Forum Topic

Phil, beyond the traditional duelling between yourself and Vanessa you will know there is real substance behind what she is saying.You will be looking at the predictable betrayal of Peter Hills and Linda Nakamura and will know that is what could well be in store for the ICG.You will know, I am sure, that senior management have been instructed that they serve the leader of the council, meaning the Tories, and are to give you the bare basics of a service between now and the 2010 elections, where it seems to be being presumed there will be an overall Conservative majority.The Conservatives, and their senior officers, are preparing for an administration which doesn't include you.I know you know all this, and I'm guessing you are keeping your powder dry and evaluating all your options.  I know you will not be happy by the Tories refusal to support you on Mogden, and that you need to deliver for your residents.  You will be considering your response, and I'm guessing you'll be looking to next year's budget.In Hounslow we have an odd situation in which the main opposition actually feels threatened by the prospect of a rupture within the administration.  It is a situation like no other I have experienced in all my years of local government.I know you well enough to know you will probably have a response to the circumstances in which you find yourself.  But, in poking fun at Vanessa you know full well that you are only stoning the messenger, and for you to pretend otherwise is to be deplored.

Andrew Penty ● 6184d

This thread is quite interesting to an outside observer. I did not realise until now that the Conservatives could not achieve a majority simply with the ICG (which I naively thought was the Isleworth Community Group but now learn is the Independent Community Group). They have to rely on garnering other votes from somewhere, and I read it is the West Area Independents they turn to. The position is possibly further confused by certain councillors switching from one group to another (resulting in a father and son now in different groups!)Councillot Andrews writes of Labour "going into opposition without a fight in Hounslow following the local elections of 2006". Usually if you lose local elections, that's what you do, Phil (though no doubt if the BNP won an election, they would declare a thousand year reich). If Labour had fewer councillors than the Conservatives - which I understand is the case - it would have been even harder to form a workable alliance than for the Conservatives, especially any alliance however loose involving a group headed by a former member of 15 years standing of the National Front with a self-confessed record of using violence other than in self-defence.The real problem that this unholy mess creates is that come the 2010 elections, you can be quite sure that no group that has supported the coalition in charge, whether as a formal member of the administration (even if they have now slipped out of it) or as an allegedly issue-by-issue supporter, will accept responsibility for anything that has not gone too wonderfully. One of the besetting problems with politics today is that political parties are hard to pin down to accept responsibility. Hopefully, the position after 2010 will be clearer both locally and nationally. Much as people may dislike the concept of whips, it is important for the public to know which party stands for what, and on the big issues it is right that a party line is established so that, after the event, the public can know which party stood where on an issue.

Dan Filson ● 6186d