Forum Topic

Phil. calling you a drug fascist is an accusation and I stated the grounds for making it. If you find it insulting that’s unfortunate.Referring to you as a scaremonger is an accusation its based on the rubbish  and miss represented facts printed on many of the anti drug leaflets and statements that are distributed by yourself and others, I have never heard you questions any of it.Asking how many people have been targeted by your group over cannabis use is a question and one you appear ether unwilling or unable to answer. Does the group have no policy on suspected drug use on the estate?Making accusations that councils up and down the country including our council (of which you are a senior member) target cannabis users with threats of eviction is a statement of fact. Asking if you are aware of the numbers or the policy is a question and again, one you seem unwilling or unable to answer. I note that you have not categorically denied that your community group or your council have ever threatened or targeted people in this manner does this mean that local estate wardens and council officials have no policy or procedure with regard to cannabis use in its housing.”Sorry, but I regard this as a cowardly way for a person to conduct himself and I am prepared to say so and accept the consequences”.As for how you speak to me (dismiss me)! As stated you do not respond to the postings of others (known alcohol users) with derogatory remarks over their drug of choice as a means of belittlement of their expressed views. This shows to me that you do have a problem with my cannabis use. I really could not care less as long as you answer the questions. Perhaps you should find out the answers.As for my attitude, three generations of my family have over the last 40 years been abused by the local authorities /law enforcement over this issue and people such as your self (councillors/politicians ) have, as our elected representatives done nothing to help or defend us/represent us, yet are perfectly happy to take our taxes to pay their wages. Perhaps when people such as yourself start to respect and represent people such as us and our families, I will start to respect people such as you.One last point,  I had a very poor education following in the footsteps of eight older brothers in the local schools I left earl and missed the last two years and am very grateful for spell and grammar checks on my computer , it however does not do Paragraphs.As a man whose parents where only semi literate I would like to say that dismissing peoples views  based on grammatical ability is a questionable attitude for a man in your position.

Philip Walsh ● 6218d

Andrew I think you will find I started a thread on the topic of these houses well over a year ago.I have also seen the destruction these people course. What you should remember is that these people are into much worse. They are willing to engage in all manner of criminal activity, if cucumbers became illegal these types would be into that as well. This situation only exist because of the high price of cannabis which in turn is only so high due to its  illegality and Jackie Smith is set to make these matters worse.License production or allow consumers to do small personal grows and this problem goes away.I like many in my industry do not like these gangs and do not do business with them. For my part I was visited by a man I believed may have been involved with one of these gangs he found me unhelpful and went elsewhere with his order, which would have been worth around £4000 to me.It is not just the destruction of property, which is a real problem or the theft of electricity that concerns me the most. Its the poor quality of what is very often dangerously contaminated product that people are consuming and what this means for the health of very many people, this an issue that is being over looked despite being a very real health risk.There is worse to come in the housing sector, Britain's first Meth-amphetamine lab was recently found. If the information contained in the issue of new scientist I was reading is anything to go by. The toxins from these labs can and do remain for many years. Police officers in the states wear bio-hazard suits when they shut them down and the houses become uninhabital. Some people are just Criminal and don't care, most cannabis users are just grown up people making grown up choices about how they live there lives. Phil,I thought it was cannabis that supposed to make one paranoid! Whats your excuse? I am simply asking questions of you as a councilor and community group leader (are you also head of housing). Do you know the answer to the questions or not. As for the term drug fascist, you may remember I used it before in response to the fact that you referred to my cannabis use as a way to put down the validity of my views in a way that you do not when responding to the alcohol users on the siteI know of at least one women who was threatened with eviction for allowing her son to smoke cannabis in her home. I am not going to put her name up here, she has now moved to a different part of London now her son has grown up and left home. Councils across the country carry out these actions and community groups are often the first to point the finger at those they don't like. I hardly think that asking someone in your position questions about this issue is an attack.

Philip Walsh ● 6219d

"Phil I am sure you do remember. It was to do with your drug fascist attitude and how many people have been targeted for their cannabis use by your group and how many family's or people have been threatened with losing their homes over the issue in your ward. Mine was the last posting on a thread, it was in response to things you had said, you would have had an e,mail about the posting. You never responded unless you consider going out on the streets of Isleworth within weeks as part of the local anti drugs / lies and scaremongering campaign currently being spearheaded by people such as yourself, the local police and daily scaremongers from The Telegraph and Daily mail."Wow, where do I begin with that lot?"your drug fascist attitude" - please explain."how many people have been targeted for their cannabis use by your group" - could you please give one example of somebody who has been 'targeted' by the Independent Community Group for using cannabis?  Frankly we have far more important things to concern ourselves with."or people have been threatened with losing their homes over the issue in your ward" - I really don't understand this comment at all but I can assure you that neither the ICG nor the local authority has any power to take away somebody's home for smoking a spliff.  Unless you are referring to council tenants who sublet their homes to people who use them as drugs factories in order to make huge sums of money from other people's misery.  The substances in such instances are rarely as benign as cannabis and I don't think most normal people would consider taking action against such tenants to be a particularly unreasonable act."going out on the streets of Isleworth within weeks as part of the local anti drugs / lies and scaremongering campaign currently being spearheaded by people such as yourself, the local police and daily scaremongers from The Telegraph and Daily mail" - the campaign which I assume you are referring to was to alert young people to the dangers of taking drugs, with particular emphasis on hard drugs.  Do you believe the local authority, the police and other agencies should be taking to the streets encouraging young people to take heroin and cocaine?Philip, my attitude towards cannabis is fairly liberal by many people's standards and I am surprised that you would consider me to be a drug fascist.  I have never myself indulged but that is a personal choice to which I presume you would agree I am entitled?There is a case for the decriminalisation of drugs as has been pointed out on here previously by Vanessa (cue another torrent of verbal abuse), and whilst I remain undecided on this matter I do believe it should be discussed out in the open rather than stifled by misinformation and scaremongering.I really am at a loss to understand what either I or the ICG have done to incur your wrath, but if you really do need somebody upon whom to vent your spleen about all the injustices in the world then I'm your man - I have strong shoulders and am pretty well fireproof, and if it spares some other poor sod the unpleasantness of being the target of your apparently random invective then at least some good will have come of it.

Phil Andrews ● 6220d

Andrew it comes as no surprise that you should disagree with me you always do, on any issue and as on all issues, you are in your own mind absolutely right and I feel there would be as much chance of you agreeing with anything I say as there would be of me voting for you as a politician. You seem to ignore the fact that your Vet's opinion was referring to pets in general not just dogs and as you said it's one vets opinion. I am a bit confused though over your response to Frazer did you agree with everything he said or just the not the dog bit Anthony not sure which bit you disagree with as a bacterial toxocologist consultant,I did not say that a dogs mouth was clean. As a bacterial toxocologist consultant, I am sure that you are aware that bite from a  disease free human is more likely to be come infected than a bite from a disease free dog.You state that Toxoplasmosis is on the increase but fail to mention whether that increase is due to the increasing population or what percentage of increase per head of population or over what time frame or how many cases. Anyway you can't catch it simply by being on a bus,I am sure that, as a bacterial toxocologist consultant you would know that, as this kind of info isn't new it been around for generations. Mankind's close association with canines is measured in many thousands of years. I am a little surprised that as a bacterial toxocologist consultant, you should just happen to be on this thread but even more surprised that as a bacterial toxocologist consultant, you don't know how to spell toxicologist. are you sure your names not A'phoney

Philip Walsh ● 6221d

Whist this may issue may be over the top it has a very small basis in reality, I am sure I am not the only person who has hard someone state ''I'm not eating that f*****g Pakki food'' and that can and often is transmitted to the children of such people. However the prospect that children should be monitored for 'incorrect thought's is worrying.The issue of dogs and Muslims continues to be blown out of perspective. I was refused the right to board a bus in Brentford a year or as back as the driver insisted that ''it was against the religion of others''. Needless to say I told him where to get off and refused to leave the bus, the situation only got resolved when a young Indian lady (presumably a Hindu) got up and let rip at the bus driver over the issue. She also had a dog and used buses; she had no more intension of listening to the drivers rubbish than I did.I have also had confrontations with some Muslim passengers.The problem comes from the fact dogs, like pigs are considered unclean and some people have taken this term far too literary. All it’s supposed to mean is that like pork you don't eat dog, both animals are scavengers, who will eat anything including animals that have died of disease or carcases that may be infested with worms or other parasites which may/can be passed to humans that subsequently eat the dog or pig.Personally I don't worship false idols or believe in mythical beings (gods) despite or more probably because of my Catholic upbringing and whilst I try to respect the beliefs of others I am fed up with the lack of respect the various religions have for my beliefs or right not to be manipulated by anyone else’s faith led intolerance or nonsense.

Philip Walsh ● 6226d