So once one is elected one no longer has to account for oneself? Is that your argument. I can see a flaw.I, for one, do not like being called a liar* by someone with a past track record both self-confessed and court-established as a nazi thug, and who lashes out against anyone who does not buy his new reformed persona. In addition to this, he has accused me on 15 June of making anonymous posts (at a time when I was actually busy at work) on his blog when, so far as I know, the only posting I ever made there was on 2 June when at that time, mistakenly I now think, I was inclined to believe his claims.So, to save me the bother of digging out his election addrsses, which I'll bet don't answer my question, perhaps you can tell me what he has lived on fo the last 20 years apart from councillor allowances? Air? Has he ever done a day's paid work in the real world in his life?*pompous, pontificating etc., are matters of opinion and/or judgment, but liar is a slur and requires evidence. The only issue, so far as I am aware, of which I can be found to have been in error was a reference to a meeting he had around a tsble with his BNP friend Nick Griffin and the sometime NF leader Andrew Brons. I had presumed from the context where I read this that this occurred after 1991. As soon as Phil Andrews challenged me on that I asked when the meeting was, and got no reply but instead a challenge of a distinctly pompous nature to withdraw or face the consequences, for consequences there will be! I told him to grow up. He later lashes into me again with a string of invective. The one thing he cannot stomach is the possibility of anyone observing that his activities have all the hallmarks of entryism, by which community or other groups are "taken over" by someone or a group of people who progressively all the machinery.
Dan Filson ● 6161d