Forum Topic

Local Government Chronicle article upsets council staff

An article by Steve Fitzgerald Interim Director of finance at Hounslow, has managed to get up the noses of civic centre staff to whom the information contained within it came as something of a shock. Mr. Fitzgerald talks of a "large number of tiers of management". "What we are looking to do is to reduce it from 9 or 10 layers to as few as four or five". Those numbers are just fanciful. The article goes on 'But the main way that the council is seeking to deliver efficiencies is to remove 4,000 staff from the payroll'. Says Mr. Fitzgerald "There are people who don't want to be part of what's happening. We are giving people the opportunity to leave on fairly generous terms rather than becoming bogged down in Industrial Tribunals".People would dispute I am sure 9 or 10 layers of management which is just a product of his obviously very fertile imagination, or else he is just lying, and if 4,000 staff were to be "removed" from the payroll, there would be NO staff at all, the man is clearly delusional. You could be forgiven for thinking that the staff had been consulted at length about this "efficiency drive", they weren't they were told, and if the terms that are being offered are so "fairly generous" and of course legally O.K. why would you get "bogged down in Industrial Tribunals"?  The article further says that 'the main fruit of the efficiency drive so far has been to freeze council tax rates for two years', no, the aim was to freeze the council tax at all and any costs. Supposedly the Leadership O.K.d this drivel? Either way - this article which is full of wild assertions, not to say downright untruths, has done little to assuage the worries of the staff and promote any goodwill towards members, it is insulting, inaccurate and unacceptable. We can only hope someone has a word in Mr. Fitzgerald's shell like, and I know just the one.

Vanessa Smith ● 6345d45 Comments

Dear David, It is true that within the labour party there is a lot more sensitivity to mass sackings of public sector and other workers then there tends to be in conservative run administrations. One has to compare the three million plus unemployed under the tories to the much lower figure under the present government. On a local level it has always been a challenge to run statuary and other services as efficiently as possible so that these services that are required as a duty of law are not unaffordable. There is a degree of post code lottery to this however as for example for every pound funding Hounslow receives from Central Government, Chelsea gets £1.50 and Newham £2.00. This is why you will see many more tiers of staff in well funded inner London boroughs than you will ever get in places like Hounslow. Over the last decade or so there was hardly a year where it was not necessary to make a substantial cut in the council budget. This varied from the £5-8 million under the Thatcher cosh to £2-3 million of efficiency savings required of late under the Gershon framework. It is true that Labour administrations repeatedly tried to minimise the redundancies that these budget reductions caused. It has become increasingly difficult after nearly 2 decades of ever diminishing funding for local government to find ways to run services that the population and the law requires.That said, I cannot imagine how sacking 400 staff, many of which are quite senior managers and with years of accumulated knowledge and expertise will ever help performance improve. Sacking this amount of dedicated staff as some kind of magic option to improve performance does not make sense and I am sure people are more worldly than to think this could be the case. I would imagine residents will find it ever more difficult to access services as time goes on and the cuts impact on every aspect of service delivery. This is what residents will have to reflect on over the next few years.

Colin Ellar ● 6314d

Yup - completely out of touch. Nobody said life was fair.  Of course I don't approve of the way some private sector employers treat staff but its a dog eat dog world out here which you seem unable to comprehend. Of course I appreciate that public sector organisations provide services that affect peoples daily lives but that doesn't mean that those public sector organisations should have an open cheque book of taxpayers money. What you don't seen willing to accept is that there are millions of us in the private sector who provide services that affect peoples daily lives too but we don't all have the luxury of a safety net, final salary pension schemes, generous redundancy packages etc etc. We either have perform or we're out; and performing in the real world doesn't mean doing your 9 to 5 job to the best of your ability - it means giving that bit extra every day, it means watching your back, it means continual stress, it means outperforming your colleague, it means feeling guilty if you leave your 9 to 5 job before 7pm and your 'colleagues' are still slogging away. Of course the alleged cull at Hounslow is politically driven. Isn't that what politics is all about? The new administration promised us change for the better after 30 years of apathy and taking the softly, softy wet and weak approach. The new administration is demonstrating clear leadership qualities. People voted for change and change is what they will get. If services suffer the Administration will have to answer to the electorate and I am sure you and I will be amongst the first to point out the failings on forums such as this.  I feel desperately sorry for the Northern Rock staff who will lose their jobs as I feel sorry for the 3,000 Maersk staff who are losing theirs even though profits were up to over £900 Million. I sympathise even more with the Council staff who may lose theirs because the management tiers which are deemed to be totally unnecessary were a creation of the last administration. The new administration is simply trying to clean up the mess it inherited. The last administraion has a great deal to answer for doesn't it?     

Steve Taylor ● 6336d