"Is it really? As someone who has chosen to ally herself on this thread with a right wing Tory like Jim Lawes, it's amusing to hear you use a term like that."Only in your world Robin does not verbally attacking someone mean that you're 'allying' yourself with them. I don't know Jim from Adam, which I quite clearly said in a previous post, the only thing I said about him that may be deemed as 'allying' was that I admired his photographs, and I do, they're very nice. (But watch out, that now makes us photography allies apparently and we shall take over the world one summer fete snapshot at a time). Again (quite predictably) it just comes down to politics with you though doesn't it? How dare someone like 'tory' photos, I must disinfect my eyeballs after looking at them so the 'toryness' doesn't rub off on me. Get a grip.Funny you'd find my choice of words amusing, I find it amusing for someone that flaunts their class discrimination so flagrantly and openly to call somebody else 'right wing.'"Isn't it? Well, the last ones he took led to the house being occupied," I know this is something you're clinging to dearly but I'm afraid I'm going to have to burst your bubble.. No they didn't. Nobody from Brook Road South had even seen those pictures until they were included in an article (the Guardian I believe) about the house being squatted. It was local knowledge before those pictures were taken and passed around and those 'middle class layabouts' are local people (from Chiswick, Brentford and Hanworth)."They unfurled a banner that contained the lie that the Keens had bought the house out of people's taxes."Again, no they didn't. Not one of the banners said 'this house was bought with tax money', I can only presume you're talking about the 'reclaiming your taxes' banner? The second home was paid for with taxes, thus enabling them to pay for the building work and the interest payments on their mortgage on their first home in Brentford. Even if that wasn't the case the 'reclaiming your taxes' banner wasn't necessarily referring to the house specifically, however much you seem to like to think it was."That's just plain patronising." Was it? I do apologise, it wasn't meant to be."There is nothing wrong with my sense of 'inner wellbeing'. But there probably would be if I spent my spare time going round to the property of the Tory candidate, harrassing her and posting photos of her house on local forums."As apposed to spending your spare time on a forum board of a place I presume you've never lived in and probably spend about as much time in as the Keens, just to defend them to the death when any of their constituents dare to complain about their MPs? It wouldn't stand out so much but you're so so venomous with no provocation at all, it's actually quite unsettling."I get the impression from your postings that you sympathise with the eco villagers and former squatters (indeed, Jim seems to think you are one of them). It frankly beggars belief that these oh so "cool dudes" can side with Tory activists against two Labour MPs"Sympathise? That's a strange word to use in that context, what they're doing at eco village is brilliant, the local support is overwhelming and it's a really positive progressing project involving really warm welcoming and friendly people.. What on earth makes you think they need 'sympathising' with?It all comes back to this 'siding with' thing again doesn't it? You're really quite focused on that aren't you? Would it ruin the illusion that we're bestest chums if I told you I think both your stupid pointless political parties are just two sides of the same greedy, corrupt, deceitful, coin? This is why I don't vote or get involved in politics, because all the options are just as bad as each other. That said Robin, just because two independant people don't like you, doesn't mean they're 'allies'.Anything else or are we done?ps. 'Cool dudes'...? Really Robin...? I prefer the term 'swingin hip-cat', or if we have to stick to surfer-isms then 'bodacious babe' will do just fine.
Stephanie Kitsune ● 6103d