Forum Topic

For whatever my opinion is worth..I feel that Tom Beaton hasbeen unsatisfactorily treated.In my view,he was asking a perfectly simple question about the constitution and make up of an organisation called the ICSF...and, furthermore, many readers may not be aware of what ICSF stands for. Is a local organisation/group that obviously does good work in the Isleworth ward.Tom was also asking about the hiring situation at the Public Hall in South Street, Isleworth etc etc.Although, Tom may have had a motive for his question, (indeed is he not a member of the Isleworth Baroque..who held an opera there recently?)..he was just looking for plain straightforward facts.Thank goodness that Phil Andrews and Paul Fisher came to the rescue with well written, and informative replies.I feel that Simon failed to answer clearly the question asked..and not for the first time caused chaos and misunderstandings..and a shambles.I had a similar experience recently when I was asking straightforward questions in the new Isleworth TW7 website..which is really George's Blog.  My messages for information were badly answered, incomplete, and finally erased by the Moderator..who was updating his system. Simon resorted to booing me for some reason..and I gave up making any progress there.If you visit the TW7 Forum today..you will find that dear Simon has caused upsets again..with his usual messages and spellings..causing misunderstanding..etc etc and falling out with George over Forum activities etc etc. Basically people are keeping away from that new site...although perhaps looking in to see if there is any hope for the future.It's a pity..as Isleworth is worthy of a good, well structured, and well thought out Website. Sadly the scene is sad.  Thankfully Phil and Paul rescue the situation with good replies...and I'm surprised that they remain so cool about it all..and on this thread too.So, Tom, you did no wrong in my book, you were just responded to by some poor postings...and I know it will continue.

Jim Lawes ● 6889d