Forum Topic

Mr Hughes,You finally responded!This was a thread started by a lady making an enquiry about a drinks licence at Boston Manor.  Only the likes of you could use it as an opportunity to make disgusting insinuations and accusations about something that is not only untrue but also completely irrelevant to the thread in question.Your presumption in your previous posting is not well founded because I do not accept your apology.  You were irresponsible and nasty enough to state what you did, and pass it as though it were factual.  You did this despite not having any evidence.  The only reason you are offering an apology is because you have been exposed.Of the five questions I put to you, only 4 & 5 have been answered.  My first three questions are unanswered.  It will be interesting to see whether you are prepared to answer these, especially as some of your accusations remain.  When you answer number (3), you may wish to explain how the "campaign" has been manifested?In addition, I challenge you to answer the following:6. Which edition (i.e. date) of the Chronicle contained an article where I made a comment on this?It does not surprise me that the so called, "original person", has not yet gone public on any of his allegations against me.  He is clearly unpleasant enough to believe what he wishes, irrespective of the consequences.  However, he is not as daft as you to think he can pass various falsehoods on forums as being the truth.  Or is he an imaginary friend and these are really your endeavours alone?As for my previous fellow Councillors in Feltham North, they will have to try it on before I believe what you say about them.  I bet you that they would not be able to produce one example where I have done what you have accused me of.Finally, to regular users of brentfordtw8, these are exchanges that are not good for any forum.  I hope that if anyone makes reference to this exchange, they will accept that there was need for my participation in this thread in order make others aware that the allegations made against me were just lies.  No other person that I am aware of has made these allegations against the "Conservative colleague" and I.

Cllr Mark Bowen ● 6862d

Without knowing any of the facts of this particular matter, I would be interested to read Dave Hughes' response.  Knowing Councillor Nark Bowen as I do I would be extremely surprised if there was a grain of truth in this allegation.Taken in conjunction with the "ICG council officer hitlist" nonsense which has appeared on other threads, one wonders whether Dave's dramatic reappearance on this forum after a prolonged absence is indicative of something more sinister than simply the realisation by an outspoken ex-councillor that he suddenly has a lot of time on his hands.We have seen in recent years that smears and unsubstantiated accusations comprise an integral part of the Labour Party's political armoury in these parts.  However, with the imminent exposure of the "racist ICG" lie through our organisation's inclusion in the new administration one wonders whether this uniquely unprincipled local party has identified a need to look further afield for muck-raking opportunities.Working on the basis that there will always be some who believe there to be "no smoke without fire", is it being possible that Dave Hughes has been set up by certain of his more cerebral colleagues to front some of the more ridiculous allegations which his party has managed to dream up?  Allegations which, if they go belly-up, can be dumped unceremoniously at Dave's door without leaving a paper trail back to the party itself?I too would like to see Dave Hughes' response to Councillor Bowen's questions, but I would also be keen to learn the views of our regular Labour Party correspondents.  Any volunteers?

Phil Andrews ● 6865d