was aimed in my direction, and I can understand why, So I shall endeavour to enlighten you as to why the committee voted for me unanimously. Ivytag is a tenants action group and always has been, it never professed to be a Residents Association. When it was first formed it was formed to take the place of the Estate Management Board which the residents association considered a threat to it's own little unelected political conclave. So when Ivytag was conceived by you know who? it's first task was to insure that anyone regardless of political affiliation, colour, race or creed or sexual orientation would be made welcome. During the years of it's infancy it only had about ten or twelve members. It has alot more now and is continuing to grow slowly but most certainly steady week by week. And not only from the Ivybridge Estate. Since we were locked out of participation with the unelected R.A. we decided to go it alone and the first councillor to recognise it as a quality of being was Councillor Phil Andrews and again since the unelected R.A. continued its lockout it left us little choice but to hitch our waggon to this rising star. All of us in Ivy tag knew it was not if the ICG would grow to make a significant difference, our main concern was how long it would take to get there. I have to admit I was staggered by how quickly the dream became a reality. Didn't we do well? Now that the ICG has a very solid ground-base of supporters, Ivytag is now at liberty to help other R.A.'s if they wish our help in any part of the Borough or even outside it if we choose to do so. As they say the world is now our oyster and we intend to spread our wings and let the chips fall where they may!!!

Simon Anderson ● 7182d

"On what basis can you say the ex ruling party has tried to silence the ICG?"Oh come off it Alan.  Do you really want me to post up the various quotes from officers of your party which immediately followed my election to the council in 1998?  Or "that" letter received from a senior council officer shortly afterwards, of which I sent you a copy at your request but about which no comment was forthcoming?Or the leaflets circulated around Isleworth on polling day in 2002 which described me as "a nasty piece of garbage", or those circulated four years later effectively accusing ICG members of being arsonists and firebombers?Or witness testimony to the appalling things which your candidates and canvassers were saying to potential voters on the doorsteps?Alan, it is down to you and your colleagues to decide upon what strategy you will pursue and to what end.  What you cannot do is make public pronouncements about councillors from certain groups being "pariahs" and talk of "campaigns of non co-operation", and then later accuse the same people of having a persecution complex.I am pleased that you now appear to be taking a more reasoned and constructive approach, and in the fullness of time there may hopefully be room for some kind of dialogue.  I am not a person who bears grudges.  But this will not be achieved simply by rewriting history.  It is a fact and will always remain a fact that for many years Labour's policy towards the community movement in Isleworth was one of confrontation and uncompromising aggression, and that it was this attitude which led to the creation of the ICG, its involvement in the electoral process and ultimately our victory in six seats and your subsequent removal from control of Hounslow Control.My advice, offered with sincerity and in a genuine spirit of friendship and goodwill, is to learn from it and move on.

Phil Andrews ● 7185d

Some of the information in HM is interesting to read - but I often get the impression that the articles are being padded out and that there is not time to write about the subjects in significant detail.  Some information appears to be repeated regularly to pad the magazine out too?  Well that is my impression.  Is it really important to have two issues a month?I can find my way around Hounslow’s web site and there is a lot of information.  The most recent thing I looked at was Libraries - hoping that their opening hours/days would be shown.I wonder if some topics within the site could be listed several times under the various user friendly terms somebody might be trying to look under.I have thought this a couple of times when looking something up - but can't actually remember what the subjects were and where I found them in the end … and maybe its me!  Sorry. Could always call in the plain English people to check and go for an award.I enjoy the Londoner - which I understand has been arriving inside the Estate agents section of the freebie paper it comes with.  I mailed the distribution section and they said it shouldn't be inside the newspaper - but the next one was, just the same.Now I know it is hidden there I can fish it out before discarding the rest of the paper  .... ;-)The shame about The Londoner is it reads as a self publicity magazine for The Mayor and that can be a bit grating.  Is this a po-litical perk of being in office?What do the other members of the London Assembly do as I don’t think I have read anything about what they are up to or achieving … someone else appears to bag all the publicity!

Sarah Felstead ● 7186d

"The ICG blocked the appointment of our own Labour Councillor Matt Harmer to the board of Brentford Dock with a last minute nomination of one of their new Syon Councillors."AlanThis is not untrue, but you have not explained why it was perfectly correct for us to do this.Brentford Dock is in Syon ward.  The local authority appoints Board Members to represent those residents of Brentford Dock who are from the social housing element.  The council's appointees have always, as far I am aware, been Syon ward councillors - for obvious reasons.When we were invited to make nominations we were not advised that there were two posts, and we asked for more information which was not forthcoming.  For reasons which I do not understand somebody somewhere took a unilateral decision to enter Councillor Hardy's name as the sole ICG nominee (we hadn't in fact put any names forward).  Only on the paperwork which was presented to the Borough Council was it indicated that there was a second post, and that the Labour Group had rather cheekily nominated Matt for it.Having discovered that there was a second post we quite understandably nominated a second Syon ward councillor.  Had there been three posts we would have nominated a third.I don't blame the Labour Group for trying it on, but I don't think that in this instance there were really grounds for complaint.  In any event the new administration has been far more generous to opposition councillors in the allocation of places than was the previous one.

Phil Andrews ● 7193d