Forum Topic

History :  Duke of Cumberland in Brentford? Inverness Lodge?

Inverness Lodge, Boston Manor Road is topical at the moment..having, as you may know, opened their doors,socially for one night, to Forum readers and all!!There is a history there...worthy of investigating I believe and I'm wondering if the Forum's very capable researchers are able to help. Kevin thinks it was built in the 1830's for a toff. I've read that it was built for a top toff(!) the Duke of Cumberland.... but which one..there were several of them over the years?One Duke of Cumberland led the King's Army in defeating the Scots at Culloden in 1746. When did he die?  CULLODEN is close to INVERNESS and Inverness is close to the area/Glen called STRATHERRICK.STRATHERRICK was the home too of Lord LOVAT (Simon Fraser) who had property in Chiswick apparently and in Heston also (according to Andrea Cameron)..indeed they is an estate of houses in Cranford Lane called LOVAT WALK.Lord Lovatt was active at CULLODEN..wasn't he on both sides? He finished up being painted by William Hogarth (there's a Hogarth Court also in Cranford Lane)..before being beheaded at the Tower of London.One of the Dukes of Cumberland was a top Mason in the UK too..who wasn't it seems!!  So: INVERNESS LODGE so named because of?And: Which Duke of Cumberland and dates?Then we can extend the story with pictures and URL's no doubt..so that we have a chance to be better informed about dear BRENTFORD and the INVERNESS LODGE!  

Jim Lawes ● 6451d23 Comments

I also found this in the Wikepedia entry for Hanwell Asylum:"MuseumReverend H A Norris, (a former chaplain to the hospital) realized in the early 1980s that there were still old records at hospital which were historically important and should join the others in the Greater London Council Records Library (now part of the National Archives). He feared these would be thrown out by staff who did not appreciate their historical value. Getting little cooperation from the then hospital management, a dedicated band of volunteers formed the 'Museum Committee' to help. They searched out, recovered and thus saved much of the hospital heritage. This also included mechanical restraints, ECT machines, some of the old fixtures and fitting. The largest item by far was an original 'seclusion room' with leather covered straw padding walls and floor. Also on display was a letter written by Arthur O'Connor. He had been committed to Hanwell on May 6th 1875 for firing an unloaded pistol at Queen Victoria earlier on the 29th February.[37] The purpose of writing was to petition for his release; which was granted on the 16th November 1876. He never came to the attention of the authorities again.Mention should here also be made of the work of long time administrative staff member Pauline May, without whose tireless work in the 1990s, much of the museum artifacts would have been lost for ever.Despite its growing reputation and size (taking up the whole of the available space in the disused church), the lack of any fiscal recognition made it impossible to provide staff to assist the many visitors who wished to view and study the collection. Therefore, it has now been dispersed to, and can be seen at:Bethlem Royal Hospital Museum. [3] London Metropolitan Archives Wellcome Trust Gunnersbury Park Museum. [4]

Duncan Walker ● 6451d

Inverness House was in the news in 1858 as the place where Lady Rosina Bulwer Lytton was committed by her husband.Rosina Doyle Bulwer-Lytton (4 November 1802 - 12 March 1882), née Wheeler, wrote and published fourteen novels, a volume of essays and a volume of letters. Her husband was Edward Bulwer-Lytton, a novelist and politician. They were divorced in 1836 and what followed was an acrimonious relationship in public. This public slanging match even caused Prime Minister Disraeli to send the following letter 8/6/1858 to Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton about his wife:“ To: Sir Edward Bulwer LyttonMy dear Bulwer,I thought you had tamed the tigress of Taunton – but unhappily, this is not the case.She is writing letters to your colleagues & friends, of an atrocious description, such as I thought , no woman could have penned, accusing you of nameless crimes, at least which only can be named by her, & threatening aggravated hostilities.This is not very pleasant to your friends: I should think, hardly, to yourself.What can be the explanation? Is it possible, that your agent has been so negligent, or so imprudent, as to leave her allowance in arrear?Yours ever, Disraeli” In June 1858, when her husband was standing as parliamentary candidate for Hertfordshire, she appeared at the hustings and indignantly denounced him. On 23/6/1858, Edward Bulwer Lytton had her committed on grounds of insanity to Dr Gardiner Hill’s private nursing home, Inverness Lodge, Brentford. The resulting public outcry, particularly the Daily Telegraph’s demand on 17th July for an enquiry, frightened Lytton’s colleagues with a damaging scandal and resulted in her release on 17 July.This was chronicled in her book 'A Blighted Life'. (still on sale at Amazon for £20). For years she continued her attacks upon her husband's character; she would outlive him by nine years.[extracts from: Wikipedia and Benjamin Disraeli Letters: 1857-1859 By Benjamin Disraeli, M. G. Wiebe, J. A. W. Gunn]Maybe the current owners could use this story and Rosina’s book in their marketing?!!!

Duncan Walker ● 6451d

Here’s a description of a new patent for a fire-escape installed at the Inverness Lodge in 1861, for the then owner a Dr. E. Gardiner Hill. I wonder if it is still there?form 'The Year-book of Facts in Science and Art' by John Timbs 1861, page 116:“NEW PATENT FIRE-ESCAPE. DR. E. GARDINER HILL, of Inverness Lodge, Brentford, has introduced a Fire-Escape which consists of a rectangular framing of wood, bound together by means of tie rods. The bottom part of this frame is formed of a lattice-work of thin iron. One side of the frame is made with a half door, to afford facility for getting out of the escape. The frame is covered at the bottom and round the sides with non-inflammable canvas. A ring is securely fastened to the floor or window-sill of the house, and to this ring is simply hooked the end of a chain carrying a block through which the tackle of the escape is rove. The whole of the tackle and block are kept inside the frame when the escape is not in use, the hooking of the block-chain to the ring being the only thing to be done when the escape is required to be brought into use. The lowering rope is thrown to the persons below, or the occupant of the escape may lower himself by its means. The escape is then hauled up to bring down other persons, or for removing property from the upper part of a dwelling. The frame of the escape is fitted with castors on the inner side, and when not in use it stands upon them, and is covered with an ornamental drapery, which converts the escape into a convenient ottoman. It can be used also as a dressing-table; for which purpose it is placed on its side, and fitted with a loose deal top and muslin hangings in place of the cushion. In this way the fire-escape may at all times be kept near the window, from whence it would be used if required.—Builder.”

Duncan Walker ● 6451d