Forum Topic

"With respect, I do not follow the first paragraph."With respect I don't follow why you don't follow my first paragraph! Conclusion = Termination; final result; inference; decision; (logic) proposition deduced;Conclude =  bring to an end; come to a conclusion"I have emailed Andy as I said I would.  You are mistaken."It is excellent that you have emailed Andy but one would have thought that as this is an 'open forum'  your remarks/comments could be transparent for all to see. Interested parties could then draw their own conclusions as to who is or isn't mistaken. "I would be interested to understand more about this.  Do you mean that it does not work technically or your complaints are not taken seriously?"I believe the complaints are taken seriously but there appears to be more of a tick box regime than a management system which effectively deals with the complaints. When I say the "system doesn't work" its because complaints get passed from pillar to post without active engagement. eg. a single complaint on a single subject generated no fewer than 5 different reference numbers and was 'looked at and responded to without effective result'  by  four different officers!"Please feel free to PM or email me and I will be happy to discuss and look into your concerns."Thank you - this is appreciated but I think transparency in dealing with matters such as Andrew's would go a long way to convince the whole community that Council Leaders are in touch with the reality of the situation.On a positive note I cite the positive and most helpful contributions and comments made on this forum by Cllrs Matt Harmer and Jon Hardy and the helpful and proactive information as always supplied by Officer Chris Calvi- Freeman. These are much appreciated

Steve Taylor ● 6309d

I tend to find most authorities these days have introduced call centres.  Of course the authorities will say that they are committed to their customers and the introduction of the call centre is a positive step for all, but in reality all the call centre does is assist the Council in achieving high performance target indicators relating to how soon the call is answered.The fact is that in most cases the person within the call centre won't be able to assist you, and you will then end up being put on hold for several minutes, put through to completely the wrong department or not be given good quality advice - but of course that isn't measured by any performance indicator so it doesn't matter.I'm not identidying Hounslow as being one of the culprits here, but I could easily name several London authorities that operate as follows :1) There's a general call centre followed by a departmental call centre, with the departmental one responsible for logging calls and trying to put you through to the right person (by which time usually at least 3 minutes has elapsed).2) There is no onus on the Officer to accept a call from the departmental call centre, and the system operates whereby the Officer is supposed to ring you back within 2 working days of your call (usually at least 5 minutes has elapsed at this point).3) Most of the time the Officers don't ring you back within 2 working days.  Officers are also under strict instructions not to, under any circumstances, give out their direct lines to a member of the public - I mean that would make things far too easy wouldn't it ?.It is an absolute farce that the same places then 'boast' about how 97% of calls are answered within 4 rings.  I can only smile when I ring the particular Council I am thinking of and the departmental call centre message brags about how the opening hours of the call centre have been extended as though that is of use - the call centre could be open 24/7 but if the Officer I want to speak with isn't there or can't be arsed to take a call, and I don't have and can't be provided with a direct line, then the call centre is entirely pointless.And this from someone who tries to be reasonable and often defends Councils from criticism !.

Adam Beamish ● 6314d