Forum Topic

What does we spend our money on.....

So says the headline in HM magazine in the budget statement for all of Housnlow to read at least I have the excuse of being dyslexic, what theirs...Getting it down wid the Kids init!!!!!Time to hug a hoodie again because thay ain't spendin it on Education..INIT.

Dave Hughes ● 6383d38 Comments

Dave Hughes ● 6381d

SteveOne can only hope, but looking at his past comments, I very much doubt that he will. Just think, this idiot was elected and made decisions that affected us all.....it makes my flesh creep at the very thought.

Account suspended ● 6381d

"its like concorde its goes right over your heads..."Oh dear, oh dear - living in the past again. Has this Labour Leader never been told that Concorde stopped flying more or less at the same time as he crash landed?

Steve Taylor ● 6381d

If she ever gets to attend a meeting in the near future David then I will try and notice this hidden depth of hers!

Paul Fisher ● 6382d

Yes she has a very wicked sence of humour..its one where you will not evan realise she is taking the mick out of you..She does this so often in your meetings the officers are in stiches after the meetings because you lot tend to be so pompous and its like concorde its goes right over your heads...She gets on with Adrian Lee because of the same sence of humour or have you not worked that one out yet.

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

Does she ever smile!!

Paul Fisher ● 6382d

Yes fits of laughter at you lot...

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

I have come to the conclusion that Dave ought to be reported....................to his wife Cllr Mrs Hughes.. I think she'd have a fit!

Jim Lawes ● 6382d

Andrew You don't honestly believe Mr Hughes understood a word of your posting do you?

Steve Taylor ● 6382d

If I could make head or tail of it or perhaps if somebody could translate it then I might print it off David!!Are you still alledging that myself and my colleagues are being paid depending on how we vote?

Paul Fisher ● 6382d

Well you can all prove us wrong and vote against the tory party in the cuts..which would end up with Andrews positions being withdrawn and your Executive rolls going..but lets see now is position more inportant than morals or ethics..well we will all see how you sit on the fence and then roll over and vote for Tory Cuts you did the same last year..SHAME SHAME SHAME..Print that and keep it.

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

I have of course printed the allegations made by David Hughes for future reference.

Paul Fisher ● 6382d

Dave"In law, defamation (also called vilification, slander, and libel) is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism".Digest and take heed of the above before you make a prat of yourself

Account suspended ● 6382d

AndrewI would be interested, as I am sure others will, to see whether the local Labour Party itself takes the opportunity to disassociate itself from Dave's allegation, or whether it will give it its tacit approval by remaining silent.I suspect however that we already know the answer to that one.

Phil Andrews ● 6382d

I dont need a law book to know, that if you put an allegation in print that is patently and obviously untrue and without foundation is libelous. I would throw them books out Dave they are addling your brain.Are you suggesting that you are well informed and educated, and do not attack anyone who holds a different opinion to you Mr 'ewes? mmmmmmmmmm! I think not.

Account suspended ● 6382d

I note you have repeated the allegation that I am in receipt of money from the Conservative Party.  Please have any evidence of this which you may have in your possession ready for my solicitor.

Phil Andrews ● 6382d

I suggest you read some law books here I have 30 to 40 law books here in my house do you want to borrow them..or are you afraid they may be tainted with left wing views so far your attempts at debate have been ill informed un-educated and a bit dismal with your repeated attempts to confuse the issue and then attack anyone who has a diffrent view from yourself.

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

So you yet again fail to answer the question what you will vote on in the next round of cuts...mind you we all the know the answer, the Tory paymasters who you fawn over so much have you lot of gold diggers in the bag.

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

David"Hence you will be voting for cuts in education...will you be a brave voice and say no..I doubt it your vote has been purchased already".I cannot speak for Cllr.Andrews, but the above is a libelous statement, and in his shoes I would certainly take action against you! I am indeed surprised that the moderators of this forum have allowed it's pubication here!

Account suspended ● 6382d

Why does anyone even bother to respond to Mr Hughes? It only encourages him to post even more incomprehensible rubbish. Is it because everyone just wants to have a good laugh?

Steve Taylor ● 6382d

DaveIf you "stoped" the cuts in 2002, do I take it that the £1m funding which was earmarked for education but which you voted to siphon off to protect backroom Civic Centre jobs was returned to its rightful owners after the event?  If so when and how was this entered into the accounts, and when was it brought to the attention of Borough Council whose role it is to approve the council budget?Let give you a reminder of what happened.1. New Labour administration announces proposals to take £3m from the funding allocated by the government for education (which at the time was not ring-fenced, as most of it is today).  The proposal was to discontinue the borough's nursery nurse service.2. Huge public outcry, including thousands-strong march through Hounslow which I attended (as did you, the sheer gall of it!) and a demonstration outside the Civic Centre.3. Labour Group announces on budget night that it has "listened to the people" and announces triumphantly that it would now only steal £1m from the allocation for education (quite when and by what means the public had advised you of its desire for a £1m education cut was not explained).4. Independent Group proposes amendment to New Labour budget restoring the £1m to education at an additional cost of 29p per week to the Council Tax payer (proposed by Councillor John Murphy, seconded by Councillor Phil Andrews).  Amendment defeated.5. Revised New Labour budget including £1m shortfall in education funding approved by New Labour-dominated council.Dave, if you have serious concerns about the budget proposals being offered by the new administration then it is reasonable that you should express them here.What is not reasonable is for you and others to pretend that cuts, indeed more severe cuts than those being proposed now, were not made by your administration.  Not only is this completely dishonest, it is also quite cretinous as the true facts are freely available to anybody who can access the webcast of past Borough Council meetings at which New Labour budgets were set!Btw it is my policy not to rise to the bait offered by you and certain others with your tired references to the Community Group meekly allowing itself to be "dictated to" by our Conservative "masters" etc, etc (whilst at the same time being closet fascists with a cunning secret masterplan which is soon/one day to be revealed!).However in this instance I notice that you have referred to the Conservatives as being my "paymasters", suggesting that I am being offered money to vote in the way in which I do.Maybe you would like to avail yourself of this one and only opportunity which I am prepared to give you to expand upon this particular allegation?

Phil Andrews ● 6382d

Lets give you a clue in 2008 for the cuts in EDUCATION and what way you will be voting...yes its for cuts for your Tory paymasters...2002 if you remeber I stood up and stoped the cuts to Nursery Education something you failed to do...evan as you went round pretending you where going to do this your properganda machince was caught off guard as you carried on pretending you cared so much...you wnent into overdrive for cuts that did not take place..due to work of people like me to make the ruling group see reason the cuts did not happen..however it is costing us more than any other authority in the country because we where the first to provide this education to every child when the goverment made this an option for every council they gave them money to do so..however as Hounslow was already doing this we did not get any more money...So if you want to carry on a lie then at least reserch the real truth..I nearly lost the whip because this was an important issue not like the ICG who sit on the fence and band wagon an issue....

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

Hence you will be voting for cuts in education...will you be a brave voice and say no..I doubt it your vote has been purchased already.

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

Let me give you a clue David.  March 2002.

Phil Andrews ● 6382d

I am not proposing any cuts though I will of course be voting on them in due course but are you ignoring my question Dave?Were you one of those who voted to slice £1.000.000 which was once proposed to be £3,000,000 off the education budget when your group were in administration?Yes or No?

Paul Fisher ● 6382d

Are you the one thats proposing the cuts now...or are you the one thats trying to make up history..

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

Were you one of the Labour Group who voted to cut the education budget by £1,000,000 not so long ago Dave after origionaly proposing £3,000,000?

Paul Fisher ● 6382d

Yes thats right maybe if you use maths you can explain the cuts in education that mean people are unable to write in english whats happened to the budget..Do you agree...

Dave Hughes ● 6382d

Careful with your use of apostrophes, Jim! ;-)

James de Vivenot ● 6383d

It's more important that the new Administration gets it's arithmetic right!

Jim Lawes ● 6383d

Yes! Mr 'ewes has definitely lost it. "DYSLEXIA RULES KO"

Account suspended ● 6383d

"THIS magazine was suppose to be NON-POLITICAL and was up till the last election,"You really do post some twaddle Mr Hughes!! This magazine was so political during the last administration it even got delivered alongside Labour leaflets and that is a 100% fact.Alan Sheerins runs a mile when questioned about this scandal.

Paul Fisher ● 6383d

Its Tory trash that is political in nature and Hounslow Tax payers should not be paying for a rag that is political.Take the leaders rant on page 3, on crime, Hounslow is suppose to be crime ridden as the leader points out, but was he not the same idiot who when the rest of the area committes decided to buy mobile CCTV for the Police did he not with the rest of the Tories dedcided they would not put any money forward...HENCE no mobile CCTV in Chiswick hence more crime, What a plonker..better still is later in the magazine we are told the opposite...Teenage preganacy we are told it is rife GUESS which Tories decided that Sex Education was not needed and funding was cut evan when it was pointed out to them in a scrutiny report the need for such Education....DUH!!!!Its the same idiot who thinks that Gershun savings should not go back into providing better services but should be used as a tax cut..then goes and crys poverty to the goverment..if you can afford tax cuts you dont need more goverment money, the national Tax payer is not giving you money to give back as a Tax cut...another dumb move...HM Magazine was to be payed for by adverts name one non-internal advert in last 3 issues...there is no extrenal revnue paying for this magazine so we the TAX PAYER are now paying for the this rag fully.........If you cant get your grammer right what hope have we of you getting the budget right..THIS magazine was suppose to be NON-POLITICAL and was up till the last election, Now all we get is miss-informed un-educated dribble....

Dave Hughes ● 6383d

DAVID SAYS:""What does we spend our money on....."" "So says the headline in HM magazine in the budget statement for all of Housnlow to read"----------------------------------------------------------The chart illustration on page 06 of February's HM Magazine actually says:"""Where does we spend the money?"""It does seem a bit iffy..but David manages to mash it up even more..for Forum headline purposes.You will agree David that the HM Magazine is nowadays a much improved document. A quality newsletter I'd say.

Jim Lawes ● 6383d

Well it was not HM magazine!!!!!

Dave Hughes ● 6383d

Who typed that out for you as I could actually understand it for a change?

Paul Fisher ● 6383d

It is more likley you are jumping to his masters voice Paul. what new tricks has he taught you this week, you may need to learn to have your own view before attacking others for theirs.

Dave Hughes ● 6383d

David,have you permission to use your PC today as I was under the impression you had been instructed not to do by your Masters?

Paul Fisher ● 6383d

Ask HM magazine that....or better still learn grammer instead of getting down wid the kids init....

Dave Hughes ● 6383d

Dave,have you tried using spellcheck?

Keith Iddon ● 6383d