Forum Topic

""It intrigues me that despite SA not posting on here for a period of time this thread continues to survive.""For many people James...there are "Matters arising"..and the disappearance of the cyberpest for a mere 36 hours is not sufficient time for some of us to recover from the long term mental stress that we have had to endue over so many many months...having the bloke get under our skins. You must be more considerate ;0)As I said before, you are perhaps observing the scene  starting at Chapter 10.It's very difficult to start reporting on the current harvesting of the cereal crops in Osterley Park and the arrival of the first batch of Canadian Geese..with SA mist still around. Nor can I get enthused about taking pictures of Brentford front gardens, or the historic sight of seeing cranes currently demolishing the old Beecham premises on the Great West Road. but hopefully we will recover soon and get this Forum back on it's feet.Agreed we must move on sometime.In response to the Ivytag Chairmanship question though,. it's been clear to me, from responses on this Forum, that key Isleworth Ward contributors have made some indications of their supporting SA..whilst indicating to him that he shouldn't jeopardise the conciliatory progress being made at Ivybridge (re Hounslow Homes).In addition some messages on the Ivytag Forum seem to have been written by other people..but in SA's name to prop up the puppet regime there.That membership list on the Ivytag Forum is worth browsing..if you have the time..as it seems to contain "those" nom de plumes again!By the way..Osterley Park, the House,the Shop, and the farmshop is closed all day on Saturday..as a large Corporate Event is taking place there. Many people will turn up not realising.

Jim Lawes ● 6877d

Jim do you have any evidence of this "continued support" for Anderson as chairman of his resident's group?  Who has made a "decision" to "keep him in that chairmanship"?  Do you know something we don't?It seems to me that with his recent behaviour on this and Tw7 forum his continued existence as "Chair off Ivytag" is untenable and he is probably the only person who won't have worked this out by now.You seem of the view that everyone is opposing your efforts to rid this forum off this virulent cyber pest.  From where I'm sitting the largest majority seems to be supporting you, with only a few questioning the way you have set about it without actually disagreeing with your objective.This clown has admitted to posting fulsome praise of himself under a false name then making up a ludicrous story about bumping into his alter ego in a cafe.  He swore blind at the time that this was not him, now he admits it was, yet he fails to understand why nobody believes him when a "James Thomas" appears on this forum doing precisely the same thing!  An obscenity appears by his name on Tw7 and the moderators identify his IP address, but still he protests that he is being set up.  How can such a dishonest, not to mention stupid person hold a position of responsibility in a resident's group?With a new leadership at the council and, particularly, with Mr. Andrews at the head of Housing surely any injustices against residents on the Ivybridge will automatically be ironed out shortly with or without Ivytag?  Anderson is not only ridiculous, he is superfluous.  I very much doubt whether he's worked that one out either.

Craig Bell ● 6877d

"Its Boring and not fun for everyone on Tw8 to read about me and JL fighting when Tw8 can be used to talk about FAR more interesting stuff"Im sorry if you feel that way, however it is not about the supposed 'fighting' as you call it. (which I dont actually think it is.  I personally think alot of Jim's points and also other peoples points are very valid, and I am not taking sides ok!) Its more to do with the way you have for a very long time conducted yourself, and whether or not it was last year but you yourself have admitted you posted under the name 'Jason Stanely',  but purely to tell everyone just how fantastic you were and all your problems and what you've done.  Do you not feel at all stupid now cos personally I would!  My dad is very ill at the moment, with kidney failure.  He's been in charing X hospital for the last 2 months, has lost about 2.5 stone in that time, he is very poorly and at 65 years of age Im now worried what his quality of life will be like? See, we all have problems of sorts one way or the other but I can assure you this is the only time I will be mentioning it. Do you get my point? You persistanly repeat your life stories ensuring everyone must know about it - why?  The reason I am bothering to reply is that I and Im sure others get frustrated by the way you behave sometimes and your responses and it comes to a point where people won't sit back any longer and say nothing.  And that is exactly what I have chosen to do. Regards,Clo.

Clo Ryan ● 6879d

Morning DanThank you for those kind words it was well appreciated but i just want to forget it now as its not worth it, its just silly and childish 2 adults fighting like School Children we are just showing ourselves up.I would like to be JL friend and the offer will always be there towards him i don't hold grudges and I do respect him but its his right if he doesn't want to be friends with me and i respect his decision.As to how all this happened well all i can say is that I went on Tw7 as a resident posting under my REAL name, there was a posting regd Lights that should be turned off in Blocks on Ivybridge.I posted that it was a fantastic posting but can we discuss it on IVYTAG as IVYTAG is a forum for Ivybridge issues.I then got attacked by the Administrator of the site on there.I privately emailed him to sort it out reasonably, but again i got attacked.So i posted another comment on Tw7 saying fair enough post what you like just to put a end to it but i got attacked again.So i sent a email to the Admin and yes i was wrong to threaten him but i thought it would stop the attacks on IVYTAG and myself but he posted my email on Tw7 and thats when JL got involved, the Admin of Tw7 then continued to stir things up between jL and myself.Then on Wednesday i posted a message thanking the Admin for allowing back 2 residents of TW7 to the forum that was banned just because they were members of my group.My girlfriend and I went to the shops when we came back my posting has disappeared and a nasty word stating with "C" was posted after the Admins comments under my name, i logged on and edited the word and reported i straight away.But then the admin decided to blame me for posting it even though he knew my password and I have 3 witnesses i was in a shop at the time of the posting which to me was a set up to make me look bad.I admit i posted on here as Jason Stanley which at the time was a bit of Fun i did not use that name to attack anyone so I don't see what i did wrong apart from use a false name something I haven't done since, but I did not post the word "c" on tw7.I ca only apologise to everyone on tw8 (inc JL) for posting over a yr ago as Jason Stanley and it Hasnt and wont happen again.It is clear that the instigator of all this was the Admin of Tw7 who you all know VERY well as he was banned from here for attacking people on here who also this yr posted under "account Suspended" something Jl has not said anything about but just praises this guy up, but i do it he has a go at me...I do want to put an end to this and if there is ANYONE who has doubts about me i would like to say come meet me and get to know me I am a very nice person who always put others first don't judge me because 1 person doesn't like me please"Thanks EveryoneSimon

Simon Anderson ● 6879d

It has been quite surprising to see how two apparently quite decent individuals can fall out with each other quite spectacularly. I'm sure many people will share my amazement that the sensible avuncular figure of Jim could exercise such a passionate hatred for anyone, particularly someone as amiable and well-meaning as Simon.It is not at all apparent exactly what Simon has done to warrant such bile. The Jason Stanley thing was totally obvious at the time so there seems to be no reason to resurrect it now. It was a daft thing to do but I would imagine most people would do daft things if their mind was mainly preoccupied with the health of their child. Surely misusing the forum to say good things (even about oneself) is preferable to misusing to abuse others as many of Simon's enemies have done (not Jim I might add whose behaviour may be surprising but his integrity remains above question.)There may be something we are not being told about Simon or some dreadful deed he has committed but from the outside it looks like he has simply fallen out with his erstwhile friends.  Being outside the gilded circle he now seems to have become subject to venomous attacks from those within it. This is fascinating as a study of pack behaviour but quite tragic when one remembers we are talking about a real person, with all too real problems which have just been compounded by the loss of a friendship network which has suddenly become a scourge. Even if there is more to this we are not hearing about please could this dispute be taken elsewhere. It is grimly fascinating but one man is being stripped of his dignity and others are starting to reveal a darker side to their characters most wouldn't have thought existed.

Dan Evans ● 6879d

""hey why not get a life and give THE GUY A BRAKE??""Thank you James Thomas.Let me assure you that I do have a life..and much more expansive that you'd ever imagine. In addition,I've been running a busy business for the past 33 years..meeting lots and lots of people.To say that I am a "sad little man" is a ridiculous statement.  This current saga about SA is to do with his performance on the new TW7 Forum with George. I was most keen to help see it grow as an informative and intesrting Forum Site. To see CHAIRMAN, chairman,chairman, plastered everywhere I thought was not a good omen,,and when simple questions were poorly answered, and later followed by abuse..I could quickly see the the developement of TW7 was to be hampered by such idiotic scribblings.I've been told by one of the "Isleworth group", that SA is irrepressible...and that seems to be the case again.A year ago SA was a pest on this Forum also.... starting up nearly 20% of all new TOPICS..and you can imagine the overview of those.  Of course SA wants to drop the subject..he just wants to carry on in the same old way.If George has kicked SA off his TW7 site..there must be a good reason for that....but most of those startling messages have been deleted by George.  SA is a cyberspace pest.I am not a sad little man..and I am not a bully..I'm just passionately keen (but not overly) to see TW7 recover...and for TW8 to continue uncluttered.  Hopefully people will have got the message by now..and the infamous SA will take note. But I'm sure he won't.

Jim Lawes ● 6880d

I so happen to be around at this late hour having been doing some study on the internet.Mr James Thomas, in his maiden message, seems to be writing in the same style at SA..so I wouldn't be surprised if they were once again..one and the same person!! If they are not..well then my apologies.The matter of Jason Stanley is of much concern to me. Whilst it may have happen many months ago..it has only just clicked following other peoples postings. The dreadful error of SA's on the Farmers Market thread to submit a message in the name of Jason Stanley by mistake..thus giving away his cover was just a joke. And then for him to disgracefully to come up with some untrue story that it was all a misunderstanding with some chap at the Bridge Cafe..is just an affront to this Forum and its readers.This kind of use of the Forum surely breaks the rules and added to all the other criticisms of his cyberspace behavior adds up to something not too good.His many postings in the name of Jason Stanley praising himself may be funny to some but,having just twigged on the deception, I judge it to be dishonest.As a Forum prowler..who pleads for our money for his Charity work..he should be seen white as white. When a Forum poster asked SA if he kept accounts on one occasion the question was answered typically with abuse.SA should be censured.  For you maiden posting James I'm surprised you have sided with someone who discredits this Forum..and other Forums too..and suggest that you read some of the detailed complaints more carefully.The errors in your English text suggests that you're SA up to your tricks again. I will not be reading any replies from  SA. I have deposited his name in Room 101.PS: How SA can be seen as a Chairman of a Resident's group begs belief.The reason I am going on about it..is that I've just realised what scam has been written by SA. He also seems to have a wonderful resiliance to complaints and neither takes notice or heeds hints.Explain how I can be a ""hippocrite""?So, in response to your request:""So Mr. Lawes how about it, give it a rest now we've herd enuff off yr criticsm now.""I suggest that you should be prepared to hear more complaints.Did SA not ask about what we felt about the launch of the TW7 Forum. And what were his responses?

Jim Lawes ● 6881d