Forum Topic

HM magazines Leaders folly

Tax payers should not be paying for a rag that is political.Take the leaders rant on page 3, on crime, Hounslow is suppose to be crime ridden as the leader points out, but was he not the same idiot who when the rest of the area committes decided to buy mobile CCTV for the Police, did he not with the rest of the Tories in Chiswick dedcided they would not put any money forward...HENCE no mobile CCTV in Chiswick hence more crime, What a plonker..better still is later in the magazine we are told the opposite about crime.Teenage preganacy we are told it is rife GUESS which Tories decided that Sex Education was not needed and funding was cut evan when it was pointed out to them in a scrutiny report the need for such Education for our children....DUH!!!!Its the same idiot who thinks that Gershun savings should not go back into providing better services but should be used as a tax cut..then goes and crys poverty to the goverment..if you can afford tax cuts you dont need more goverment money, the National Tax payer is not giving you money to give back as a Tax cut...another dumb move...HM Magazine was to be payed for by adverts, name one non-internal advert in last 3 issues...there is no extrenal revnue paying for this magazine so we the TAX PAYER are now paying for the this poitcal rag fully.........Then we have the HM headline "How Does we spend your money"If you cant get your grammer right what hope have we of you getting the budget right..THIS magazine was suppose to be NON-POLITICAL and was up till the last election, Now all we get is miss-informed un-educated dribble....

Dave Hughes ● 6382d10 Comments