Forum Topic

Brentford has Britain's most costly MP

According to the Daily Mail:"Health Minister Ann Keen has been confirmed as Britain's most costly MP. Her expenses claim totalled a whopping £167,306 in the last financial year - the highest excluding transport costs, which disproportionately affect some English and Welsh and all Scottish MPs. "Her husband Alan, who represents a neighbouring seat, claimed a total of £146,408, bringing the couple's overall cost to the taxpayer to £313,714 in the last financial year - excluding travel costs. "The couple, nicknamed 'Mr and Mrs Expenses', claimed the extraordinary costs despite living just a 30-minute drive from Westminster."The claims came on top of their annual salary, which was worth £61,820 to each at the time, and a gold-plated final salary pension scheme. "The MPs represent adjoining constituencies in West London, nine miles from the House of Commons, and live in their constituency home in Brentford. "In all, the Keens, who are officially 'outer London MPs', received a total of £38,193 in second-home allowance alone, to cover the cost of running the cost of an apartment on the South Bank, a short walk from the House of Commons. "The property's value has risen from an estimated £500,000 in 2002 to around £750,000 today - meaning the pair are estimated to have built up a £250,000 property nestegg courtesy of the taxpayer."There is no suggestion that Mrs Keen, 60, and her 71-year-old husband broke the rules. However, critics claim they live so near to the Commons that they should be able to claim only the inner London supplement of £2,700. Last year it emerged that Mrs Keen had insured her husband's life for £430,000 and put the premium on expenses. That is despite the fact that both members are covered thanks to their parliamentary pensions. "Mrs Keen also became the first MP to face action for breaching the 'duty of care' to a constituent. She was ordered to pay £15,000 in damages to 84-year- old war veteran John Taylor for failing to represent him in his battle to clear his name after a miscarriage of justice, although the case has yet to be resolved. "The other expenses she claimed include £104,508 in office costs, £10,000 in communication costs, £19,142 in staff cover and other costs and £5,497 in stationery. In addition to his second-home claim of £19,855, Mr Keen's overall bill also included £13,449 in office running costs, £97,101 in staffing costs and £9,786 in communication costs and £3,549 in stationery costs."A spokesman for Mrs Keen refused to comment on her expenses. "

David Giles ● 6267d33 Comments

I too would like to see Andrew Dakers as our MP but I have concerns about the stance of some of the party seniors over the expenses debacle because they still just don't get it. Here's what I wrote to Nick Clegg:"I was really looking forward to the real opportunity of the Libs ousting my current New Labour MP.However, after watching Chris Huhne participate in the C4 news  debate on Thursday I am outraged at how totally out of touch he is with the reality of life. For Mr Huhne to  "really resent" and "entirely reject"  fair and real comment by an audience participator is beyond belief.  HOW DARE HE!!!  And to state his claim for a trouser press is/was  in line with normal business practice and try to justify his greed by claiming to have only claimed 17% of what he is 'entitled to'  is indeed beneath contempt. I happen to manage a sales force who also 'have to look good' when seeing clients but would I allow them to pay for a trouser press on Company expenses, or would I indeed claim for one so that I can 'look good' in front of my sales force? I think not. In the 'real world'  P45's would be in abundance for this type of behaviour.  It is indeed a sad day for the Lib Dems when Vince Cable has tried so hard to lead the party (yes I know he isn't the real leader but he makes more appearances and speaks out more often than the elected leader) and people like Chris Huhne are let loose in a C4 studio to display extreme arrogance and contempt for the British public and then pout like spoilt schoolboys when they are reprimanded for their wrongdoing and greed. Mr Huhne's body language, anger, disbelief and plain arrogance were clear evidence that he has absolutely no idea of what the expenses issue is all about. I 'entirely reject'  his apology for claiming and I 'really resent'  that he claimed it in the first place. I urge Mr Clegg to show some leadership and encourage  Mr Huhne to beg C4 for some more airtime to apologise unreservedly for his display of uncalled for arrogance and contempt for the public."

Steve Taylor ● 6216d

"Competitive bumping however is a little silly"I can't see how you can say anything is competitive about bringing the constant discussions about MPs to the top of the page to see what has been said about the issue over many years.  What is really silly is how we all look on the world stage; how we encourage people to vote and how we get the right people to have the want to go into Parliament having tasted the outside world and then peeked into this strange one though the TV cameras.This situation is a complete disgrace and to hear what is being said by some MPs to justify their claims is incredible.  One poor chap (!) appeared so incensed about people picking over his expenses that he demanded on a news programme that they consider taking the biscuits out of the green room.The rules now being 'blamed' let the MPs down.  When they entered Parliament they appear to have settled in to claiming what they could and not what they should in the spirit of guarding the public purse and doing the very privileged job they were elected to do.  Any MP who proudly states they didn’t make outrageous claims cannot hide because they must have known it was going on and now the situation reflects badly on them too.  'Change' must be the most over used and yet meaningless political spin word in history – you have to work out what is going on, in order to work out what 'change' should be.  The real change in this system starts with enabling people to ask the right questions to challenge what is going wrong.  I feel really sorry for the poor sod who apparently tried to tell the Speaker that things weren't quite right.It would be a distraction to send the Police after whoever leaked this information - if their name is announced they will probably receive a few million nominations for a medal or two.  Of course the Police should be involved if payments have been made on claims which clearly are not reasonable for running a second home to be near to parliament resulting in a loss to the public purse just as anyone would expect of a common benefit thief.I am pretty angry as I regard the right to vote very important, driven home recently by researching the 1911 census where thousands of women refused to take part in the census in protest at not being allowed to vote.  My sons are at work where this is on the radio and the canteen is full of discussion about flipping houses and evading this or that tax - all spoken about in terms of a huge fraud -  and they wonder about taking and using their vote.Now the 'secret is out' it is not being handled very well either - listen to Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe  http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8047000/8047366.stm

Sarah Felstead ● 6224d

"I always had the tenet that as an elected person you should never claim for anything that would embarass you if made public"DanThis seems an eminently sensible rule to follow.  As it happens the matter of the Keens' second home surfaced shortly before the 2005 General Election and as a consequence the pair of them effectively spent the entire campaign in hiding, avoiding hustings meetings and any other scenario in which they might have encountered awkward questions for members of the public.  I'm not sure whether they were embarrassed - they seem incapable of embarrassment and appear of the view that anything they can grab from the trough is their birthright as a consequence of their innate greatness - but they certainly weren't in the mood to discuss it.In the event it worked on that occasion, and they and their supporters had a good smirk about it at the election count at the expense of their gullible voters.  However, the fact that the Keens themselves were unprepared to publicly defend their actions probably explains why not too many of their supporters seem willing to do so on their behalf, and under the circumstances one could hardly blame them.They do however have a little team of letter-writers, or rather people who are prepared to put their names to pre-written letters (they have been caught out on this on at least one occasion), that get sent to the letters' pages of the local press telling us all how lucky we local people are to have the Keens as our MPs.  Two of them actually live outside the borough and are therefore able to pontificate to us in the knowledge that they can safely withdraw at any time of their choosing because nobody really knows them anyway.That's my take on the matter.  I'm not sure whether I'm one of the people you have down as a political opponent of the Keens, but in reality I and my Group have no selfish interest in this general election as we are not participating in it.  Ordinarily we wouldn't take a position, but as the Keens have chosen to make us their enemy we find ourselves involved whether we like it or not.

Phil Andrews ● 6224d