Forum Topic

Is this connected to the 'The Sustainable Communities Bill'? See:http://www.localworks.org/?q=node/37"On Friday 15th June the Sustainable Communities Bill passed through the House of Commons. The Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords and if successful there it will have started a process of ‘bottom-up’ government that hopefully signifies the end of the ‘Whitehall-knows-best’ variety of politics that we have all endured for too long under central and local governments of all political persuasions.The Sustainable Communities Bill will, if it passes through the House of Lords, require the government to publish and implement action plans to reverse community decline. But those action plans will be like no others in existence or even thought of - until now! Before deciding on the measures to implement the Secretary of State MUST (not may):Invite suggestions from all councils on how best to build sustainable communities in their locality – nothing new there, but read on… Co-operate with the Local Government Association (LGA), as the representative body for local government, on which suggestions put forward from councils should be short-listed and acted on – i.e. not just the usual top-down duty to consult. Publish a breakdown for each council area of spending by government agencies, quangos or any other body with a public function. On the basis of these spending breakdowns, consider, with a presumption in favour of acceptance, requests from councils for a transfer of functions and resources to them from those agencies. Report annually to Parliament on progress of the action plan. But the ‘power sharing’ goes right down to local communities. Before submitting any suggestions council must not just consult their communities but must (again, not may) also:Set up representative citizens panels to establish mechanisms to involve communities Try to reach agreement (i.e. not just consult) with those panels in making suggestions for government action. Consider the best way to involve the most disengaged and dispossessed sections of the community"The Ecologist seems keen:http://www.theecologist.org/archive_detail.asp?content_id=839

Duncan Walker ● 6593d

Thank you for all the ideas/issues raised so far.  I will be planning my contribution to the Councillors Commission early next week with Lib Dem colleagues and will bear all the comments in mind.In the meantime I thought I would share this generic "job profile" that London Councils Remuneration Panel has come up with for councillors, as well as their list of examples of good practice in reporting.  Let me know your thoughts.  I wonder how well aligned it is to the new demands that the recent local gov't whitepaper seeks to put on councillors?  See:http://www.communities.gov.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=1504100AndrewOn behalf of the community – a job profile for councillorsPurposes:1. To participate constructively in the good governance of the area.2. To contribute actively to the formation and scrutiny of the authority’s policies, budget, strategies and service delivery.3. To represent effectively the interests of the Ward for which the councillor was elected, and deal with constituents’ enquiries and representations.4. To champion the causes which best relate to the interests and sustainability of the community and campaign for the improvement of the quality of life of the community in terms of equity, economy and environment.5. To represent the council on an outside body, such as a charitable trust or neighbourhood association.Key Tasks:1. To fulfil the statutory and local determined requirements of an elected member of a local authority and the authority itself, including compliance with all relevant codes of conduct, and participation in those decisions and activities reserved to the full Council (e.g. Setting budget, overall priorities, strategy).2. To participate effectively as a member of any Committee or Panel to which the councillor is appointed, including related responsibilities for the services falling within the Committee’s (or Panel’s) terms of reference, human resource issues, staff appointments, fees and charges, and liaison with other public bodies to promote better understanding and partnership working.3. To participate in the activities of an outside body to which the Councillor is appointed, providing two-way communication between the organisations.  Also, for the purpose, to develop and maintain a working knowledge of the authority’s policies and practices in relation to that body and of the community’s needs and aspirations in respect of that body’s role and functions.4. To participate in the scrutiny or performance review of the services of the authority including where the authority so decides, the scrutiny of policies and budget, and their effectiveness in achieving the strategic objectives of the authority.5. To participate, as appointed, in the area – and service-based consultative processes with the community and with other organisations.6. To represent the authority to the community, and the community to the authority, through the various forums available.7. To develop and maintain a working knowledge of the authority’s services, management arrangements, powers/duties, and constraints, and to develop good working relationships with relevant officers of the authority.8. To develop and maintain a working knowledge of the organisations, services, activities and other factors which impact upon the community’s well-being and identity.9. To contribute constructively to open government and democratic renewal through active encouragement to the community to participate generally in the government of the area.10. To participate in the activities of any political group of which the councillor is a member.11. To undertake necessary training and development programmes as agreed by the authority.12. To be accountable for his/her actions and to report regularly on them in accessible and transparent ways.(My comments in brackets - Andrew)Examples of good practice in reporting- Publication of attendance records for formal council and committee meetings. (Already happens in Hounslow.)- Reports to Area Committee meetings by members on local activity. (Happens on an ad hoc basis - could be more systematic?)- Reports to Council by Cabinet Members. (Not yet happening systematically)- Cabinet Members report on a regular basis to the Overview & Scrutiny Committee or relevant thematic panel. (I think this does happen)- Cabinet Members’ performance is open to question through written and oral questions at full council meetings. (Written questions and sometimes oral against a tabled report are already happening in Hounslow.)- The Leader presents a state of the borough address to full council. (Not yet happening in Hounslow)- Members have time to speak at council meetings about what they have been doing. (There is a general announcements section on Hounslow's full council agenda - I think area committees are better used for this)- The council website hosts a monthly schedule of councillors’ activities. (Hounslow Calendar already exists)- Each councillor has their own web-page on which to record their activities. (This facility is available but I dont think any councillor has taken it up - a few of us have websites independent of the council which are not politically restricted)- Members report back on what they have achieved in relation to their work programmes for Cabinet and Scrutiny. (Happens on an ad hoc basis?)- Cabinet and Ward Members report back to meetings of local residents. (Happens on an ad hoc basis - not systematically)- Cabinet Members provide monthly reports of their activities to the Mayor. (Doesn't happen in Hounslow)

Andrew Dakers ● 6595d

I found this article which is discussing some issues on this:"A new approach to persuading local talent to serve on councilsBy Paul Wheeler*9 February 2007: After decades of neglect the issue of where to find local councillors has become a burning topic in England. The UK government and the Local Government Association have announced a commission to be chaired by Jane Roberts, former leader of Camden Council in London, to look at the barriers and incentives into serving as a councillor.As a long standing advocate of local democracy I welcome this interest and not only because I have just finished a report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation into how the main political parties in England recruit councillor candidates. Local democracy desperately needs confident and capable advocates as local councillors if we are ever to shake off the shackles of national targeting and prescription.So how are to capture the imagination of the best and brightest in our localities that not only attracts them into the council chamber but encourages them to stay there and resist the bright lights of national politics.Well fundamental to any change are the main political parties. Over 90 per cent of existing councillors are members of the main political parties in England. But (and it’s a big but) if our political parties are going to retain their monopoly of local politics they have to do much more to prove it is for the public good. Since the collapse of communism the main political parties in England are the last bastion of centralism. The concept of democratic centralism is alive and living well in London! So the first step is that the main political parties have to learn to let go and encourage more innovation and risk-taking in their local organisations.Apart from anything else we have to recognise that there is a ‘missing generation’ of 25-50 year olds in our council chambers and have to ask how the political parties can attract them.My report ‘Local Talent’ indicates five strategies for local parties to adopt to become more inclusive and efficient as recruiters.The first is the simplest but also the most radical. Simply put, local parties should openly advertise for candidates. All parties currently operate a ‘closed selection’ system, which simply excludes all but the most active of members. Open advertisement allows more party supporters and voters to be considered as candidates. It happens already. Ealing Conservatives advertised in their local paper for candidates for the May elections. Far from creating problems they are now running the council!Secondly we need to ask the parties to be more transparent in their selection processes. Traditionally councillors have been categorised as the 3R’s (rich, retired and redundant). Well in the modern age we need a new set of categories – ‘Representative, Reliable and Reputable’ on which we can judge existing and potential councillors. Here some care. Local Political Parties are voluntary organisations who guard their independence well not least from their national parties! So we have to lead by example and encourage local parties to change and create a momentum for improvement.As part of this momentum we need to promote and define the role of councillor more effectively to a much wider audience. I don’t think I can exaggerate the degree of current ignorance and confusion that exists about the current role of councillors. In a recent MORI survey 40 per cent of the population of Birmingham had simply no idea what councillors actually did. We need a high profile ‘mission to inform’ that can attract the best into this role and also challenge some of the cynicism that pervades the national debate on local councillors.The fourth strategy is to promote Civic Pride. Whilst it is true that the vast majority of councillors are members of political parties for a large number membership is often a means to an end. We have allowed the civic role of councillors to be undervalued in recent years and we need to create a vibrant local political culture. For instance we have a Parliamentarian of the Year Award but no equivalent for local councillors. There is no local equivalent of the Hansard Society or Industry and Parliament Trust.The current debate on place-shaping as part of the recent White Paper ‘Strong and Prosperous Communities’ is putting more focus on the community leadership role of councillors. There is a real opportunity to attract into local politics those who want to improve their own localities and have no great desire to move off to the ‘Westminster Village’.And so on to our final strategy. Put simply if we want to attract the ‘missing generation’ we have to change the way that councillors work and the demands that local government places on them. Councillors with jobs and families will have to be better supported in the future. Critical to this is to pay a living wage to those who seek the councillor role especially at senior levels.But we have to be careful about the money. Many talented and ambitious people may want to be councillors for a time but not at the expense of their families and overall careers. We need to make sure that we attract those into local politics as part of their civic duties and not necessarily as career politicians. In particular we have to change the perception of being a councillor from being a ‘career destroyer’ to being a ‘career developer’ for those of working ageNone of this will be easy and there are hundreds of reasons why local political parties and councils won’t change. There are big implications for the LGA, IDeA and Leadership Centre in how they support the elected member role. But if we are serious about challenging the central state and providing effective local leadership sustained change is vital.Paul Wheeler is Director of the Political Skills Forum – an independent advocacy organisation for local councillors. You can download the full report ‘Local Talent’ on www.politicalskills.com"There are also a couple of reports on his website discussing it further:"How to bring on the best"http://www.politicalskills.com/index.php?id=22"Political recruitment"http://www.politicalskills.com/index.php?id=21

Duncan Walker ● 6607d

I agree with Valerie Lamey.Being a councillor is a form of public service and should not be seen as a substitute for a full time job.Hounslow and the taxpayers simply could not afford to have 60 full-time councillors being paid £40,000 a year - which is the minimal salary anyone in London with the qualifications, experience and ability to be a councillor should expect. The cost of paying every councillor in the country a full-time salary would be horrific and we would be saddled with an even bigger political careerist nomenklatura than we have now.As it is the public sector in this country is growing at a horrendous rate under Gordon Brown, the Real Prime Minister for the past 10 years.There is an increasing trend for more and more political positions- not just in Parliament but in local councils and at every level of Government - to be filled by people, like Andrew Dakers, who works for an organisation of which I am a member, and who are in effect full-time politicans in one form or another almost from the cradle to the grave. Or at least from school to retirement to the House of Lords !Such people often lack any experience of the lives lived by their constituents and have no experience in business, in management, in social service, in housing issues, in education, in planning or in their local communities before moving from school to university and then into some pressure group, campaigning organisation, think tank, charity, politican's office or national or local government before casting around for a safe council, national assembly, parliamentary or European Parliament seat.I am no great admirer of Ann Keen but at least she had an honest career as a nurse before entering politics.Similarily her four Tory opponents at the last five general electoions all had extensive experience of life outside politics before entering politics. Mary Macleod, the current Conservative Prospective Parliamentary candidate, has had an impressive career in business and social service.Mr Dakers shoiuld consider this and gain more experience of life outside politics before standing for election.In view of the importance of voting Ann Keen (or her successor as the Labour candidate) out of Parliament at the next election, the Liberal Democrats should forgo any futile attempt to win this seat and concentrate their efforts on defending Susan Kramer's tenuous hold on Richmond which otherwise Green Zac Goldsmith will definitely win back for the Conservatives. Otherwise there is a danger that the Lib Dems will hand this seat again to Labour as they have done at the last General Election.

David Giles ● 6610d