Hi Luke,As you suggested, I'm posting a few further queries on this...>I have the pleasure of project managing the changes to >Carville Hall Park South. I work for West Play a local >charitable organisation that has been commissioned by BWL >to spend their £365,000 S106 obligation to the park.I have to say I'm concerned that this is spending money for the sake of spending money...>When/if we get permission from the council we will be>shuting the park for a short period of time to make the>improvments.Who (or what office) in the council is responsible for making this decision? And how long is "a short period of time"?>The main part of the plans are to improve the play offer>in the park. The current tired play area will be replaced >with a design led ball games area and further play >features will be located in the park including what we >think is a very exciting water and sand play area.The current playground is scruffy, but quite functional and popular. Why can't it just be tidied up?Also, the current playground is aimed at 7-14 year-olds. A ball-games area will attract an older crowd - is this wise, and what has been the response of park residents to this possibility?>The pond will be cleared and generaly tidied up.So definitely not filled in? And how come this work has already started (draining the pond) when you imply that your plan doesn't yet have permission from the council? Is Scotscape working for you, for BWL, or for the council?>We will also be improving the paths and yes we will be >clearing some of the trees. However most of these will be >the overgrown evergreens that are causing a problem to the >more muture deciduous trees that we want to keep and some>of the seed fall growth that hasn't been managed in the >past. Are any of the deciduous trees due for the chop under your plans? Where and why? >All our planned works have been informed by ecolgical >reports on the current state of the trees and wildlife.Where can park users see copies of your plans and of the ecological reports?>The plans were drawn up and discussed in consoltation with >local users of the Park (me being one of them) An advisory >group was set up that included members of the Haverfield >Residents Association, Towers Residents Association, >Brentford Toy Library and Residents of the Park. Other >local residents also got involved.When was this advisory group formed, and how can interested parties join it?>We also spent the day in the park to pick up the views of >any regular users we might have missed.It's curious that I've not yet managed to find another regular user who'll admit to having been consulted. I will keep asking around though!>The park will continue to be screened from the M4/A4 by >it's trees. That's good to know.
Bryan Betts ● 6246d