Forum Topic

Steve,I don't know the details but my contacts inform me that she has been trying to put pressure on Thames Water for a long time. In fact, it will be a perennial problem for any MP for the area.As you know, she brought the environment minister to see the plant and to meet with yourself and Simon Eaton-Walker a few years ago. You may only have been living in the area for around ten years but the Labour Party has been fighting on the issue for literally decades.In your criticisms of Ann Keen, you have failed to explain why you believe that either of the alternatives will be more successful on this issue.You have already indicated that you intend voting for Andrew Dakers. That's your right. But an acquaintance of mine who lives within sniffing distance of Mogden is perplexed by his stance on the issue. Is it really true that as a member of the SDC he voted FOR expansion (and yet, shortly afterwards, voted on the Isleworth & Brentford Area Committee in favour of a motion "regretting" the SDC's decision to approve the expension?).Regarding the Tories, how do you feel about the fact that Thames Water donated £50,000 to them just before the 1992 General Election? (I'm not sure whether any more recent donations have been made but am investigating this). If Mary Mac£eod's party continue to receive financial backing from the owners of the Mogden plant, it's not likely to give her a lot of incentive to make Thames Water take heed of residents' wishes.After all, what's the old saying ...?"He who pays the piper calls the tune."

Robin Taylor ● 6179d

From today's Hounslow Guardian (by Paul Teed):Alan Keen MP claimed £580 on expenses for two sat-nav systems, we can reveal.The Feltham and Heston MP, whose Brentford home is less than 10 miles from Westminster, charged taxpayers £399 and £179 for the Tom Toms, in the space of six months, signing to say the bill was “incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily” in the performance of his duties.But Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said the gadgets were not essential for Mr Keen to do his job and were a waste of public money.He said: “An MP who lives only a few miles from Parliament has no possible need for a sat-nav, and even if he lived in the middle of nowhere it should be down to him to find his way around.”But Mr Keen said: “I have one member of staff who works in the constituency almost all of the time, meeting with, arranging and organising meetings with constituents and dealing with casework from the Feltham office. The sat-navs are so helpful for finding addresses when we make home visits.”As MPs’ expenses were officially published for the first time last week, they also showed that Mr Keen made regular monthly claims of £250 for his office at home, but crucial details of what he spent it on were not revealed.Mr Keen said the money covered “a variety of costs agreed with the Fees Office”.He said: “In normal circumstances, I used to spend a great deal of my time on Fridays, weekends and Mondays working from home where I have a permanent office.“For the last 15 months or so I have rented office space in Feltham.”His other submitted reciepts included shopping lists with items such as 55p for ring doughnuts, £1.19 for crisps, and a £2.05 fajita at the Houses of Parliament.He and his wife Ann Keen, MP for Brentford and Isleworth, also regularly put in claims for their £55 weekly cleaning and ironing bill.Mr Elliott added: “Many of these claims are clearly not essential to doing the job of being an MP and frankly stink of taking advantage of taxpayers’ money.“This couple have lost touch with the real world on a huge scale.” (endit)

Stuart Parrott ● 6181d