Forum Topic

ICG vindicated by cross-party support for enabling motion

Last night Hounslow Borough Council approved a motion proposed by the Leader of the London Borough of Hounslow, Councillor Peter Thompson, and seconded by the Community Group's Councillor Paul Fisher, supporting the Sustainable Communities Act and its intention to allow local authorities and their communities to drive assistance given by central government to reverse community decline and promote thriving, sustainable communities.The Act defines four aspects of sustainable communities thus:    * the improvement of the local economy,    * protection of the environment,    * promotion of social inclusion, and    * participation in civic and political activity.Significantly, the motion was supported without amendment by all the parties on the local authority. In other words, for all the political parties represented on the London Borough of Hounslow, participation in civic activity by all residents is now a recognised and desirable objective!The importance of this cannot be overstated. It effectively means that, even for those who have bitterly opposed the ICG since its inception in 1994, it is now acknowledged that we have been right all along. Our rationale as an organisation has been utterly and unanimously vindicated.Just last March a Community Group motion tabled a motion to Borough Council which included the following: "This council undertakes to extend its support and assistance to all independent community organisations which can reasonably demonstrate that they represent the aspirations of the community they serve, without seeking to influence or direct those organisations in any way other than with their consent."Furthermore this council accepts as a fundamental principle the equal right of all residents to participate in all fields of community and civic activity, and deplores any action which might give office or other advantage to any on grounds of political preference or affiliation."This council therefore instructs the Executive member responsible for improving community engagement following Annual Borough Council in May 2008 to investigate and thereafter to implement measures through which the consultative and participatory processes may be improved, and all officers to recognise and to actively assist in the delivery of this policy."Although passed by Council, New Labour at the time could not bring themselves to support these sentiments and the whole Group abstained.Obviously any policy statement is about the doing and not just the saying. However the fact that all parties felt able to offer even their in-principle support to such a radical departure from previous thinking could be a sign that the message is at long last getting through.As an active partner within the Council administration the ICG will ensure that the implications of this motion are realised to maximum effect.

Phil Andrews ● 6420d6 Comments

DaveI think that, in the manner of your kind, you wilfully confuse cause with effect.The ICG came into being nearly fifteen years ago because the then ruling Labour Group was carving up every area of civic activity in such a way as to ensure that its own members and supporters held every position of office it could, and by fair means or foul casting perfectly good people by the wayside in so doing because they were not under the discipline of the Party Machine.In other words Dave, we entered the political arena to right a wrong.  You have reversed this in your own mind to imply that we did so to fulfil "political ambitions" which neither you nor any of your colleagues have been able to convincingly define.  Let me state categorically here and now that I for one have no political ambitions whatsoever, and desire to take a back seat in politics as soon as the situation permits me to do so.Your Group's support for Councillor Thompson's motion, accepting it at face value, suggests a change of heart from those bad old days on the issue of civic participation.  The fact that the same Group felt unable to support our motion back in March suggests that this change of heart is recent.Can the non-political majority of residents who have been the victims of New Labour control-freakery in the past now expect an apology?  Or will you continue to pretend that this shameful state of affairs never happened and was instead a figment of the fevered imaginations of 1500 ICG members and several thousand voters?

Phil Andrews ● 6420d