Forum Topic

"...it can make you very unpopular as you are finding out - you cannot be all things to all people when tough decisions have to be made, or abdicate your part in that process, that is disingenuous and cowardly..."Whilst I believe that you've badly misread the local political mood Vanessa your apparent belief that the ICG is "very unpopular" would explain the rationale behind the current campaign on Ivybridge, which would seem to include various personages once pleaded by yourself to be "non political" unfurling the proverbial Jolly Roger and emerging gingerly from the closet.  My personal view is that you have all made a very fundamental error of judgement, but I guess time will tell one way or the other.Vanessa, Conal lives in Brentford in a place where the ICG is not a major force and thus has some excuse for being ignorant of the ICG's modus operandi.  You on the other hand have been central to the debate and deeply involved in the issues which led to the Group's creation and growth.  Indeed you, as much as anybody, were responsible for it coming into being.  You have no such excuse.Other than running you through it with a blackboard and a piece of chalk I don't know what else I can do to explain to you the way in which we work.  Yes, we are easy coalition partners and if it suits you to believe that that is because we lack the common sense or the fight to stand up for ourselves or to understand what is going on around us then so be it.  Quite how you reconcile this with the "sinister hidden agenda" theory which you have spent so many years propagating and have yet to disown is anyone's guess, but frankly that's your problem to deal with.There must be someone, somewhere in the ranks of the Labour Party who will be contemplating how little they would have had to sacrifice to still be running the council, but that is all history now.  Even I have difficulty coming to terms with the fact that controlling a few residents' groups is as important to them as it appears to be.  I must at least give them credit for their uncompromising pursuit of their objectives, no matter how divorced they might be from those of their political forefathers and how deeply rooted they are in their own collective insecurity.

Phil Andrews ● 6653d

Jim - Conal doesn't seem to me to be the kind of man who would allow the facts to get in the way of a good rant.  And the facts about the Watermans are just that - the "cut" of which he speaks is quite simply the cessation of a £60k spend which has been additional to its annual grant of £180k, and which has run its intended course.Conal - as you seem to have be in the throes of furor scribendi this morning I am not going to respond to each of your many individual postings but will, if you'll forgive me, use this one to respond to what would appear to be their common theme - that I have ignored your questions.If you take a look back through this and other associated threads you will see that I have not ignored your postings.  What it would appear you actually mean is that I have not given you the answer that you want to hear.  I have tried, painstakingly, to explain to you what informs the ICG's involvement in local politics and what informs our entering into coalition with the Conservatives.  You have ignored this completely in your determination to pursue your point about culture.The fact is, and remains, that it has always been within the gift of the main opposition party to change the political set-up in Hounslow and thus to block the savings contained in the recent budget which it affected to oppose so passionately (despite the fact that it made far deeper and more insensitive cuts itself when in office).  The plain, demonstrable fact is that maintaining its control-freakery on our estates and in our communities is more important to New Labour in Hounslow even than being in office and running the administration.For this reason, regardless of the fact that I obviously do not share your view, if you truly believe that the current administration should be replaced then I believe your anger would more appropriately be directed at the main opposition party.

Phil Andrews ● 6653d

ConalI don't know much about CPA ratings, but is the following untrue,(Courtesy of Hounslow.gov website) perhaps some knowledgeable soul can elucidate? I dont hold a brief for the ICG/Conservative administration, but on the face of it would appear to be acceptable...Do you?Hounslow retains 3-star ratingThu, 22 February 2007The Audit Commission has awarded Hounslow Council three out of a possible four stars in its annual report into the performance of local authorities today (Thursday, 22 February 2007).The Commission’s Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) rates how well councils are delivering services for local people, and also identifies their capacity for continuous improvement. Hounslow was found to be improving well”, and is in a good position to carry on improving the services it provides for its residents.Hounslow’s Leader, Cllr Peter Thompson, said: "This is very good news for Hounslow, as it means that the Council has been delivering high quality services to local people and that, working in partnership with others, we have the potential to keep improving services even further."We intend to build on this through the new administration’s commitments as set out in the Hounslow Plan, our four-year vision for the borough.”The Council retained its 3-star rating despite being assessed under The Harder Test, introduced in 2005 as a more challenging framework designed to encourage further sustained improvement.The CPA includes corporate assessments, use of resources assessments and individual service assessments which look at services such as adult social care, children and young people’s services, and environment.Inspectors who carried out Hounslow’s assessment said that the Council had "made good progress in priority areas, such as planning, housing management, and educational attainment at GCSE level, with significant improvements in adult social care services”.They found that the authority "works well with its partners”, "continues to focus on areas where further improvements are required”, and "makes good use of its resources, and has made significant efficiency savings and delivers good value for money”.In addition, they said that overall, "two-thirds of key performance indicators have improved”, and that "user focus and diversity are strengths for the Council, and are used effectively to help shape and deliver services to meet identified community needs.”CPA 2006 also includes council-specific data from a user satisfaction survey carried out by the Audit Commission.Hounslow’s Lead member for Service Improvement, Cllr Genevieve Hibbs, said: "The results from the user satisfaction survey are particularly rewarding because at the end of the day, we are here to provide the best possible service for our residents."However, we are not complacent, and there is always room for further improvement."The new administration has made a commitment to ensure that the Council provides value-for-money, high performance and quality services, and we will continue to review and improve services even more, in order to achieve the highest possible level of resident satisfaction.”

w John Michael Atkinson ● 6661d