'Agreed quality of messages isn't taken into account'No no no Sarah..that wasn't my meaning or intention at all.When listing statistics,there sometimes needs to be a "rider".Many of my own postings,for example, are duplicated because of techie problems, sometimes I leave pictures out,or put wrong ones in..so if one is making a fairly "fair" comparision..certain things need to be taken into account. Dear Angela on the Acton thread,for example again, passed the 300 message mark with some many "blanks" for example.Anyway, I like statistics...especially cricket scores and averages..but there again..someone may have batted brilliantly all day and scored 50 (Atherton once?) whilst someone else might hit 200 batting against dollydrops. Maybe my analogy is not good!.Hasn't Angela done well though to stir up all that interest in cleaning up Acton?So Sarah: an update on the pavements issue perhaps..and get to that magic 300. I'd be livid if I lived your road and witnessed that catalogue of damage and wasted Council money.
Jim Lawes ● 6887d