Forum Topic

As I understand it, the Bill has become law and Hounslow could ask to create a breed of traffic officers to police moving traffic offences (and do other things) on their roads and the GLA could also ask to create traffic officers for their roads !!However, it seems that most local authorities are in the phase of implementing 2003 legislation allowing them to enforce parking and traffic offences using CCTV. I had missed the news in hm in June : Say Cheese! You’re On Camera!If you drive in a bus lane, park where restrictions are in force, or fail to obey a traffic sign, you could be caught on camera and fined.Hounslow Council will use CCTV to enforce a variety of contraventions under the London Local Authorities Act 1996 (as amended) and the London Local Authorities and ransport for London Act 2003.If your vehicle is caught on camera contravening bus lane enforcement, parking restrictions or traffic signs, the council is authorised to issue a penalty charge notice to whoever seems to be the vehicle owner.The enforcement of minor moving traffic contraventions through the use of CCTV will begin from 29 June.To avoid receiving a penalty charge notice, make sure you obey the traffic signs and restrictions that may be in operation.hm 15th June 2006and I also was interested in this snippet from the School Travel Plan news in Feb 2006:Recent changes in legislation have meant the responsibility for enforcing some minor Moving Traffic Contraventions (illegal manoeuvres) has moved from the police to the borough. School Keep Clear markings (which are backed up with a traffic order and a road side time plate (see below) will be enforceable in this way.  Hounslow is currently in the process of applying for funding and permission to commence enforcement. This will be done primarily via remotely monitored CCTV cameras, and, in the first instance, will be carried out through existing installations.  If this pilot is successful, bids will be made to purchase demountable wireless cameras that would move around from school to school. These cameras would be mounted on a lamp column or other piece of suitable street furniture.Additionally, as this project is being progressed as a joint partnership project with Community Crime and Safety, the cameras will also be available for use by the police service in the interest of crime prevention.  At the present time the fine for Moving Traffic Contraventions is £100, reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days. school travel plan newsletter feb 2006

Tim Henderson ● 6806d

"Improvements for cyclists and pedestrians also feature in the scheme"I've accessed your Hounslow web address but found the published maps difficult to read.  The libraries of Chiswick and Brentford don't appear to have the "letters and plans" which were circulated.From a cyclists perspective the eastbound bus lane for cyclists, taxis and buses does have an advantage - as does the road re-surfacing - over the current situation.  The westbound 1.2m cycle lane has only a marginal advantage as it extends current cycle lane by only 20cm (or 40cm in places) width. In the Brentford area Hounslow has nothing to be proud of in its help to cyclists on road.  This road in question has existing east/west cycling lanes of 80cm-1m width from pavement.  The general UK minimum was 1.5m dropping in recent years to 1.2m with the UK/Europe recommendation being 1.5m - 2m.  The motorists use these cycle lanes as an exact left border for their cars with a proportion cutting in.  My cycle has handlebar width of 45cm.  With body and panniers this rises to 60cm leaving only 20cm width to existing lanes or 60cm to proposed west.  This is a threat to cyclists.Although you say the road could be widened but with no effect to the bottlenecked total traffic thru-put the widening would ease the danger put on cyclists by vehicles passing too close for a considerable distance.So don't award youself or Mayor Ken any plaudits for efforts in reducing the road-dangers to cyclists.  Have local cycling groups been consulted?

Michael Fletcher ● 6806d

Andrew:“How does the Council decide which roads should have bus lanes?”We look at stretches of road where there are high numbers of buses, significant delays to buses, and enough space to potentially implement a bus lane.“Why is this bus lane 24 hrs?  Why not relieve congestion in the afternoons by restricting the hours of operation from 7 to 11 i.e. the busiest period in the morning.”I mentioned earlier in this thread that bus priority schemes are designed to reduce travel times for bus passengers and to make bus arrival and journey times more reliable in the face of varying levels of traffic congestion.  While delays are usually worst in the peak direction in the peak periods (inwards in the morning, outwards in the evening), there are often contrapeak delays as well, caused by high use of the road network.  Even in the interpeak and in the evenings and weekends there can be severe delays, caused by road works, accidents, special events etc, and this is where bus priority is particularly useful in helping to keep the buses to timetable, saving intending passengers further downstream from the frustration and uncertainty of wondering when their bus will arrive and avoiding the need to cancel services because the bus is still stuck on its previous trip.Also, if the general traffic lane can cope with the traffic in the peak, it can cope in the off-peak, so reassigning the bus lane back to general traffic use outside of peak hours is of relatively little benefit to other road users.  Indeed, most London motorists are now accustomed to staying out of bus lanes at all times, and having a part-time bus lane is often an invitation to a small percentage of motorists to use the bus lane (outside of bus lane hours) to undertake some high speed “under-taking”, which often leads to conflict when the bus lane ends or when a driver in the general traffic lane tries to turn left.  And,  bus lanes give space for cyclists, who of course are not just about in peak hours.“Will the queue of traffic going towards Brentford centre be longer with the introduction of this lane?”We are not proposing removing a traffic lane, just adding a bus lane.  This will allow buses to come to the front of the queue at the approach to Brentford Bridge, so there should be no increase in the general queue length, as at any given time there is currently likely to be a bus somewhere in the queue, if not at the front.  Ultimately, if more people use the buses and fewer use cars, queues should reduce.“How has this bus lane been assessed regarding its effect on local air pollution levels?  Pinching the traffic at the already busy Commerce Road junction must make the pollution problem worse?  I know the arguments in terms of encouraging bus use giving an overall improvement but is this at the expense of those directly awaken to the bus lane.”For the reasons given above, I don’t believe there is any net effect on local air pollution but hopefully a gradual move to more sustainable travel will ultimately lead to cleaner air.

Chris Calvi-Freeman ● 6806d