Forum Topics

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

Some readers may have read the very sad and alarming news that the bowling green at Gunnersbury Park is to be "repurposed" as a putting green (also known as a crazy golf course).Much has changed since the incorporation of the Community Interest Company (CIC) in 2015. In that year, as part of a leisure strategy for the Park, it was stated that "the location of the bowls club and its green is seen as a positive to the scheme in terms of development of the club, membership and participation. For example use of the sports hall for indoor short matt bowls and general increase in footfall to the site. The councils have met with the bowls club committee and will continue to work together in developing these proposals."There is no question that the CIC faces formidable financial challenges, greatly exacerbated by the Covid crisis and by the fire at the cafe. However other significant problems, including the one year delay in the completion of the Sports Hub, appear to be due to poor project management rather than to bad luck.The CIC is a not-for-profit community interest company set up to manage Gunnersbury Park and Museum. The CIC is managed by a board of 6 people, supported by an executive arm comprising the CEO and other salaried staff. Amongst other things a CIC is statutorily responsible for ensuring that the company is run in a way that satisfies the community interest test. In practice, this means that it may be required to give more weight to the interests of the community than to financial returns although, like any other company, it is required to remain solvent. A matter of very significant public concern is the "democratic deficit" which characterises the CIC's activities. This is manifested in a lack of transparency, accountabilty, and reluctance to engage with the community. For example, the CIC publishes no lists of meeting dates, agendas, minutes, or agreed action points.This latest announcement by the CIC presages the wanton destruction of a precious community facility which was founded in 1931 and which could still be reinstated. It is clear that the CIC is bent on the cynical engineering of a situation whereby they hope that a planning permission for a cafe/restaurant at the bowling club pavilion will be be granted in due course.Descriptions of events over recent years have been characterised by misunderstandings, blatant misinformation and, like any other sports club, some internal dissension. At the end of its life the Bowling Club had 25 members, of which 22 were active. The Club was fully aware of the need to grow its membership, of all ages. To this end, the CIC were approached and a strategy was presented to them. A 2-year plan, allowing for completion of the new Sports Hub building, then 1 year exposure to all the visitors to the Hub, and then 1 year of open days and free training and associated publicity. It was felt that as a result the membership could easily be raised to 60 or more particularly as there were positive signs of a revival in the sport.The CIC rejected the plan out of hand.The club was given notice to quit the site by 9 January 2020. The CIC had reneged on an agreed extension of the Licence to Occupy and thereby forced the departure of the bowls club. All of those involved in the CIC's decision should hang their heads in shame. Brentford Voice wishes to do all in its very limited power to rescue the situation. To that end we would welcome any comments, suggestions, and expressions of support.Please post your replies on this Forum or send an email to info@brentfordvoice.co.uk

Jim Storrar ● 1834d12 Comments ● 1830d

Building over dropped kerb at end of York Rd :-(

Hi Brentfordians -Last week the new Shepherd's Bush Housing / Bugler development of flats at the end of York Rd (what used to be the New Inn pub) built over what was a dropped kerb - which formed part of the turning circle at the end of the street.This is very annoying and means we can't turn cars around easily / safely any more in what is a fairly long / narrow + increasingly congested cul-de-sac.  It won't just affect residents - but also visitors (deliveries, post, milk, bins etc) and emergency services wanting to get in + out of the street.I tried to see if this was within Shepherd's Bush Housing Planning Application / Consent (Planning Ref. 01244/AB/P10)- and from all that I can read online in the Hounslow planning files, it doesn't seem to be.  The Planning drawings all show the dropped kerb intact and not modified, and as far as I can recall/tell there was no neighbour consultation on this change from Planning drawing details.So I am wondering if this might be an 'illegal' development / infringement, and if there might be any grounds / avenue to have it restored..I've tried tweeting Hounslow / Shepherd's Bush / Bugler for a response - but nothing.  Have just logged a 'Planning infringement' thing with Hounslow in the hope they are obliged to formally respond.If anyone's got any better advice on how to check the official status / legality of this, or even speak directly to planning folks, I'd be interested to hear.Many thanks, Tony (York Rd)

Tony Griffiths ● 3030d15 Comments ● 1839d

Information

Requesting Hounslow Councillor's case figures for municipal year of 2019/2020.  Please detail by ward and councillors. The information listed below shows casework numbers as recorded on our systems.  Councillors receive and act on many other issues which aren't recorded on our own systems either because they take them up direct with officers by phone, email, and in meetings, or help the resident/business solve them without the need for additional council intervention, or because they are outside council responsibilities.  Those outside council responsibilities might be issues raised with police, TfL, business owners or be about, for example, parks not owned/managed by the council.  In addition, responding to queries about planning applications is not recorded as casework.   CouncillorVolumesWardCouncillor Aqsa Ahmed34Feltham NorthCouncillor Javed Akhunzada63BedfontCouncillor Candice Atterton15HanworthCouncillor Harleen Atwal Hear48Heston CentralCouncillor Patrick Barr63Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Lily Bath70Heston WestCouncillor Joanna Biddolph249Turnham GreenCouncillor Tom Bruce301Hounslow SouthCouncillor Samia Chaudhary80HanworthCouncillor Komal Chaudri58Feltham NorthCouncillor Unsa Chaudri64Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Bandna Chopra65Hounslow WestCouncillor Mel Collins119BrentfordCouncillor Steve Curran636SyonCouncilor Theo Dennison13SyonCouncillor Michael Denniss6Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Sukhbir Singh Dhaliwal42CranfordCouncillor Poonam Dhillon1CranfordCouncillor Katherine Dunne60SyonCouncillor Richard Eason174Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Richard Foote41HanworthCouncillor Adriana Gheorghe225BedfontCouncillor Gabriella Giles28Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Ranjit Gill158Turnham GreenCouncillor Ajmer Grewal90Hounslow CentralCouncillor Pritam Grewal163Hounslow CentralCouncillor Puneet Grewal10Hanworth ParkCouncillor Shivraj Grewal53Heston CentralCouncillor Vickram Grewal78Hounslow HeathCouncillor Bishnu Bahadur Gurung90Hanworth ParkCouncillor Sam Hearn157Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Kamaljit Kaur0Heston EastCouncillor Hanif Khan75Hanworth ParkCouncillor Hina Kiani1Hounslow HeathCouncillor Afzaal Kiani28Hounslow HeathCouncillor Gurmail Lal43Heston EastCouncillor Guy Lambert338BrentfordCouncillor Tony Louki685Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Khulique Malik135CranfordCouncillor Nisar Malik13Hounslow CentralCouncillor Amritpal Mann33Heston EastCouncillor Gerald McGregor48Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Shaida Mehrban66Hounslow SouthCouncillor Hina Mir8Feltham WestCouncillor Alan Mitchell61Feltham WestCouncillor Ron Mushiso86Turnham GreenCouncillor Surinder Purewal40Heston CentralCouncllor Shantanu Rajawat49Heston WestCouncillor Daanish Saeed47IsleworthCouncillor Sue Sampson80IsleworthCouncillor Balraj Sarai*0Heston WestCouncillor Salman Shaheen105IsleworthCouncillor Jagdish Sharma2Hounslow WestCouncillor Raghwinder Siddhu191BedfontCouncillor Corinna Smart29BrentfordCouncillor Karen Smith795Hounslow SouthCouncillor Sohan Sumra28Hounslow WestCouncillor Kuldeep Tak*16Feltham NorthCouncillor John Todd399Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Mohammed Umair30Feltham West

Vanessa Smith ● 1841d2 Comments ● 1841d

The truth re Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

It is important for people to know the truth, not CIC propaganda, so here is a rebuttal of some points in Cllr Lambert's statement re the club:'the bowls club has been wound up by the members/committee' - trying to make it sound as if it was our decision; in fact it was forced upon us by the CIC who ordered us to be out by Jan 2020'it had 22 members of whom 12 were active' - there was in fact a petition signed by 21 playing members who wanted the club to be allowed to continue'They maintained the green themselves with some help from Capel Manor' - the vast majority of the work was carried out by the members; there was occasionally some help from Capel Manor students who in exchange benefited from learning greenkeeping skills'the lease called for them to maintain the clubhouse, however the CIC stepped in to do so at times at a cost of around £2 per annum' - three longstanding members say they have no idea where this claim came from; there was no regular contribution from the CIC; in fact no one can remember any contribution except something to do with some fire alarm/equipment'they believed membership would grow after the delayed sports hub was completed but the development is many months late' - CIC should have kept a proper check on working practices and the (lack of) progress. The delays were not our fault, so couldn't the CIC have waited a few months longer to give us a chance to grow the membership?'Most of the bowlers have moved on to other clubs or retired' - not because we wanted to, but forced to retire in the case of those of us without cars who want to respect the instruction not to travel on public transport unnecessarily'It's not clear there would be anyone to fix the green' - a number of volunteers have offered to do so. Before the club was kicked out Capel Manor offered to take over the green maintenance provided the club was allowed to remain there. The CIC wouldn't even consider it.'The CIC is supposed to grow the use of the park' - how does killing off one of its longest-established activities contribute to that? Why could no other place in the park be considered for the pitch and putt so both activities could have co-existed?'pitch and putt mooted to attract 3000 players per year' - apart from the wildly optimistic numbers, if golf is so important to the park, why was the previous pitch and putt eliminated rather than relocated?

Bela Cunha ● 1849d24 Comments ● 1842d

Network Management Duty Guidance

Network management duty guidanceThis guidance is additional statutory guidance issued by the Secretary of State for Transport under Section 18 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 (“the act”).It applies to all highway authorities in England, who shall have regard to this guidance to deliver their network management duty under the act. It is effective from the date of publication.It does not replace the original Network Management Duty Guidance published in November 2004, but provides additional advice on techniques for managing roads to deal with COVID-19 response related issues. It will be reviewed 3 months after publication.The guidance sets out high-level principles to help local authorities to manage their roads and what actions they should take. Updates to this document or further guidance on related subjects may be published as the need is identified.Reallocating road space: measuresLocal authorities in areas with high levels of public transport use should take measures to reallocate road space to people walking and cycling, both to encourage active travel and to enable social distancing during restart (social distancing in this context primarily refers to the need for people to stay 2 metres apart where possible when outdoors). Local authorities where public transport use is low should be considering all possible measures.Measures should be taken as swiftly as possible, and in any event within weeks, given the urgent need to change travel habits before the restart takes full effect.None of these measures are new – they are interventions that are a standard part of the traffic management toolkit, but a step-change in their roll-out is needed to ensure a green restart. They include:Installing ‘pop-up’ cycle facilities with a minimum level of physical separation from volume traffic; for example, mandatory cycle lanes, using light segregation features such as flexible plastic wands; or quickly converting traffic lanes into temporary cycle lanes (suspending parking bays where necessary); widening existing cycle lanes to enable cyclists to maintain distancing. Facilities should be segregated as far as possible, i.e. with physical measures separating cyclists and other traffic. Lanes indicated by road markings only are very unlikely to be sufficient to deliver the level of change needed, especially in the longer term.Using cones and barriers: to widen footways along lengths of road, particularly outside shops and transport hubs; to provide more space at bus stops to allow people to queue and socially distance; to widen pedestrian refuges and crossings (both formal and informal) to enable people to cross roads safely and at a distance.Encouraging walking and cycling to school, for example through the introduction of more ‘school streets’. Pioneered in London, these are areas around schools where motor traffic is restricted at pick-up and drop-off times, during term-time. They can be effective in encouraging more walking and cycling, particularly where good facilities exist on routes to the school and where the parents, children and school are involved as part of the scheme development.Reducing speed limits: 20mph speed limits are being more widely adopted as an appropriate speed limit for residential roads, and many through streets in built-up areas. 20mph limits alone will not be sufficient to meet the needs of active travel, but in association with other measures, reducing the speed limit can provide a more attractive and safer environment for walking and cycling.Introducing pedestrian and cycle zones: restricting access for motor vehicles at certain times (or at all times) to specific streets, or networks of streets, particularly town centres and high streets. This will enable active travel but also social distancing in places where people are likely to gather.Modal filters (also known as filtered permeability); closing roads to motor traffic, for example by using planters or large barriers. Often used in residential areas, this can create neighbourhoods that are low-traffic or traffic free, creating a more pleasant environment that encourages people to walk and cycle, and improving safety.Providing additional cycle parking facilities at key locations, such as outside stations and in high streets, to accommodate an increase in cycling, for example by repurposing parking bays to accommodate cycle racks.Changes to junction design to accommodate more cyclists – for example, extending Advanced Stop Lines at traffic lights to the maximum permitted depth of 7.5 metres where possible.‘Whole-route’ approaches to create corridors for buses, cycles and access only on key routes into town and city centres.Identifying and bringing forward permanent schemes already planned, for example under Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans, and that can be constructed relatively quickly.Other considerationsAll these measures can be introduced temporarily, either in isolation or as a combined package of measures. Some interventions, including new lightly-segregated cycle lanes, will not require Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). Others will require TROs, of which there are different types. The main ones are:Permanent: this process includes prior consultation on the proposed scheme design, a 21-day notice period for statutory consultees and others who can log objections; there can be a public inquiry in some circumstances.Experimental: these are used to trial schemes that may then be made permanent. Authorities may put in place monitoring arrangements, and carry out ongoing consultation once the measure is built. Although the initial implementation period can be quick, the need for extra monitoring and consultation afterwards makes them a more onerous process overall.Temporary: these can be in place for up to 18 months. There is a 7-day notice period prior to making the TRO and a 14-day notification requirement after it is made, plus publicity requirements. These are most suitable for putting in place temporary measures and road closures.Emergency legislation came into force on 23 May 2020 to amend, temporarily, the:The Road Traffic (Temporary Restrictions) Procedure Regulations 1992The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996The Secretary of State’s Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1990The amendments speed up making emergency Traffic Orders that may be needed to, for example, widen pavements or install cycle lanes. The main change is to the means of advertising the order, which can be via digital means. A second order still needs to be published for information 14 days later in a newspaper, where these are available, or via digital media.The amendments also allow, for non-emergency Orders, alternative publicity arrangements to help deal with some practical difficulties that have arisen as a result of restrictions that are in place. For example, these might be where local newspapers have closed or have moved publications on-line or local authority offices are closed to the public, and there are concerns about the safety of staff posting site notices in some circumstances. The amendments will cease to have effect as of 30 April 2021.Traffic signs may be needed to inform pedestrians, cyclists and drivers of changes to road layouts, particularly where temporary widening is in place. Advice on using existing signing, and some new temporary designs, will be published alongside this guidance. These are covered by the provisions of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 and as such do not need special signs authorisation from the department.Authorities should monitor and evaluate any temporary measures they install, with a view to making them permanent, and embedding a long-term shift to active travel as we move from restart to recovery.Access will still be required for other activities in the road, particularly street works, maintenance and other highway works, which will need to be balanced with work to reallocate road space to active travel. Street works and maintenance activity should carry on, as they will be essential to getting the economy going again. Use of the Street Manager digital service will help to plan and co-ordinate works.Depending on the measures they are installing, authorities will also need to consider access for Blue Badge holders, deliveries and other essential services as appropriate.Authorities should seek input from stakeholders during the design phase. They should consult with the local chiefs of police and emergency services to ensure access is maintained where needed, for example to roads that are closed to motor traffic. Local businesses, including those temporarily closed, should be consulted to ensure proposals meet their needs when they re-open. Kerbside access should be enabled wherever possible for deliveries and servicing.The public sector equality duty still applies, and in making any changes to their road networks, authorities must consider the needs of disabled people and those with other protected characteristics. Accessibility requirements apply to temporary measures as they do to permanent ones.

Bernard Allen ● 1858d0 Comments ● 1858d

Black Lives Matter peaceful socially distanced protest.

https://www.facebook.com/events/577516463202681/Sunday at 1:30 PM – 5:30 PM13–22°C Partly CloudyBrentford MarketMarket Place, TW8 8AH BrentfordJoin us on Sunday 28th June 1.30pm as we hold a peaceful protest with social distancing to continue to show solidarity with protesters against racism and demand racial justice globally. This is a family - friendly peaceful protest with a welcoming atmosphere and music. Please bring your beautiful artwork and banners. We will stand in line with social distancing rules on the wide pavements along side Virdict all the way up to Goddard's on Brentford high street. We should have enough room to make 2 lines, as well as the open space in Brentford Market. Meeting point:- Brentford Market at 1.30pm, then proceed to line up. AIM:- Kneel for George Floyd and the countless before him at 2pm. Chant the UK names of preventable lives lost:- Stephen Lawrence, Mark Duggan,Joy Gardner, Sara Reed Raise awareness with drivers and people passing, by encouraging then to honk their horns. It would be advisable to write slogans such as: Honk for Justice/Silence is Violence. Open Mic to share: Experiences, thoughts , art and anything related to facing discrimination all people of colour face. There will be a few minutes for each speaker to allow everyone to be heard. Once all have spoken the floor will be open to speak for longer. (Hoping to get a Community Leader Speaker) 2.30pm. Please bring a bag to put your rubbish in. Looking for:- Speakers for music Volunteers to be stewards of chanting and facilitating social distancing Ideas on how to make it better for everyone Please remember : Remain peaceful IF YOU HAVE SYMPTOMS PLEASE DO NOT ATTEND! Bring protective masks and gloves, and if possible wet-wipes or anti-bacteri gel Observe 2 metres social distancing guidelines Pack food and water Bring identification and emergency contact information Wear comfortable shoes Carry essential items like your medication or inhaler Women on periods are advised to wear pads instead of tampons incase toilet access is restricted Look forward to seeing you at the event!!!

Anil Patel ● 1883d26 Comments ● 1865d

Mobile Testing Unit for coronavirus

FOR ACTION: COMMUNICATIONS FOR CIRCULATION TO ALL RESIDENTS    Hi all,    Hounslow will be hosting a Mobile Testing Unit for coronavirus testing for residents at Grasshoppers' Rugby Club, Osterley, on Monday 29th June and Tuesday 30th June 2020.    Mobile Testing Units are an essential part of the national testing programme as they offer pedestrian appointments as well as drive-through appointments.    You must register via the gov.uk portal before attending a mobile testing unit and bring your 16-digit code or appointment confirmation with you on your mobile phone.    Testing site location: Grasshoppers Rugby Club Syon Ln Osterley Isleworth  TW7 5PN   Criteria for testing:  Anyone over the age of 5 who is symptomatic is now able to receive a test at one of the testing centres. You should be within the first 5 days of symptoms when you have your test, as otherwise it is not effective.    Coronavirus symptoms are:     • a high temperature     • a new, continuous cough     • a loss of or change to your sense of smell or taste   This test can tell you if you have coronavirus at the time the swab sample is taken. The test to tell if you’ve ever had coronavirus (‘antibody test’) is not available yet.   Book an appointment: Appointments are open for both Monday and Tuesday  at Grasshoppers' Mobile Testing Unit from 8pm on Saturday 27th June via the nhs.uk link:  https://www.nhs.uk/ask-for-a-coronavirus-test    If you would like a pedestrian appointment at the Mobile Testing Unit, please put “unknown” in the box requiring your vehicle registration number. This should allow you to continue the booking process.    If you have any problems refer to the helpline detailed below, or you can use the 16-digit authorisation code that is sent you via SMS and go to the testing centre anytime on foot or in a car between 10.30 and 15.30 where local authority staff will help you.    The testing centre will be operating between 10.30-15.30 on both Monday and Tuesday.     Alternative testing provision Please note that if an appointment is not available at the Grasshoppers’ site, then the same testing criteria apply for bookings at the Twickenham testing site and they operate 7 days a week. They do however only offer drive-in appointments.   There are also home testing kits available, bookable via the same website: https://www.nhs.uk/ask-for-a-coronavirus-test     Questions or problems If anyone has any problems booking via the portal, please contact the National Coronavirus Testing Helpline on 0300 303 2713    Capacity for testing is limited so is released on an hourly basis; it is recommended to try at regular intervals to access an appointment.    If you are displaying coronavirus symptoms you must self-isolate for one week from the start of the symptoms, and members of your household should isolate for two weeks from the start of your symptoms. If you are showing symptoms.    If you have any questions about testing, please contact publichealth@hounslow.gov.uk 

Bernard Allen ● 1879d2 Comments ● 1878d

A message from Cllr Steve Curran, Cllr Lily Bath and Cllr Katherine Dunne

I received an email on 12th June from these Councillors.  "we stand with the millions of people around the world who are saying loud and clear that Black Lives Matter"The capitalization leads one to infer they are referring to the organisation as well as the sentiment. https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ The BLM website makes it clear that this organisation has objectives beyond seeking justice for all people regardless race, for example:"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."For those in the know, this reeks of cultural Marxism, the program to destroy Western civilisation through systematic attacks on its values and institutions.I ask the senders of this email - are you comfortable with disrupting the "Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement"?I see no condemnation of the vandalizing of our public monuments that occurred during the weekend of 6/7th June, instead "We support the Mayor of London’s Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm to review the city's murals, street art, street names, statues and other memorials. We will fully participate in this review and take appropriate action when it is concluded." - so they are proposing to spend my taxes on a ridiculous exercise: at best virtue signalling, at worst an erasure of elements of British history for ideological reasons.BLM is objectively a racist organisation using tactics from Mao's cultural revolution, Pol Pot's Year Zero and Stalin's Soviet Union.  Objectively it also works to support the interests of the global elites by dividing workers.I fear Labour is a lost cause having been taken over by Marxist activists - are there any Labour voices left who have the courage to stand up to this?

Andy Riley ● 1888d17 Comments ● 1880d

Hancock's testing regime................

t really does get worse as Hancock has hired private firms to run the drive through testing sites rather than increase the NHs's own capacity, thereby rewarding friends of the Tory Party.The DoH failed to tell 'Private Eye' who these were so they did their detective work.Deloitte manages the process - operations on the ground are performed by a range of privatisers. One is Mitie - a former Tory leader of Westminster council - Baroness Couttie a mate of David Cameron is a board member and advised Dodgy Dave on 'public sector efficiency'. Mitie boast openly that the Baroness is a Conservative Whip.Next up - Compass - through its sports event subsidiary Levy. Their Chairman, Paul Walsh, was one of the business leaders who signed a 'vote Tory' letter ahead of the 2015 election.Then comes Serco who appointed Rupert Soames as Chief Executive in 2014, he is grandson of Winston Churchill and also brother in law of Tory MP Philip Dunne.One reader of Eye working at a site says temp. staff managed by outsourced contractors are showing 'shocking' standards of PPE awareness.  Boots supplied core testing staff for the first drive through centres many with clinical experience and all trained by pharmacists. However, then Sodexo was called in to supply both testing and training staff without medical experience. The reader said that on their site some testers will be trained by 'a Sodexo trainer, who only has to have actually performed three swab tests themselves to qualify as a trainer'.

Vanessa Smith ● 1916d12 Comments ● 1915d

Cure worse than the disease?

There is increasing discussion online and in the media regarding the "exit strategy".  At one extreme we could lift all restrictions soon and accept that the NHS may be swamped and that a lot of vulnerable people will die.  At the other extreme we continue with the lockdown restrictions until we have completed the NHS capacity ramp up, have sufficient antibody and antigen tests and have better data about prevalence, morbidity etc. There are costs associated with each strategy. Understandably, the stories of suffering and deaths dominate the headlines. But we know that there will be significant and increasing problems as the lockdown continues.  Business failing, unemployment rising, poverty increasing, childrens' education disrupted, mental health problems, domestic violence, breakdown of social order to list the obvious ones.There has been a remarkable consensus so far about the need to follow the government's instructions, perhaps because of the perceived authority of the scientific advisers.  But there is a fallacy in taking their advice as final. They are epidemiologists, virologists, clinicians etc. so they will tend to see problems from the perspective of their specialty. Ultimately this has to be a decision taken by us all collectively (no, I'm not talking about a referendum, I mean via our representatives locally and nationally, the media, and forums like this).I get the impression that the experts are still not in a position to give a timescale, so the lockdown seems to be open ended. Clearly this cannot continue for much longer.  Should we move to the Swedish model of a lighter approach? Should we set a deadline for easing restrictions?

Andy Riley ● 1962d24 Comments ● 1929d

GOOD NEWS.

Although we are going through a worldwide crisis, possibly never known so bad in human history, things are going to get better. The Bible promises: "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away." ( Revelation 21 v 4.) At present the whole world is going through a period known as the "last days" of a system that is about to be put right.2 Timothy 3:1-5 New International Version (NIV) says:(1)"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. (2) People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, (3) without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, (4) treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— (5) having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people."Is that a huge coincindence or is that an apt description of how many people in the world are today?Luke 21:10-11 New International Version (NIV) states:10 Then he (Jesus) said to them: “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. 11 There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events........"What is happening worldwide surely qualifies as seeing fulfillment today.This is the storm before the calm.“ALL creation keeps on groaning together and being in pain together until now.” So said the apostle Paul. (Romans 8:22) Despite advances in medical science, sickness and death continue to plague the human race. How wonderful, then, the promise that climaxes this part of Isaiah’s prophecy! Imagine the time when “no resident will say: ‘I am sick.’” (Isaiah 33:24)

Neil Milkins ● 1976d11 Comments ● 1974d

If you are self employed or a sole trader/operator

Many self employed are finding all their bookings and contracts being cancelled or postponed indefinitely.  Worse still many are having invoiced payments deferred using Coronavirus as justification.Many of these larger companies will be receiving help and directors may well be keeping their huge salaries and bonuses.There are several petitions to help long term self employed who pay Tax and NI in full but do not get any assistance that people in PAYE get.Govt on TV today stated Local Authorities have a remit to help but both Govt and Local council websites are full of hot air and no actual proper contact or pragmatic adviceHowever The House of Commons are asking for specific questions from this quite large sector of society so, as forwarded to me from others and asked to circulate and forward for others for whom this maybe a worrying concern.  Please copy and forward to anyone who may be in this vacuum“Include self-employed in statutory sick pay during Coronavirus”:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300336As the result of the large numbers of petitions and signatures we've received on coronavirus, we will be putting your concerns and questions directly to the Government at an evidence session (a question and answer session with representatives from the Government) in the coming days.Tell us what question(s) you'd like us to the ask the Government and experts in this short survey: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/petitionscommittee/We'll email you again to let you know more about the session, including when it's going to happen, who'll be taking part and how you can watch it live.We will also email you a link to the video and a transcript of the session afterwards.Who are we?We are the House of Commons Petitions Committee. We are a cross-party group of MPs that looks at e-petitions submitted on petition.parliament.uk. We are independent from Government. You can find out more about us and our work on our website: http://www.parliament.uk/petitions-committee/role

Raymond Havelock ● 1980d0 Comments ● 1980d

And still it goes on...........

You may remember the sorry saga of trying to help my elderly neighbours 'downsize' from a 3 bed house to a flat in a sheltered unit that was beset by so many problems you really couldn't have made it up. This started in November 2017 they were told to get ready and start packing up last April and then left living out of boxes for months on end while Hounslow faffed with converting previous staff accomodation in the sheltered unit into two more flats. Although Hounslow did eventually help them with storage and getting a cooker that they'd removed - still they sit waiting.First of all it was questions over building regs. and the consultant that had been in charge (consultant really?) then it was questions over fire regs. These of course are both important and vital areas that have to be right - but how long can this possibly take? So from last April when they were told to get ready to move until now, all there has been is excuse after excuse.Elected members have been found wanting, and only one housing officer was of practical help as far as she was able. This is a disgraceful state of affairs, how can a local authority not convert two flats in a sheltered unit in over a year? Hounslow claim they are desperate for family houses - this would free up one, and there's been another empty in the next road since before Christmas, wouldn't you think that some sort of urgency in utilising their scarce properties would filter through somewhere?This is an absolute scandal, not only leaving elderly people in limbo for over a year but failing people who are waiting for a family home. Useless.

Vanessa Smith ● 2403d76 Comments ● 2027d

Hounslow Council

Somewhat naively I assumed I could call the Council Tax number (020 8583 4242) as given on the Hounslow website and speak to an actual employee in the department just to query some issues. I was dealt with an individual from the outsourcing company which Hounslow has contracted to deal with Council Tax. The person I spoke to advised me to go online. I said I cannot find my issue online, and suggested I do not really have the ability to be so technically efficient. Astonishingly she said that "this is 2020 and everything is done online now" and I "should get into the modern world" and went further to ask if I "knew anyone who could assist me that might be more computer literate?" I was somewhat peeved with the implication that I didn't know what year it was! More so that she considered me incompetent. I asked if there was an alternative method. She said I could write a letter to the council (which seems like a retrograde step) or visit the Council Offices in person. I asked for the address. She could only tell me that it was in Bath Road.I asked her if she was actually in the premises? No, she works for the outsourcing company and can only give advice. She was not a Council employee.I have lived in this borough for nearly 40 years. I cannot recall an incidence when I could not call someone at the Civic Centre (when it was in Lampton Road) and speak to someone in it. Times have indeed changed. I have never been particularly impressed with Hounslow Council over those years - but I sincerely worry about their operational methods and detachment to their residents today.

Paul Brownlee ● 2048d6 Comments ● 2047d

Boston Manor Park

So following on from my email and pictures to junction2I got back this...Hello Helen, Please see the attached poster that is up at Boston Manor Park regarding the rectification works taking place after the Junction 2 event. We understand that there has been significantly more damage done to the park that previous years. And those who attended the Friday, Saturday or Sunday events will know that the park was not in this condition at those times. The extreme amount of rainfall that we have had this week has severely impacted the plans for the de-rig of the event. We took all available precautions, and discussed them with the council. The rain was so significant on Monday that we had to halt works on site in the afternoon, as there was an amber warning issued by the Met office at 3pm, stating ‘danger to life’ due to flood water. Unfortunately we need to have a period of dry weather for any works to be undertaken, otherwise any activity will cause further damage. The weather has also delayed our de-rig in some areas of the park. We can take some measures regarding the paths, and have contracted a road sweeper machine to clean the public paths today, and to continue to do this when all vehicles have pulled off, and the rain has (hopefully) stopped next week. I have attended the park today and removed the items that were left behind (the metal clamps and wooden boards in your picture). We understand that the damage at the moment looks like it will take a long time to repair, however we have been assured by the professional grounds maintenance company that we employ that this can be rectified reasonably quickly by taking simple steps. Once the ground is drier we will be smoothing the ruts caused by vehicle movement, and reseeding the grass. Please rest assured that we are being proactive in dealing with this, and take the condition of the park very seriously. We will be addressing the works as a matter of urgency once the ground is in a suitable state. We will be readdressing our wet weather provisions for future years. Thank you for your patience and understanding with this matter. AliceAnd this is poster BOSTON MANOR PARK RECTIFICATION WORKS JUNE 2019 Due to the unprecedented amount of rainfall during the de-rig period of the recent Junction 2 events, there has been some unforeseen damage as the vehicles have pulled off the park. The council have been working throughout with the event organisers to minimise the damage and rectify it as soon as possible. Before any works can be done to the damaged ground, we need to wait for the ground to dry. After this we will agree the necessary programme of works and undertake it as quickly as possible to return the park to full health. We have already added some extra woodchip to the paths in the wooded areas. After this we will look closer at the areas that may require further treatment.  We are also getting a road sweeper in to clean all tarmac paths once the rain has stopped and the vehicles are off site.

Helen Dickinson ● 2257d9 Comments ● 2056d

New Syon Park exit road

NEW EXIT ROAD PROPOSED FOR SYON PARK. FOLLOWS CLOSURE OF THE GARDEN CENTRE AND CHURCH STREET, AND DELAYS TO TRAFFIC INCLUDING TO THE ENCHANTED WOODLANDS. It will "provide the opportunity for the re-use of the garden centre and provide new employment opportunities."The planning application has just been filed with Hounslow Council. It states:Given the recent closure of Wyevale Garden Centre, Northumberland Estates are seeking to secure the long-term future of Syon Park, and the proposed link road is part of the wider strategy to ensure that Syon Park remains an attractive and sustainable location for new businesses and operators to occupy the now vacant garden centre.1.3  Recent changes to the surrounding highway network, particularly the closure of Church Street, have had an impact on the access and operation of Syon Park. The closure of Church Street had negatively impacted the number of visitors to Wyevale Garden Centre prior to its closure, as well as contributing towards increased travel times for visitors accessing Syon Park and Hotel.1.4  The closure of Church Street has required all traffic to travel via alternative routes (for example the Park Road/Twickenham Road and Busch Corner junctions). This change to the highway network has resulted in visitors to and from Syon Park experiencing significant journey times, with a direct result on business patronage and the long-term sustainability of Syon Park as a key visitor, leisure, and business destination.1.5  A recent example of this includes Syon Park’s annual Enchanted Woodland event, which was negatively affected by the surrounding highway network. The Park Road/Twickenham Road was subjected to three-way traffic lights which resulted in significant delays for visitors to the event, with many visitors taking up to two hours leaving Syon Park. The proposed London Road egress would have significantly alleviated this situation and allowed visitors to leave Syon Park without delay, also negating the need for two-way traffic along Park Road and thus benefiting the entirety of the surrounding highway network.1.6  The latest changes to the surrounding highway network have altered the previous historic arrangement and has effectively reduced Syon Park’s access and egress from two routes, at the Syon Park gates, to just one route along Park Road. The proposed development provides an alternative egress from Syon Park and will redress this position and re-instate the previous long-term highway access that Syon Park has benefited from.1.7  The key benefits of the proposed link road are:Provide the opportunity for the re-use of the garden centre and provide new employment opportunities at Syon Park, with sustainable transport links to the local highway networkEnable a more efficient egress route, particularly for hotel guests travelling via Heathrow Airport, avoiding the congestion of the local highway network, improving the reliability of journey times to Syon ParkA notable improvement to the cycle environment on Park Road as a result of the reduction in trafficReduction in traffic movement at the Park Road/Twickenham Road junction, improving capacity for local residents and cycle accessReduction in traffic at Busch Corner junction with traffic travelling eastbound on London Road able to avoid the junction when leaving the site1.8 Given the above, and the local highway context surrounding Syon Park, it is considered essential to deliver this link road to improve the capacity and access to and from Syon Park, making the site a more attractive and sustainable destination. Furthermore, the link road would have a significant benefit in alleviating traffic flow and over-capacity at other key locations in the local highway network.The development is for a one-way link road connecting Syon Park to the A315 London Road. The link road will be 3m wide, with a 1m service strip. The full stretch of road measures 179m and has been designed to achieve appropriate forward visibility along its full alignment. The road will tie-in to the existing road alignment adjacent to Syon Park Hotel, and a new barrier will be installed at the existing gate egress to London Road, along with new road markings and signage to ensure that the road is used safely and appropriately.The proposed link road has been designed by Caneparo Associates, and can be seen on the ‘Detail Design General Arrangement Plan’. The road has been designed to meander in a parkland style, with soft landscaping either side of the carriageway to soften the edge and provide sustainable drainage, as well as utilising all arisings on-site. A new post and rail fence and hedge is proposed at the new egress to London Road to provide a positive boundary treatment.

Reg Ghosh ● 2072d15 Comments ● 2065d

Consultation on the Isleworth cycleway

Hounslow council are 'consulting' on the above and council officers will be at Isleworth Public Hall Weds. 27 Nov. from 2.00.p.m. - 4.00.p.m.There is considerable disquiet - especially about the part of the cycleway that goes from Worple Rd. across South St. to IPH and beyond. The plan is to divide the pavement by way of a 'kerb' along the middle between pedestrians and cyclists and also to move the bus stop down South St. The reason for this is the nonsense that if two buses are passing there is not enough room, rubbish - as there is a lay by for buses going towards Hounslow to pull into. The new bus stop will only be a 'half stop' which will not afford much shelter for passengers. The conflict between pedestrians and cyclists in several places has been entirely overlooked. The proposed new bus stop will also affect traffic turning out of Worple Rd into South St. and also those wishing to turn into Worple from South St. This 'consultation' is the second attempt to foist this on local people, the first being a recipe for disaster. The 'consultation'on Hounslow's website consists of just one question - Do you agree? Yes - No - Don't know! What an insult - this is a Conservation area, there are NO comments from the Conservation officer, so much for that.Hounslow are desperate to get this thing through by hook or by crook, if you live locally please try and get along to the IPH on the 27th or go on to the website and give your views.https://haveyoursay.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic-and-transport/twickenham-to-brentford-cycleway-revised-proposals/

Vanessa Smith ● 2096d15 Comments ● 2078d

CIC forces closure of Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

Gunnersbury Park Bowling Club was formed in 1931. When the Community (now, there's a misnomer!) Interest Company took over the running of the Park, bowls club members were assured that CIC valued bowling, wished to see it continue and wanted to discuss ways of increasing use of the green by the general public. What were those assurances worth? Or Hounslow's Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, with its laudable aims of promoting both, but, in reality, nothing but hot air? Now the sports hall is running massively late and needs more money (were late-finishing penalties not included in the building contract?) and CIC are kicking out the bowls club to replace it with a secret sporting activity to produce revenue. CIC refuse to reveal what the secret activity is or to explain why there is such a need for secrecy. The bowls club did not cost the councils a penny; members looked after everything, including the upkeep of the green. Yet we are the sacrificial lamb, in another example of CIC shortsighted short-termism. We have been told that our site is just right for the new secret activity, but is it really believable that, had there been any goodwill or readiness to look for an alternative, there is nowhere else in the Park that could accommodate it? When/if this venture fails to generate the required revenue and packs up and leaves, the bowling green cannot be restored. Bowling was the one activity in the Park for the older members of the community; the bowling club was where for years we stayed active, socialised with friends and held competitions with other local clubs. All that has been disregarded and summarily thrown away by the autocratic CIC - judge and jury, unaccountable to the community whose interests it's meant to safeguard, not subject to oversight and strangers to transparency.

bela cunha ● 2090d12 Comments ● 2084d

Another loaded consultation, another 'done' deal

Having just taken a look at the 'consultation' on Parking Charges for Gunnersbury park, the level of loaded questions is a disgrace.They are comparing themselves with National Trust and Heritage England venues seemingly deluded that they are as important and attractive as those locations.It is OUR local park, bequeathed in covenant and trust to the people of Ealing, Acton and Brentford.It is funded one way or another through our taxes and yes, for far too long, it has been badly neglected by the ineptness of governance by it's custodians.But what have we now?  Buildings, new facilities, Yes. But way overdue, by a generation.But now, also not terribly affordable to the local populous.I usually cycle there. Take the car if  carting older or younger people or meeting friends and going on somewhere.Still, the the important fundamentals, like the  pathways are still awful making it poor for elderly walkers and toddlers and cyclists.Nor is the park easy to access for a quick visit.But to charge for the car park and justify it by comparing to venues that are not the same and not asking indeed, whether the charges are acceptable in any mode.There is even an inference that disabled badge holders will also be charged.No local residents of either borough over 60 should be charged at all.The car parks is almost deserted during the week. A hourly charge will hit the sports players as most games are 90 mins plus preparation and changing times so thats 2-3 hours.So where is the consultation question off whether to charge at weekends or when events are held?Maybe the cost of this form of managing this park in such a way is to high to be justified.Screwing the local people who support it on top of what all of us pay for whether we use it or not is completely wrong.It is a Public Open space free to use. Parking is part of that.  If it were stuffed full of vehicles 7 days a week and only 4 people in the place then maybe a different matter but it is not.As with Osterley Park which is now near deserted during the week, it now relies on corporate events to keep it's facilities alive. But local people especially the elderly are staying way as these charges left right and centre are not affordable.This is just like a TfL consultation.  Pointless as it is clearly already a done deal with everything in place.Shameful and contemptuous to all local residents of both Boroughs

Raymond Havelock ● 2146d4 Comments ● 2142d

There's none so blind.

There are times when some of our local councillors really do take your breath away. Take for instance the gem in Cllr. Lambert's weekly blog we have been treated to this week in respect of the planning application for The George Inn a Grade 2 listed building and former pub in Isleworth.The very real concerns of local residents dismissed in a couple of throw-away sentences:"Thursday evening was the Planning Committee. It was a packed hall, mainly with supporters of the proposal to turn the listed and unoccupied George pub in Isleworth into what some describe as an Islamic prayer centre and others describe as a mosque. We had had a bit of a preview of this proposal at an area forum meeting last year and I formed a favourable impression. Not much had changed in the meantime. Some locals are worried about traffic and parking impacts but the committee found it hard to see this as a decisive problem. The very urbane local Isleworth councillor Salman Shaheen suggested some conditions to the approval which everybody was happy with, but then we got into an absurd procedural wrangle which caused steam to emit from the ears of one dishonourable member (this one) as we wasted 15 minutes arguing about nothing. Anyway, approved."Leaving aside the 'procedural wrangle' which served to remind us that some people need to do some more homework on committee and planning issues, the detailed objection letter sent to ALL committee members setting out the local amenity society's and a local resident's association was reduced in the officer's report to five sentences.Now we have one of those committee members publicly patronising those same groups, as if we were a bunch of old dears with nothing else to do but have a whinge. As one correspondent e-mailed to me this morning - "he has completely undermined the concerns of local people as if they count for sod all. What chance do we have with pompous gits like him making decisions that will cause so many problems to residents?"Cllr. Lambert we need hardly remind locals around here was one of those same members who voted for the closure of Church St. which in no small way has added to the already congested local roads, and it is a decision that, two years down the line, still reverberates in Isleworth. This latest short-sighted decision will cause even more congestion, pollution and aggravation - but no matter - people who do not live here (apart from one) and care even less about something that will not affect them in the least go on their merry way without a thought for anyone. One day these 'representatives' might learn to listen - or at least try visiting an area before they come to any decision which clearly (apart from one who sees it on a daily basis) they hadn't. All Cllr. Lambert does is add insult to injury - but then we are usually referred to as 'the usual  suspects' - says it all really.

Vanessa Smith ● 2167d7 Comments ● 2146d

Ground Penetrating Radar Scan.

I am a True Crime Writer and Television Investigative Consultant. I have for the past 14 years been researching the horrendous crimes committed by Abertillery-born Harold Jones. In 1921, Jones then aged 15 murdered 2 Abertillery, Wales schoolgirls, Freda Burnell aged 8 and 11 year-old Florence Little. After being released from prison in 1941 Jones served 5 years in the army before settling in Fulham, Putney and finally Hammersmith where he died in 1971. Jones used a number of names during his time in London - first Harold Jones, then Harry Stevens and finally Harry Jones. Research has led myself and many criminal experts to believe that Jones went on to become the serial killer known as the Hammersmith Nudes' Killer (1959-1965.) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/488557/is-this-man-the-real-jack-the-stripper/These 8 unsolved killings have over the past 11 years been given much media attention. In 2011 a one hour drama documentary titled Fred Dinenage Murder Casebook - Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer has been shown repeatedly on various satellite Channels worldwide. (Google Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer.) This led to a major 90 minute national television documentary which was shown in January and February 2019. (Google Dark Son - The Hunt For A Serial Killer to see trailers.) In the early 1960's Jones using the name Harry Stevens  had lived in Fulham, 2 streets away from 3rd nudes's victim Hannah Tailford. In 1964 and 1965 whilst living in Putney under the name Harry Stevens, he was AT THE SAME TIME occupying a rented house in Hammersmith using the name Harry Jones. This was 2 streets away from 7th nudes victim Frances Brown and 8th nudes' victim Bridget O'Hara. It is my belief that there may be trophies buried in the garden at Hammersmith and the owner has now given me permission to use ground-penetrating radar to detect any such evidence.I am trying to locate someone in the film or media industry or anyone else who would be willing to cover the cost of the scan and record the garden being scanned. (Approximately 70 square metres.)On top of the circumstantial evidence regarding Jones living just 2 streets away from 3 of the murder victims below are a few more startling links.(1) Jones' own daughter has indicated that her father would leave her and her mother at home at the times of the killings and book into Rowton House, a doss house in Hammersmith whenever her parents would have a row. The daughter stated that she now believes her father would do this in fear that he may kill his wife in temper. Jones' own son-in-law stated that "There's no smoke without fire is there?"(2) Bridget O'Hara, the 8th victim was last seen leaving a pub near Rowton House on 11 January 1975 - Jones' birthday.(3) The person believed to be the killer had in 1964 shown one woman (a prostitute) a Metropolitan Police warrant card after she had got into his car. She stated that she felt very uncomfortable and made an excuse to get out of the vehicle. The driver gave her some cash before she got out. I believe the person was Harold Jones who was using the warrant card that had belonged to John Widdows, Jones father-in-law who had died just 2-3 years earlier. Widdows was a former London Metropolitan Police officer. Jones daughter stated that she still possessed her grandfather's retirement clock and Widdows may have possibly kept his warrant card when he retired.(4) At least 4 of the 8 murder victims were stored in a disused electricity sub-station on the Heron Trading Estate in East Acton. This was about 4 miles from Jones' rented property in Hammersmith. Jones daughter claims that her father worked in ACTON at the time of the murders but couldn't or wouldn't reveal which business premises he had worked at.(5) Jones left prison in 1941 after refusing treatment or discussing his crimes with the relevant authorities. The prison authorities noted that Jones, right to the day he was released showed no remorse for his crimes in Wales. Just shortly before his release the prison governor stated: "Sad as it seems, I can see no hopeful prospects for Jones in the future." The prison chaplain described Jones as "a no hoper." And then Jones was released onto an unsuspecting public possibly in the hope he would get killed in Libya where he served 5 years in the army.I am in contact with relatives of 6 of the 8 murder victims and they all (especially adult children of these women) are keen to know the identity of the killer in their lifetime. I am now 67 years old and I would like to know for sure the killer's identify in my lifetime.If anyone would like to come on board with this matter or have any practical suggestions I can be contacted at n.milkin@sky.com or 07989555376. Regards. Neil Milkins.

Neil Milkins ● 2149d3 Comments ● 2147d

PCNs in Enfield Road, Brentford

Over the last few weeks PCNs have been issued to drivers who park outside the controlled hours on the single yellow line which runs from 26 Enfield Rd down towards Eastbourne Rd.  They are being issued because people are, of necessity, parking with 2 wheels on the kerb.It's obvious that if we don't park with 2 wheels on the kerb (in the same way as cars in the marked bays) we risk getting our cars damaged and/or completely blocking the road. The road is just not wide enough to park safely with all 4 wheels on the carriageway. When the CPZ was first implemented (about 6 years ago) I recall having a conversation with the man from the Council who was in charge of organising it all and was assured that kerb parking would be permitted on the single yellow outside the controlled hours.It is only very recently that tickets have been issued. I received a ticket at 8.30pm but most of them seem to have been issued between 11pm and midnight. 5 were issued at about 11.30pm the night before last. People who come home late and can't find anywhere else to park are particularly affected - some might say "targeted".I've raised the issue with Cllr Lambert who is sympathetic but has apparently been unable to get any response from the traffic team.  The bottom line is that if we can't park with 2 wheels on the kerb then we can't park at all and lose parking space for approximately 8 - 10 cars.  If the reality is that we cannot park at all in that location then the signage should make that clear.Could those who've been affected and those who don't want to lose this parking space lobby our Councillors to express their view?  I'm appealing my ticket and am quite prepared to take it to the Adjudicator if necessary.

Alison Robins ● 2151d12 Comments ● 2149d

Scammers - 'Tommy's Gardening Services' - Brook Road South and possibly beyond

My husband was ripped off today by a man offering to take away our garden waste. (I know, I know...)I returned home at about 2.00pm from a meeting in central London to find a man wearing a yellow hi-vis jacket in our front garden, loading bags onto the pavement, presumably for collection. My husband went to a local ATM to withdraw cash, which he gave to the man in return for a business card - Tommy's Gardening Services 07388 268 450. I called a number of times and was reassured that they were coming back - of course, they never showed up. The number is now going straight to answerphone. (Of course, we put the bags back into the front garden, as they were causing an obstruction on the pavement. We also swept up the dead leaves and mess.)I have reported it to the police (they won't be interested) and our neighbours have the man filmed on CCTV. He'd been trying to get a response from an elderly neighbour who had been badly ripped-off some months ago. I'm very glad to report they didn't succeed with her.I know it's the oldest trick in the book and - had I been at home - I'd have no compunction in telling them where to go. Sadly, my husband is a much nicer, more trusting human being. Please, please, please tell all cold-callers to sling their hook. My husband was only ripped-off to the tune of £50, but I still want to find them and cause them actual bodily harm. See, I told you I wasn't nice.

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 2167d15 Comments ● 2157d

Another one bites the dust

Can someone tell me if there's a plan to obliterate every old building in Brentford?O'Riordan's Tavern is to be demolished and replaced with... wait for it... new-build flats. Because, obvs, there's a shortage of those in the area. And, as we all know, they're in very high demand.Is it really beyond the imagination of a developer to take a tired (but pretty) building and give it a little TLC? I realise that it was not viable as a boozer, but I know a couple of people who live in old converted pubs - and they're stunning dwellings. Of course, it's much easier to bulldoze and put up an undistinguished bit of pre-fab horror which will have a shelf-life of - say - 25 years before it'll want tearing down again, but really? That's the best they can do?By and large, the people planning, designing and making decisions about our area don't live in it - it's easy to trash something if you don't have to look at it on a daily basis. And, as I've said before (to deaf ears), it takes a moment to demolish a building, but in that moment years, decades, centuries of history is consigned to the dustbin. What replaces it is very seldom worthy of praise. (Anyone remember a certain D J Trump demolishing the Bonwit Teller building in Manhattan and taking the beautiful bas-relief sculptures with it? It's not a million miles from this.) It still beggars belief that - at the very least - the Barclays and Post Office facades could not have been saved and incorporated into a new development. It's been done before, many times, and successfully too. Significantly, the old Wilson & Kyle building featured in a Guardian article about derelict buildings. I've long said that if it had been located in Shoreditch or Hackney, it would have been refurbished and given a new lease of life as achingly hip flats or workspaces. But here? Too much to ask. Much better employed as a billboard before it's flattened.I'm afraid that some committee's decision to throw around a couple of swimming pools-worth of sky blue paint, picking a funky sans-serif font and labelling something a 'project' does not inspire confidence or engender civic pride. It's patronising. Especially when they construct a watchtower too brutal for even the Korean DMZ, without planning permission - or shame.So now it's goodbye to quirky, pretty little O'Riordans, part of the landscape since 1841 - and hello to... well, more of the same. Lucky us. Lucky, lucky us.

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 2193d56 Comments ● 2172d

Proposals to Refurbish Brentford Towers

I am really glad the LBH have decide to refurbish the Brentford Towers (article on front page) instead of pulling them down as was rumoured a few years ago. They look in a sorry state at the moment and look rather scruffy against the new high rise that have been built next to them.It seems that LBH are embarking on quite an extensive refit, by cladding the outside of the building, replacing the windows, boilers, enclosing balconies and removing hidden asbestos and hopefully creating 17 more flats.My one concern is with the Lease Holders within the tower blocks, they are surly going to have to contribute a share for their flat within the overall upgrade of the building.I hope they don't end up large bills similar to the projects in Sutton and Reading, and are given time to pay, if they have to pay anything at-all, hopefully not.From front pageTwo public engagement events have already happened. The remaining ones take place at the Ground floor meeting room in Cornish House.On Wednesday 17 May, 3-7pm: Residents from 1-88 Boulton House & 1-88 Wicksteed HouseSaturday 20 May, 10am-12pm: Invited residents from neighbouring properties and any residents who are unable to make previous sessions Monday 22 May, 3-7pm: Invited residents from neighbouring properties and any residents who are unable to make previous sessions For more details please email Sukhi Randhawa and comments or queries to Affordable.housing@hounslow.gov.ukThe consultation ends on Monday 5 June 2017

Bernard Allen ● 3016d29 Comments ● 2186d

Ruth Cadbury and Boris Johnson

I am no apologist for our new PM and I have a great respect for our current MP, but I have to correct one of Ms Cadbury's comments ref. Boris Johnson.Mr Johnson's comments concerning what he thought about women wearing the burqa have been repeatedly reported out of context. In the Daily Telegraph article in which the comments were made he was highly derogatory about … the Danish. Yes, the Danish. The Danes had introduced a law banning the wearing of the burqa in public and police had been humiliating Muslim women in public by forcibly removing them. This, Johnson argued, was not the liberal attitude one normally associates with the Danish people. Johnson went on to say that while there was no Quranic requirement to wear the burqa, that he thought the were degrading to women and ridiculous nevertheless if an adult woman wishes to wear a full-face covering in public then she should be able to do so. In short Johnson was arguing against intolerance and in favour of a Muslim woman's right to wear a burqa even (or perhaps especially) when he (i.e. Johnson) personally disagreed.In short he was upholding the maxim: "I disagree with every word you say, but shall fight to the death for your right to say it." That, at least in my mind, is the mark of a true liberal. Now whether Johnson is the right person to lead the country is a moot point and one which I will not comment on, but beware of comments taken out of context.PS the original article was entitled 'Ah, Denmark". I'm sure you can find it on Google, like I did.

John Bradley ● 2216d13 Comments ● 2204d

Nice to know whose side the council is on..................

How long before another planning application appears? Will people in Isleworth be able to rely on the council's support to tell the Duke where he gets off after losing the planning inquiry last October, or will the Supreme Leader and his aristocratic chums work against the peasants? A Labour council? really?PR 1034201 August 2019For Immediate ReleasePark Road Allotment holders receive six-month extension Following negotiations between Hounslow Council and the Northumberland Estate, agreement has been reached to extend the Park Road allotment holders leases by six-months until September 2020.The Council is committed to working with Syon Park Estate Management to prepare plans for the sustainable management of the Estate, and to design a scheme that meets its objectives whilst continuing to serve the community.This positive agreement will allow all the parties more time to continue discussions to find acceptable ways forward.Cllr Steve Curran, Leader of Hounslow Council, said:“I’m pleased that we have been able to work together to allow the allotment holders to stay on site for a further six months.  I’m hopeful that our continuing dialogue will deliver a solution that is acceptable to all.”Colin Barnes from the Northumberland Estate, said:“We are confident that we will agree a way forward which delivers a good solution for all parties and allowing more time to achieve that makes sense. Both ourselves and the Council want a sustainable future for Syon Park that preserves its heritage and benefits local people and we will work positively to make that happen.”Ends AttachmentsPark Road Allotment holders receive six-month ext Park Road Allotment holders receive six-month ext Media EnquiriesContact: Jini Amarasekara T: 020 8583 5634 M: 07947 137020 (out of hours) E: jini.amarasekara@hounslow.gov.uk

Vanessa Smith ● 2210d1 Comments ● 2210d

Statement on elevated pollution levels at Boston Manor Park

Statement from Hounslow Council on reports of elevated pollution levels at Boston Manor ParkPublished: Tuesday, 4th June 2019 "It has come to our attention that the Air Quality England website reported high levels of pollutant particles at Boston Manor Park in Brentford over the weekend and on Monday 3 June. We are advised that this is likely due to the large-scale set-up for the Junction 2 music event, taking place on the 7-8 June. Organisers have been using power generators and heavy goods vehicles to set up for the event, giving rise to large-scale dust. Particulate matter pollution was measured at one of the borough’s air monitoring station located close to Boston Manor Park.“We would advise that residents avoid the area of Boston Manor Park where the work is taking place while particulate matter levels are at a high level.“However, the current rainfall in the borough will remedy much of the increased pollution since it washes away particulate matter and can also wash out pollutants that are dissolvable”“You can receive air quality alerts by signing up to our free airTEXT service, which sends alerts via SMS text, voicemail message or email when pollution levels are higher than normal for Hounslow. The website provides air quality, UV, pollen and temperature forecasts for the Borough, warns if high pollution is forecast, and provides health advice.For further information and to sign up please see: http://www.airtext.info or text ‘AirTEXT Hounslow’ to 78070” More articles in the news archiveLondon Borough of Hounslow news RSS feed

Bernard Allen ● 2267d3 Comments ● 2262d

Alfa Laval/Brentford Nylons Tower

Does anyone know the current state of play for the re-use and refurbishment of this building? I see that detailed planning permission was granted on 17 January 2017 for the use of the building as a 180-bed hotel and 4,667 square metres of offices. Other buildings were permitted in the same decision notice but it's not clear which, if any, of these form part of the already completed development (the dwellings, Premier Inn etc.) within the old Baltic Centre site.When I went along to a presentation, by Hunter Page Planning, at the Novotel in about September 2015 I got the impression that the plan at that time was for Hyundai to use the tower as their flagship showroom and offices. Is this still the intention?Whatever the precise plans I wonder if there is any indication of a timetable for the refurbishment. Alfa-Laval moved to Camberley in about 1996 and the tower has been derelict since then. It's high time for this eyesore to be given a makeover and for the advertising hoardings to be removed.  As an aside, it may be that about 137 housing units have already been built on the old Baltic Centre (which is now called Westside and includes Baltic Avenue). These were originally described as a mix of private and "affordable" homes and when they first went on the market in 2015 prices began at £310,000. I see from Zoopla that the average price in Baltic Avenue has been £535,000 and a 4-bed unit recently went for £795,000.

Jim Storrar ● 3122d29 Comments ● 2265d

Disregarding History?

It should be a concern for Brentford's history to conserve the Barlow rails alongside Dock Road, many of which have disappeared during the course of demolition and site works opposite Morrisons.Brunel had used his Baulk rails for the Great Western Railway. I have found no details for the rail used in the Great Western and Brentford spur, but presumably these would have to have matched those used in the main line? In 1849 W H Barlow had invented the Barlow Rail profile to be laid direct on ballast without use of sleepers, and Brunel adopted these for the South Wales Railway.These latter went out of general use fairly swiftly, owing to maintenance costs, and large amounts of them were being sold off by the mid to late 1850's, when Brunel's Brentford trans-shipment depot was built (opened in 1859). Use of the rail for fencing is characteristic along Brunel's various railway lines, so retention of even a portion of these along Dock Road would preserve at least a small bit of Brentford's fast vanishing history.Those not so kept should be offered to museums, and hopefully not consigned to scrap metal dealers. I have raised this concern at the last BCC meeting, and councillors have promised to look into this, but I have heard nothing back.Another, related worry, is the amount of site work, drilling and concreting that seems to progress to the detriment of a proper archeological survey of the newly cleared area. This has never been excavated previously, to my knowledge, so it is vitally important that the planning conditions mandating such a survey should be enforced - and this done quickly, before integrity of the site is further compromised, and the plea go up that it would prove all too expensive now that so much work has already been done.

Nigel Moore ● 2422d34 Comments ● 2269d

LBH Wilful Parking Inaction Endangers Lives in Isleworth

The other day we had five ambulances, a fire engine and a police car outside our living room window, trying without success to access the estate on which we live.  The reason for their lack of success was that two cars were parked side by side across the very narrow stretch of Town Field Way which is the sole access and exit from the estate, leaving a gap of less than two feet between them.The West Middlesex estate comprises 143 dwellings and the adjacent White Lodge Close 149 dwellings.  All of the latter and 99 of the former were blocked to vehicles when this double parking took place, a total of 248 households.Incredibly, this road blockage was not the first of its kind.  In fact it happens on an approximately weekly basis and has done for several years since a bay was made available for a Car Club without any restrictions first having been placed upon the space directly opposite.  Anybody using the space opposite the Car Club bay for parking can do so legitimately, and then if a car is returned by a club user that too may lawfully be parked in its allocated bay, creating said blockage of access to and from 248 dwellings.I reported this to one of our ward councillors several years ago, and also to a senior officer dealing with parking at LBH.  Whether it is because I was the person who reported it (and they are certainly petty and insecure enough for this to be the case) or whether it was down to good old-fashioned inefficiency no attempt to rectify the situation (a process which would involve the painting of about 12-15 feet of double yellow lines on one side of the road) has been made at any time during this entire period.Following last week's incident the police have taken it upon themselves to place cones along one side of the road to ensure access.  Are our local councillors (one of whom is the Leader of the Council) at all embarrassed by this?  Presumably if they are they will finally despatch a man with a brush and a can of yellow paint to perform this highly complex and intricate operation in the very near future.  If they don't, then judge for yourselves the level of contempt in which ordinary residents of this borough are held by those who profess to represent them.

Phil Andrews ● 2325d6 Comments ● 2311d

Just how dopeyBackward can LBH get?

A letter today informing that all CPZ applications must be online from now on.That's fine if you have a safe private computer. But the mandatory requests for information are of a nature that is not supposed to be copied or transmitted. Lot's of work venues including our own now prevent scanning of documents and emailing or transmitting them.But spare a thought for the great many who do not have internet access and in particular safe internet access. Or cannot use a computer let along a scanner.Nowhere on this latest missive is any sort of information on what to do if you are not internet savvy. ( It is still 40% of over 60s and rises with age as many who are able find eyesight and arthritis and age related ailments hinder easy use of the devices most of us take for granted.Not a telephone number, name or postal address.  Email or web contact only.The advice given out is to go to  or library or get someone else to do it online for you.However that is actually a breach of the data protection act and in most cases such procedures would need proof of power of attorney for matters which handle documents and personal details.This " advice" also completely contradicts all the advice for less able computer users to stay safe.Never ever input personal details,or documents onto a public computer or a shared computer.So for those few why is this council not signed up to the Keep Me Posted initiative to stop this nasty and stressful mentality stressing so many less able people.?

Raymond Havelock ● 2338d5 Comments ● 2338d

Last chance for Brentford?

This might be a TLDR for some - if so, apologies in advance. Mr DC and I went for a walk in the winter sunshine yesterday afternoon. We looked at the south side of the High Street and felt utter despair; almost everything closed, demolition on the horizon. The gross vandalism of Georgian and Victorian buildings. (Even the less lovely building opposite Morrison’s and the Beehive… history and interest doesn’t have to be 200 years old and pretty. The County Court is a good case in point.)What’s to become of the beautiful NatWest building? It had a fantastic interior, even when overlaid with panelling and plastic. The building that housed the Post Office? Look above street level at the roof line and at the windows. It’s fantastic. Peel away the crummy PO frontage and it’s a gem. Even the building next door to that (Paddy Power at street level) – just slightly pre-war, I’d guess – has a decorative brickwork detail that someone had thought about. It wasn’t just thrown together. Go and have a look; cast your eyes above the ground floor and take it in. Not for the first time, I reflected upon the tricks missed by Hounslow Council, and the developers who will lay waste to swathes of the area’s history and charm, replacing it with serried ranks of cookie-cutter developments of absolutely no architectural merit whatsoever. What a shame.It’s the depressing lack of imagination and complete lack of understanding of what makes a cohesive community that gets to me the most. These new developments simply don’t work. Let me explain.I remember visiting a friend living in Bermondsey a while back. I don’t know if you know the area, but as recently as 20 years ago, Bermondsey was pretty grim. (Ditto Shoreditch – and look what’s happened there - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10571976/In-defence-of-the-Shoreditchification-of-London.html) After dinner, we went for a walk. Around us lay Maltby Street, where thriving businesses have been built out of railway arches, Ropewalk and Druid Street, full of people and life, and Bermondsey Street itself, buzzing with restaurants, bars, galleries and independent shops. We turned a corner – suddenly we were in the piazza of a new development, surrounded by new-build monoliths. Devoid of people, the only lights on were at Gregg’s Table, the ‘concept’ restaurant and brainchild of Gregg Wallace from MasterChef. It was empty. (I believe it’s now closed down.) It was a ghost town – and the contrast could not have been greater. And that’s what’s lined up for the south side of Brentford High Street. If someone – anyone – had employed a little imagination, the old buildings of Brentford would not have been slated for demolition. If someone – anyone – had thought that by refurbishing these buildings and letting them at affordable prices, it would have attracted small businesses and creative industries to the area. They would need to eat lunch and shop, thereby organically creating a demand for services from other small businesses (and some larger ones). Those people might eventually want to live nearer to their work, creating a demand for accommodation. All of this would be paying scads of cash into Hounslow’s coffers, only they’re too damned short-term and greedy to think like that. With thought, sensitivity and far-sightedness, Brentford could rival Chiswick for the title of Hounslow’s cash cow – AND leave current residents in place. But no… much easier sell off one of the last ‘affordable’ parts of riverside London by the pound, pull everything down and build a giant Gregg’s Table, but with even less charm and longevity.  Here’s the thing: flats don’t attract people – a vibrant, functional community does. Building hundreds and thousands of flats, to be sold off-plan and offshore, does not benefit Brentford one iota. Does Hounslow Council not care or are they just too stupid to understand? We find ourselves on a cusp here: the falling pound, the Brexit fiasco, a looming lack of construction workers… it all adds up to the sort of situation that gives developers the fear. Is it possible to stop at least some of this madness? Surely they now want out? The hideous and utterly unwanted Morrison’s development, for instance? Could some money be poured into Watermans to turn it into the Little South Bank that it could and should be? Could some forward-thinking, imaginative people be employed to cherish what’s already here, give it a little TLC and make it… sexy? It's not impossible; look what's happened to the Albany Arms. Having said that, it was rescued, by the skin of its teeth, from being turned into... flats. Kudos to Peter, Ash and James for not letting that happen - and we must support them so that it doesn't happen in the future. Destruction takes seconds. When our environment is gone, it's gone. There are no second chances. Come on, Brentfordonians – what do you think? Is there still time?

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 2393d54 Comments ● 2354d

New Ealing ePetition about those Dockless bikes

Are you happy with the way these new bikes just landed on our streets? Within weeks they seemed to become randomly distributed around all our local roads left in an amazing variety of inconvenient places – often on their side and some have even been seen in rivers.There’s a new petition about this on the Ealing Council website & there’s a separate one for Hounslow – see below)https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspxOBJECTIVES1. To have a council debate2. The council then to agree to a public consultation (same as Hounslow council - https://haveyoursay.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic-and-transport/dockless/consultation/intro/ )3. Ealing council to agree to a complete scheme review based on the results of the public consultation  • These are commercial schemes which should be creating a new, flexible and cheap choice of transport.  • Instead, many users seem to ignore pedestrians who might just want to walk on uncluttered pavements and roads    o With blocked thoroughfares life gets harder.    o Harder for the young    o Harder for Mums with buggies or pushchairs    o Harder for our more elderly neighbours    o Harder even for the users – who wants to get to a bike on the app at the end of a cul de sac?  • Any other type of pavement/road blockage is often regarded as unlawful  • There was recent news came that the bikes had also been used in drug related crime  • If the gps technology is vandalised they can simply go off grid and are left  • If the batteries run down the operators say they can simply go off grid and “disappear”  • It can also be argued the schemes are in breach of the tfl code of practice   • http://content.tfl.gov.uk/dockless-bike-share-code-of-practice.pdf  • There simply seems to be no scheme management at all which is not consistent with what tfl seem to think is appropriateThe petition on the council website (https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspx) needs 1500 signatures to “win” a council debate The deadline for the 1500 signatures is March 18th

Don Tanswell ● 2366d5 Comments ● 2355d

Brentford is closed!

From Brentford Today on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/groups/brentfordtoday/permalink/374200276675074/?__tn__=K-RTHE GREAT BALLYMORE SILENCEBRENTFORD IS CLOSED. WE'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S HAPPENING – IN SIX MONTHS' TIME! AS ANGER AND SUSPICION GROW, THE TOWN GETS IMPATIENT.As half the high street turns into a ghost town, and Brentford people wait for snippets from on high, Councillor Mel Collins puts it succinctly: "The drip-drip effect just fuels anger and suspicion to the local community."Bang on, Mel.Cllr Collins adds: "We are in exciting times. Let us be open and celebrate the fact."Then he pleads rather desperately: "Is it possible to give a more comprehensive outline as to what is actually happening over the next few months?"Good question. So Brentford Today put it to Ballymore HQ. External Affairs Manager Jennifer Ball said: "Thanks for reaching out. In terms of further communications, we will be opening an information centre on site this summer, which will feature exhibition space and site models. We are working towards the launch of this amenity intended to engage and inform local people, and improve awareness of plans. More news on this will be available in the coming months."IN THE COMING MONTHS! THIS SUMMER! Are they joking? If they want to engage us, they are going the wrong way about it.Council leader Steve Curran seems as frustrated as anyone. He says: “I’m already in discussion with Ballymore to ensure that we have clear communications by the end of January.”However that's just a "discussion". Ballymore's official position refers to "summer" and "months".Surely Brentford deserves better than this. The south side looks like one of those Wild West ghost towns after the gold mines run out. It'll soon fall down on its own, with tumbleweed blowing along the footpath. You walk past shutters and barred doors and find the post office which bears a scribbled note: closed.Brentford's heart is in cardiac arrest.Well, if it's going to be redeveloped, you'd expect closures at some point. Understandable. What you don't expect is the utter lack of detailed information. It's rude, it's disrespectful. Look on Hounslow council's website. Almost nothing. Look on Ballymore's website. "Reinvention Meets Restoration," it says. "16,250 sq m of new retail floorspace, a 3000 sq m grocery store, a gym and leisure centre and an arts centre/cinema. Retaining several heritage buildings and thoroughfares…"Where's the detail? Where's the plan?Or don't ordinary Brentford people matter?Cllr Guy Lambert says they are "pressing our friends Ballymore to communicate more speedily!" Note the word "friends". Nobody wants to fall out. Ballymore are big and powerful but this is not some minor development on the outskirts. It is right at the heart of Brentford – half the high street is about to be knocked down – hence it is called Regeneration. It's not just a few flats. It's Brentford itself. The biggest change in a generation, perhaps ever.People are asking, quite rightly: "Why are we not being kept fully informed?" Otherwise confidence in the project is being undermined, day by day.Brentford Today stands with Cllr Curran. The people of Brentford need to be told exactly what is happening. And when. They need to be told very soon.

Reg Ghosh ● 2419d32 Comments ● 2370d

Brentford and its people in 1928

Since I found this site I have read so much about the town where I was born in 1928. It means quite a lot to me to read how Brentford as changed/grown since my family died-out in 1960's.At one point in it's history it was either owned by the 'Smith's''Luffrum's' and 'Brown's......….Smith's Yard was named of my Aunt'sFather who at one point owned the 'Ligherage' in the area -  and build the cinema Queen's Hall for his two daughters.Part of Brentford Football Ground was built on land that originally belonged to my Grandfather. My Great Grandmother organized a schoolin the Hall next to St. George's Church - for her 12 children and anyother children who cared to attend [but the did have to pay 1 penny a week to cover the cost of the 'slate and pencil' and also to ensure that the really wanted to learn.I started my education at 4yrs. at the 'Bluebird School' Clifton Roadthen on to St.Paul's Church School. Played on the Recreationground - as did my Son when a small child - when we returned to visitthe family......Of course I am 90 years old now but have led a fantastic life - I still work [unpaid of course] in the local churches - have been a Lecturer in the City of London - was in Berlin during the Airlift in 1948.  Even so still retain a great interest in local history - so if I can fill any of Brentford's gaps I would be very happy to help...….I am a published author [Non-fiction]Freddie Montgomery [Mrs]

Freddie Montgomery ● 2390d2 Comments ● 2383d

Prolific Murderer - Harold Jones?

Further to the B.B.C. 4 documentary Dark Son - The Hunt for a Serial Killer being broadcast nationally at 9.00 pm on Tuesday February 12.  South Wales Police are actively pursuing forensic opportunities to link Abertillery-born Jones to the murder of 12 year-old Swansea school-girl Muriel Joan Drinkwater, 3 months after he left the army in 1946. A third cold-case team are actively researching Jones' possible involvement in the murder of Ignac Ulycz in Putney in August 1965. See information below from my book "Who Was Jack the Stripper? The Hammersmith Nudes' Murders."(At 10.45 pm on Sunday 15 August 1965, Mr Ignac Ulycz was fatally stabbed outside his own front gate at 323 Upper Richmond Road Putney...........Maddalena Ulycz told the police the assailant was between 50 and 60 years old. (Jones was 59.) Another witness said that the attacker had run around the corner into Colinette Road and just seemed to vanish into thin air. (Jones had been living in 20 Colinette Road.)The Wandsworth Boro' News of Friday 24 September 1965 reported on the inquest into the death of Mr Ulycz.........."The man who killed Mr Ulycz........may have been insane or a psychopath who every now and again feels the desire to attack someone in this way" suggests the Coroner Mr Gavin Thurston.)The fact has now emerged that Jones was living at 20 Colinette Road Putney using the name Harry Stevens while AT THE SAME TIME registered as living at 51 Aldensley Road Hammersmith under the name Harry Jones.

Neil Milkins ● 2384d0 Comments ● 2384d

Update on Brentford's remodeling

Hey Guys - Does anyone have an update on whats occurring in Brentford across all the various projects that are going on at the moment? The Brentford Today/Brentford TV Facebook group seems to be the only place where everything that matters in terms of the "regeneration" is being posted but unfortunately it feels a bit "National Inquirer"styIe as opposed to concrete official updates. Is there one central place where we can find out a complete summary of what is going on in terms of:- Morrisons and - Brentford High street now that we are without a post office - The Waterman Arts Centre and when its moving- The Old police station and its development- Where there are building works going on, are Historic England involved to preserve this historic locationOne would imagine this website would be the place to summarise all of these and other developments that are occurring. There are lots of rumours and stories going round... I even heard today that they are sizing up St. Paul's recreation park for potential development. I feel incredibly sad that our town, one I have lived in for 20 years now - is literally being demolished with no real joined up plan to make it a special place to live despite the money that has been generated from all of the land sold off and supposed investment in the area. I hear Hounslow High Street is being developed and they have a plan... where's ours?I see Mr Curran has a session on 24th Jan to discuss the population explosion and appealing to us to provide answers to questions that we asked him directly two years ago when the Morrisons and various other sites were being sold off to greedy developers...

Lisa Deegan ● 2402d11 Comments ● 2395d

Kensington to Hounslow corridor

Over the last 5 years there has been massive construction of private apartments along the corridor from Kensington to Hounslow, such that currently, during the morning and evening extended rush hours being able to get on a bus has become more and more difficult.On this route, the access to the Piccadilly line to get to Heathrow has escalator/lift access at only Hammersmith and East/West Hounslow. This means that disabled people, those who suffer from claustrophobia and those with heavy baggage in this area, are forced to use a taxi, at a cost of £20 - £40. When the matter has been raised over the last few years with TFL, the ongoing excuse is that it would make the route too long!  So if that is the case, would TFL give consideration to introducing a new service to start, when the N9 stops its extension during the day, known as an EXPRESS service 9 (X9) running during the day and only stopping at centres of commercial areas with many other local bus services, or underground, serving as a feeder service. This would have a considerable number of benefits for all users plus those who want to travel long distances on the existing services, being able to travel quicker than staying on the local bus service, as with the 607 along Uxbridge RoadPROPOSED BUS STOPSHammersmith Bus Station, (Start point of service) Stop BTurnham Green Church Stop DD/CVBrentford High Street Stop BL/BNIsleworth Stop FHounslow West Station Stop AHeathrow Central Bus Station Stand 19Heathrow T5 Stand 6All these stops are on the existing N9 service route.BONUSWith ongoing problem of existing road congestion, and the construction of the new runway, it is forecast that there will be considerable delays in the local area. As a case in point on the morning of 9 November I went to collect a passenger from T3 and it took 1 HOUR to get from the junction with the M4 into Terminal 3! In the event that these sorts of congestion arise again, the Local TFL area manager can decide to turn the bus around at Hounslow West station, thus allowing passengers for Heathrow to transfer onto the Piccadilly line into LHR.If you support this concept for an additional service, every concerned person would be gratefully appreciated. To do this, please send an email to your MP and London assembly representative.  Please also put any ideas that make the idea more relevant, and then post them to the forum.'See https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/ where you can find details of you MP and https://www.london.gov.uk/people/assembly for your GLA representative. When posting your support, copy and paste the above leaving the last paragraph off the paste.

Philip Weaver ● 2443d1 Comments ● 2414d

B.B.C. Documentary.

B,B.C. 2 Wales at 9.00 pm on January 12. For viewers with Sky and Freeview it can also be seen on the same date and time. Otherwise for viewers throughout the U.K it can be viewed at 9.00pm pm on B.B.C.4 on January 22.                                                                                                                             It is the biggest unsolved serial murder case in British criminal history - the so-called 'Jack the Stripper' murders took place in Swinging Sixties London.Six women lost their lives to a killer who was never caught. Criminologist Professor David Wilson leads an investigation to unmask the killer, who claimed more victims than even his notorious Victorian namesake, Jack the Ripper.Professor Wilson and his investigative team - which includes former detective Jackie Malton and forensic psychologist Professor Mike Berry - begin their hunt for the killer not in London, but 150 miles away in Abertillery, South Wales. In 1921, the Welsh mining town was devastated by the double murder of two schoolgirls when eight-year-old Freda Brunell and 11-year-old Florence Little were killed just weeks apart by a local boy 15-year-old Harold Jones, who the Abertillery residents still refer to as their 'Dark Son'.Those murders - especially the sadistic nature of their deaths, and the treatment of the bodies afterwards - have eerie parallels with the 'Jack the Stripper' murders. Could Harold Jones the boy killer really have matured in later life into a serial killer?To test this theory, the team revisit the scenes of the murders in west London. They use contemporary policing techniques such as geographical and offender profiling to see if the crimes of Jones the boy can be measured against those of Jack the Stripper. And from the outset, it becomes apparent there are many chilling similarities.

Neil Milkins ● 2419d0 Comments ● 2419d

Why bother with "Consultations"?

....it seems they simply get ignored when the consulates do not give the right answers to the often loaded questions.We had this with the rather weird consultation for the BRS CPZ. Clearly engineered by policy makers and odd that no-one seems to know anyone who can fathom out why the pointless changes were implemented with such a tiny percentage of respondents.Again with a corrupted Consultation for cycleway CS6 which got rumbled. But his latest published result from TfL just shows the complete disregard for democracy and local people.We have a perverse situation whereby a social Berlin wall is to be imposed that will allow only the wealthier to drive between Chiswick and Brentford and at the same time reductions in bus services that will increase overcrowding in the bonkers belief that the great unwashed will walk or cycle.So when 70 % of a fairly high response get ignored, what is the point of wasting taxpayers money on such flimsy cover for inept political meddling?This from TfL:Dear Stakeholder Between 2 July and 12 August 2018, we consulted on proposals to change routes 27 and 440 in Chiswick. (We consulted separately on proposals to extend route 440 in Wembley). We received 607 responses to the consultation (including three responses from stakeholders). Thanks to all those who provided their views – we appreciate your patience in waiting for our reply. Of the 604 public responses, nine per cent supported or strongly supported the proposed changes to route 27, three per cent neither supported nor opposed them, 72 per cent opposed or strongly opposed them, three per cent did not use the route and 13 per cent did not answer.For the proposed changes to route 440, 14 per cent supported or strongly supported the proposals, 15 per cent neither supported nor opposed them, 14 per cent opposed or strongly opposed them, 43 per cent did not use the route and 14 per cent did not answer.We have reviewed all of the consultation responses and intend to proceed with the scheme as proposed in early 2019 with one alteration: instead of terminating at Hammersmith Grove, route 27 would terminate at a bus stand on Glenthorne Road currently used by rail replacement buses. The last and first stops would be at this location instead of at Hammersmith Grove. This is because the Hammersmith Grove stand has been removed as part of a local urban realm scheme.For more details including a full consultation report and our response to issues raised, please go to https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/routes-27-and-440/. Yours faithfully image002.jpgAndrew Hatch

Raymond Havelock ● 2469d19 Comments ● 2460d

TW8 Editors-Black Dog Beer House Article

Hi,I just wanted to clear up a couple of glaring inaccuracies within the article mentioning The Black Dog Beer House (formally The Albany Arms).I would have preferred to have been consulted by TW8 editors before they wrote this article......no one thought of calling  us to get a story?Firstly our company Twisted Grain Ltd is about a year old and not involved at all in revitalizing The Express Tavern.My other half and I helped setup The Sussex Arms in 2010,The Antelope & Big Smoke Brew co as a managment team working directly  for the owners of the respective pubs but our company has no relevance to your statement.The Black Dog Beer House is our first business independantly and we would like to be seen as this, not an offshoot of a company we no longer work for.We have of course applied to update and clean up the premises licence,however the proposed opening hours mentioned in this article bear so resemblence to our proposed Opening times.....which are in fact and will always be the followingMon-Thurs 12-11pmFri12-11.30pmSat 10-11.30pmSun 12-10.30pmAnd we definetly wont be having door supervisors on the doors,where did this nugget of knowedge spring from?Please get your facts straight before publishing articles about a new business opening. Even small inaccuracies can sometimes cause division,confusion and actually make our job of building a new business that much harder and stressfull.Maybe last week when you called me asking if we wanted to advertise on TW8 you may have thought it best to ask me then???And yes its late at the point of writing this.....I have been up since 5am working my butt off to get our first  business off the ground...so excuse the coarsness of my tone, but after reading your article Im just deflated by your poor researching.It really is terrible journalism even from a community site.Im speechless,why didnt you ask us first?RegardsPeter BrewThe Black Dog Beer House

Peter Brew ● 2502d21 Comments ● 2474d

The fight begins!

A Planning Inquiry is being held into the fate of allotments earmarked for development. The might of the estate of The Duke of Northumberland is being challenged by local amenity groups, allotment holders, residents and the local authority.  “It’s rather a David v Goliath situation” says Susan Casey, Chair of The Isleworth Society. “We are putting every effort into preventing a plan to bulldoze Park Road Allotment Gardens and concrete it over with privately rented flats and a few houses. The site is land that is the last vestige to survive in what traditionally was a market garden area. For centuries it has been enjoyed as a tranquil, greenfield open space and wildlife habitat”.The 9th Duke of Northumberland leased the land in 1917 to the Local Authority for allotments. It was at a time when the Government was urging landowners to provide growing spaces to give sustenance to returning First World War veterans following a disastrous harvest the year before leading to fears of starvation. The current, 12th Duke, has revoked the lease to take back the land.This has come about in a current environment where the need for allotment sites is increasing given the propensity to build flats bereft of gardens. The Duke’s Northumberland Estate is appealing against the Council’s decision to turn down the application to build on the site. None of the housing envisaged met the definition of “affordable”. A further plan is also being appealed on refusal to permit allotments within the nearby Grade l listed Syon Park designed in the late 18thC by the renowned landscape architect Capability Brown. If allowed the location earmarked beside the Robert Adam designed Lion Gates would destroy the intended pastoral openness and vistas both within and from outside the parkland. Prospective plot holders consider it unsuitable given severe restrictions which would be imposed, condition of the soil, and are unimpressed by the Syon Estate’s management of the current site.The Planning Inquiry to determine the outcome commences Tuesday 9th October at Brentford Free Church, Boston Manor Road. It is likely to run for eight days. The Isleworth Society, a small charity whose aims include preserving the unique character of the area, is lending full support to getting the refusal decisions upheld.   It is proving an expensive exercise but they are grateful to local people for contributing donations however small, which so far have mounted up to cover some costs.The Inquiry is open to the public to come along, hear the proceedings and if wished “have their say”.  Some already intend to do this in an effort to save allotments which provide wide habitat, health and mental health benefits to the community and a tranquil outlook for the Charlotte House Nursing home providing end of life care.  The aim also is to prevent substantive harm to the setting of the internationally recognised Syon House.Notes:i. Planning Applications: London Borough of Hounslow: 00707/E/P110 and 00707/E/P11ii. Inspectorate Appeal References: APP/F5540/W/17/3192092 & APP/F5540/W/17/319208iii. To build at Park Road Allotment Gardens, on designated Local Open Land, 8 blocks of 3-4 storey buildings to create 119 flats and 8 houses with car parking at basement and street level, and Form new allotment area with associated infrastructure within Grade 1 listed Syon Estate next to Grade l Listed Lion Gates on designated Metropolitan Open landiv. The Allotment site has Asset of Community Value status for which The Isleworth Society applied in October 2015. 30th December 2016 Judge Jacqueline Findlay dismissed the Northumberland Estate’s Appeal against this. The decision indicates the allotment land is a valuable asset which positively contributes to the local area and beyond and is valued by the community.  v. The Isleworth Society website : www.isleworthsociety.btck.co.ukContacts: Susan Casey, Chair, The Isleworth Society 07818436844 Christine Diwell, Secretary The Isleworth Society 020 8744 0663

Vanessa Smith ● 2508d1 Comments ● 2505d

Planet Hounslow

A neighbour and myself have been trying to assist some elderly neighbours who were promised that they would be moved from their 3 bed house to a sheltered unit nearby late last March. They were advised by housing officers to start packing up their home ready for the move  - since then nothing!The work on the sheltered unit to alter space originally used for staff has been waiting to be 'signed off' since April by building control who said they had some issues with health & safety. Since then an elderly couple, not in the best of health, have been left living out of boxes and virtually in one room with only a hotplate to cook on as they were told their cooker was unsafe. My neighbour and I have been in almost non-stop correspondence with two ward councillors since last month and recently also the cabinet member for housing - and all we are told is that officers in the housing department are 'looking into it'. Quite what they are 'looking into' no-one has said and why 'signing off' work should take over five months remains a mystery. What is so staggering is that these people were actually asked by the housing dept. some time ago if they'd like to downsize! They also have some maintenance issues - a wet room installed by Hounslow for instance, leaks out into their hall if they use it, when they report anything they get met with this response - they are told the work won't be done - 'as they are moving'. Why is it that between them three elected members can't get their act together and tell officers to get off their rear ends and do it speedily? The other stupid  part of this farce is that people desperate for family homes are being told - that 'they don't come up that often' - well they might if this shower bloody well showed some initiative, interest and spine. To leave elderly people in this mess for months on end because of sheer incompetence and lack of caring is an absolute disgrace.

Vanessa Smith ● 2516d10 Comments ● 2511d

Privatisation of Parks

From The Guardian:London's parks accused of 'creeping privatisation' of public spacesProliferation of music festivals and other events across capital’s green spaces means disruption and restrictions to access for residents Access to parks across London is being increasingly restricted by corporate events such as music festivals, a researcher has found, linking it to “creeping privatisation” of public space.Findings presented at the Royal Geographical Society’s annual conference on Friday show that, more than ever before, London parks are being rented out to private companies as councils seek to boost revenue to fund key services.Dr Andrew Smith, an urban geographer from the University of Westminster, studied the use of Finsbury Park, Gunnersbury Park and Brockwell Park and found councils were increasingly over-reliant on them as commercial assets.The end of parklife as we know it? The battle for Britain’s green spaces Read moreThe trend towards bigger and more frequent festivals in parks highlights the pressure councils are under to generate income under austerity, he said.“It’s for good reason – they’re desperately trying to find ways of making revenue, but it’s got to the point where we need to think about protecting parks from local authorities’ exploitation.”“If you live next to one of those parks, you not only lose the access for several weeks of the year, but you also endure the practical inconvenience, the noise and the trucks as well. It’s a double whammy.”The Cityscape: get the best of Guardian Cities delivered to you every week, with just-released data, features and on-the-groundGreenwich and Lewisham councils, who share Blackheath, each allow events to be held in the park for 90 days. With an extra seven days required by the London marathon, full public access to the heath can be restricted for up to 187 days – more than half the year.Smith cited figures to show that Battersea Park hosted approximately 99 events in 1991, compared with more than 600 by 2016. Brockwell Park was also hosting more events because Clapham Common was so often booked, he said.Simon Hunt, the chair of the Friends of Finsbury Park group, said that since the three-day Wireless festival was first staged there in 2014, the park had effectively become a “round-the-clock commercial venue”.“For the majority of the summer months, the park is no longer open, in the proper sense, to the community. It’s now reaching boiling point.”According to the group’s figures, it was occupied by festivals for 113 days (including setup and de-rigging) in the first nine months of 2018 – up from just 29 days in 2015.Sign up for the Cityscape: the best of Guardian Cities every week Read moreHaringey council figures put it at 66 days, noting that Wireless, the biggest festival, only put 27% of the park out of general use. A spokeswoman added that the events “bring in vital funds” and were attended by many residents.AdvertisementFriends of Finsbury Park opposed the relicensing of Wireless but Hunt said he did not expect them to be heard when the council issuing the license also stood to gain financially from holding the event.Intense commercial activity in the park over successive years had had far-reaching impacts, he said, including obvious degradation of the ground and birdwatchers reporting fewer sightings.Clapham Common has still not recovered from last year’s Winterville festival, according to the Open Spaces Society who are calling on Lambeth Council to disallow the event, which is held for six weeks in the run-up to Christmas.The ground of the common’s events area resembles “a muddy desert” eight months on from the last Winterville, said the society’s local correspondent Jeremy Clyne.Use of the area for events, coupled with long periods of closure to allow grass a chance to recover, is “resulting in the public being denied access on an almost permanent basis”, said the society.Lambeth Council has so far received 234 objections to the planning application for restaging Winterville festival this year, against 54 expressions of support. The Open Spaces Society said the council has refused to reveal how much it receives for allowing the event on grounds of commercial confidentiality.Smith said financial gain was being prioritised over community benefit. “You could link it to a creeping privatisation – it seems publicly palatable but the effect is just damaging,” he said.“A festival has this sort of friendly face, people do see them as public occasions, but they’re obviously only public occasions if you can afford to get in.”Over-reliance on parks as commercial assets also leaves councils vulnerable to funding shortfalls in the event of festivals being moved or cancelled, Smith said.Outside the capital, festivals are usually held on private land, but parks budgets are under threat across the UK. Bristol City council backtracked on its plan to cut its parks spending to zero after public outcry. Newcastle drew criticism for reducing its budget by 90% over seven years, before approving a proposal to set up an independent charitable trust to run the city’s parks and allotments last year.Simon said it reflected a widespread undervaluing of the benefits of green spaces, particularly in cities.“Parks are a great triumph of the British state that we should be looking after, because once it’s gone it’s gone. We’ve got to realise that parks are special, beyond any financial calculation of what they’re worth.”

Vanessa Smith ● 2545d10 Comments ● 2530d

Total destruction of rare birdlife and wildlife in Gunnersbury Park

Absolutely appalled to find that the Site for the recent events in Gunnersbury park was permitted in much of the area that contained some of the finest tree specimens in the  district and some of the rarest birdlife and wildlife..This was the former pitch and putt area and the fact that both golfing etiquette and bye-law rules prohibited dogs  and other items into the area kept this area pristine from little more than lost golf balls, for many decades.This has allowed the maintained but unadulterated ground to remain in very good condition. It was not uncommon to see what looked like snakes in the rough but were actually Brahminy Blind Snakes and Slow Worms and sometimes Lizards.  Going right back to summer holidays in the late 1970s, these were prized finds when playing pitch and putt.As were seeing woodpeckers, and all manner of not so common birds..But since the golf course was opened up to walkers and dogs, and the undergrowth turned to weeds and convolves the species have been scared and scavenged away. But the damage from noise, the overflowing of dozens of urinals and the compression of already dried and dusty ground has left the site now contaminated and damaged to such a degree, my RSPB director friend who showed me around says it will take up to 20 years for the site to recover and thats assuming it will never be disturbed in such a way again.  Nesting birds have left and the early mornings are now silent.So the pontificating hypocrite that is Julian Bell, who makes big claims about being an environmentalist, has managed to do more environmental damage in one weekend than aircraft and vehicles have managed in 50 years. I hope he and his acolytes and green supporters as well as our slightly less reckless representatives here will ask the right questions and get the right answers and explain how destroying the local ecology of a public park is justifiable for its fiscal upkeep?I cannot tell you how, in an era of endless 'concerns' about our environment this highlights what absolute double standards are being peddled out as a front for salaries for the incompetent clique whose noses are well in the trough. And Fake News? Press releases from local authorities ought to be the starting point for any clampdown and honest answers to questions rather than the same old cooked up spin.

Raymond Havelock ● 2577d15 Comments ● 2551d

Thames Trademans Rowing Club Eviction DM Chiswick

I am not privy to all the details of the case, but I am sharing this so you can read and decide for yourself whether to sign, as a gesture of support for the club. Here is the link to the petition and below is the text;https://www.change.org/p/steve-curran-hounslow-gov-uk-open-the-doors-and-let-thames-tradesmen-s-row? Hounslow council gave Thames Tradesmen's Rowing club just 4 weeks notice of eviction (with no prior discussion or advanced warning). This is because they plan to knock down the building and put a new one up. However, the council have no funds to do so and so this will not happen for another 2-3 years. Today, they locked the doors on Chiswick Boathouse, stopping Thames Tradesmen's from rowing for the first time in its proud 121 year history. The council are challenging the club's lease that runs until 2033, wanting the club to instead capitulate and sign a rolling 6 month licence. In effect they are saying, 'Unless you sign this license, you cannot row'. The club believes it is only fair and right in a democratic, legal based society that we are allowed to protect the long term survival of the club by holding onto our claim for a longer term lease that had been agreed by the council (and never before contested over the past 33 years). The club has therefore been forced to spend a past President's hard-earned legacy to seek legal clarification from the High court over the lease. The club asked the council last week to delay the eviction until this legal judgment had been heard. They refused. Today they again refused to even talk directly with the club representatives. We want to ask your help in petitioning the council to allow our club members to carry on doing what they love - row. Open the doors!

Bernard Allen ● 2555d9 Comments ● 2552d

recycling collections

I've had two occasions over recent months to complain about the recycling collections. Each time I receive a reply - here is the latest received this morning 3rd July,2018:Dear Mr Brownlee,Thank you for your email below which has been received by the waste and recycling team. I apologise for the delay in responding, we are currently receiving very high volumes of correspondence. I have checked our reporting system which shows your plastics container wasn’t sorted correctly on collection day according to the crew. Could you provide me with an image of the contents inside your plastics container to determine if this was the case? I have raised a behaviour complaint against the crew under SR00654559 and they will ensure this doesn’t happen again after future collections.Kind Regards,Jonathan FowlerBusiness Support officerEnvironmental Services & Contract ManagementREDe Regeneration, Economic Development & EnvironmentLondon Borough of HounslowOffice:  020 8583 5555Mr Fowler responds reasonably quickly - five days in this case - in answer to my complaint that my red box (for plastics and metal) was rejected without explanation, and the other boxes (green, blue and food waste) are thrown back empty(together with my next door neighbours),and haphazardly on my small front garden destroying plants and new seedlings and obstructing my pathway. A total of eight boxes scattered in front of my front door, pathway and small front garden. Yes-they actually throw my neighbours boxes with my own, because they can't be bothered to separate them - even though that's not how they found them!My complaint to Mr Fowler included the following observation: "This is quite disgraceful, and demonstrates a clear contemptuous behaviour by the collectors, and a shocking disregard and disrespect to the borough's residents and their property.If the council wishes to gain willing and harmonious cooperation from the public to expedite and assist their recycling efforts, one would assume they would ensure their collectors to be equally cooperative and socially sensitive when emptying and returning the boxes."Mr Fowler now asks for a photograph of the red box.Tomorrow is a new collection day, and I will be taking photographs of my boxes from now on. It is an absurd yet seemingly necessary thing to do now. We should all take pictures of our boxes now before collection. Mr Fowler could well be inundated with them.One big question I have - which I forgot to ask Mr Fowler - is if there is an offending item in a box, why can it not be returned uncollected, without having to reject everything else? It seems like a gross jobsworth officious punishment for what can only be a minor innocent offence! Perhaps one of our eminent local counsellors can answer this, for I fear Mr Fowler has his hands full.

Paul Brownlee ● 2603d0 Comments ● 2603d

Private, Council Tenants and Shareholders BEWARE - BRENTFORD DOCK Data Protection Act Breach

There was a serious data breach and breach of confidentiality by Brentford Dock that was discovered in court by victims (Brentford Dock residents) of serious crimes, the illegally obtained information was disclosed by the defendant’s barrister in court.  The defendant (a Brentford Dock resident) was found guilty as charged of hate crimes.  Private and confidential information was revealed in court during the defense barristers questioning of the victims that could only have come from the Brentford Dock office or directors of the company. Veronica Wray Brentford Dock Ltd chairman acknowledged the data breach.  Brentford Dock is still refusing to let the victims know the full extent of the data breach.   A complaint was made to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and they stated that Brentford Dock did disclose personal information in breach of the Data Protection Act (DPA). The victims of crime put in a Subject Access Request (SAR) to Brentford Dock to establish what information Brentford Dock Ltd had of theirs.  This SAR provided by Brentford Dock’s lawyers Jordans Corporate Law was late and in breach of the DPA as stipulated by the ICO.  Although the ICO stated it was “likely” that Brentford Dock provided all the data to which the victims of crime were entitled, the victims know that was not the case and is an untrue statement.   The victims being tenants like a large number of residents residing on the Brentford Dock Estate give substantial private and confidential information to the management office operated by Michael Richards & Co. For example Contact details for emergency purposes i.e. names, addresses, telephone numbers were given to the office in compliance with the Tenant and Resident’s Hand Books.  Furthermore, the victims also own a car for which they obtained a parking permit, in order to park on the private road on the estate.  For this Parking permit residents have to provide to Brentford Dock and Michael Richards & Co: name, address, telephone numbers, email addresses, details of vehicle registration, make model, company car Yes/No.  Proof of Residency (e.g. service charge invoice, tenancy agreement or similar). “Proof of keepership of Vehicle(s) (photo copy of Registration Documents).  Or if a Company Vehicle, a letter from the company is required”.  This was all provided by the victims and was not done via any landlord.  Managing agents or landlords of the property being rented are also required to provide tenancy data to the Brentford Dock management office on change of tenancy.  In a response by Brentford Dock via lawyers, Jordans Corporate Law stated that they do not hold such information, e.g. telephone numbers, car details, tenancy agreement.  Jordans Corporate Law also wrote that “BDL would not be expected to hold such information”.  The ICO were told by Jordans Corporate Law, “Jordans has explained that you have requested information that Brentford Dock does not hold and in the course of its business would not be expected to hold or collect”.  The resident’s officer called the victims on telephone numbers which he, his office and Brentford Dock claim not to collect or hold after this was all written by their lawyers.  Furthermore, according to Jordans Corporate Law, Brentford Dock has managed to produce an electronic archive “that would need to engage a technical specialist to reformat the documents before commencing any searches…. It would be a disproportionate effort having regard to the expense of engaging a specialist…” The victims doubt the full truthfulness of this statement, as it would imply deception or incompetence or both on behalf of the whole Brentford Dock board.  The person in charge of the archiving claims 30 years of such experience and was assisted by librarian students from West Thames College on work experience who she supervised. Within the Brentford Dock office there is an office manager (data processor for Brentford Dock) whose qualifications have been questioned and for which no satisfactory answer has been forthcoming from Brentford Dock.  The office manager’s employer and the manager himself have not answered the questions put to them.  This could only lead to an adverse inference.One has to question whether anybody’s data is safe at Brentford Dock. More can be found at Brentforddockresidents.com

Mike Graham ● 2607d0 Comments ● 2607d

Opposition to Heathrow expansion

The government are saying that expansion will be “delivered within existing climate change and air quality obligations”. However, in Feb 2018 the High Courts ruled that the government’s current policy on air pollution was ‘unlawful’ and ordered changes. The UK government were slammed by the courts for failing to produce an adequate plan to tackle the growing problem of air pollution in a landmark judgment that will force ministers back to the drawing board in their efforts to clean up dirty urban air.As a result of the judgment, clean air in the UK will now be overseen by the courts, rather than ministers, in a “wholly exceptional” ruling in which the government was roundly defeated.Until the final UK Clean Air Strategy and detailed National Air Pollution Control Programme which is due to be published by March 2019, we cannot know what future guidelines will have to be met.‘’The burden of air pollution on the health of those living and working in Hounslow is significant, being linked with over 100 deaths annually’’ - Hounslow’s Air Quality Action Plan 04/05/2017So it's about time LBH got off the fence and not only supported Ruth Cadbury our MP, but the Labour party, the Mayor of London, Greenpeace and other local authorities Hillingdon, Richmond-upon-Thames, Wandsworth and Hammersmith & Fulham, who collectively are making a stand and planning legal action against expansion. Stop thinking about votes LBH and think about the people who elected you, this is about lives not jobs!

Martin Case ● 2610d20 Comments ● 2608d

Yulin Dog Meat Festival

I'm an author from Brentford and one thing I love about this small town is the fact it's filled with dog lovers. St Paul's is always filled with friendly dog owners and their hounds (apart from the odd shady character!) and that's why I'm hoping that some of our community will be willing to take part in a campaign I am running called Operation Hound.I'm quite sure that the majority of people reading this will have heard of the Yulin Dog Meat Festival in China where each year thousands of dogs - many stolen pets - are skinned, boiled and burned alive. This actually occurs every day of the year in China as millions of dogs are subjected to the same fate on a daily basis. We - and our dogs - are very fortunate to live in a country where dog welfare is a priority - doggy heaven, as many call it. The same cannot be said of the poor dogs and their grieving owners in China, where animal welfare laws are non-existent. The campaign I'm running has several thousand people participating throughout the globe and I would love for some local dog lovers to get on board. Even if you are not a dog lover, your help would be much appreciated; anyone who objects to such extreme torture and cruelty is rightly outraged by this. We are currently spreading awareness about the "cultural myth" in China - there is widespread misinformation that the DMT is cultural; it is not. For almost 300 years when the Qing Dynasty reigned in China, the killing and consumption of dog was forbidden. It was only in 1912 when the KMT nationalist party got to power that dogs began being subjected to nationwide torture, as the KMT hated the Qing and would boil dogs alive before political meetings just to spite them. Mao's communist regime further inflamed cruelty to dogs with many being exterminated, and this terrible torture and cruelty continues to this day. Millions of Chinese people want the trade to end, but their government won't listen to them. That's why it's so important that we who live in democratic nations use our power and voice to help them, by urging our own governments to apply pressure on President Xi. Currently, we are working with Americans as the USA has legislation underway which could potentially see the US government openly objecting to the dog meat trade; if this legislation is a success, it could be explosive, producing a domino effect throughout the world.Will you help us? I don't believe that the worth of a dog's life depends on what side of the border it is on. There is absolutely nowhere else in the world where dogs are subjected to such horrific cruelty, and on such a grand scale, which is accepted, even sometimes encouraged, by their government. If you are willing to help, please join Operation Hound! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1954614731419993/

Sarah Antoinette ● 2616d3 Comments ● 2615d

Memorial Service.

On Saturday 4 August 2018 at 2.00pm, a memorial service is being held in the Metropole Theatre, Abertillery, South Wales for two Abertillery murder victims, 8 year-old Freda Burnell and 11 year-old Florence Little who were killed in Abertillery in 1921.Their killer, Harold Jones a.k.a Harry Stevens lived in Fulham, Putney and Hammersmith between 1946 and 1971 when he died. With a choir and town band performing at the memorial service there is expected to be over 250 people attending. There will be an expected 50 members of the 2 girls' family members attending from various parts of Britain. After the service there will be a re-dedication of the 2 girls' memorials at Brynithel Cemetery.Over the past 7 months, myself, Councillors Gill Clark and Julie Holt have raised nearly £3,400.00 towards the cost of restoring the 2 dilapidated memorials. We are still about £200 short of paying the memorial mason who has done the work at cost price and about £300 short of printing 260 memorial service programmes. These will consist of 8 pages each.We have now been given a donation to book the Metropole Theatre for the event. We  have also been kindly offered a donation of £300 towards the cost a buffet that will be held in the Metropole later in the afternoon.If anyone would like to consider making a donation for this worthy cause please contact me on 07989555376 or n.milkin@sky.comPlease google Florence Little/Freda Burnell  or Harold Jones - Killer for more information.Regards.Neil Milkins

Neil Milkins ● 2628d0 Comments ● 2628d

Hurray for Community Planting Schemes!

"GARDENS:  National Gardens Scheme/Ealing in Bloom Do you need inspiration?I happened upon a National Gardens Scheme (ngs) open garden when working in Hammersmith the other day and managed to grab a look.  It was inspirational - it was probably about 5m x 2 and a half.  Enough space to sit outside the kitchen on a bench and have a cup of coffee and enjoy the plants in front of you and growing up the walls/fence. A peaceful little green oasis away from the grey hard surfaced pavements and busy A4.  It had grass in the middle - not a lot but real grass proving that you don't have to turn any small garden into a patio.  I wished I'd had more time...  there were quite a few other gardens in the area which were open with the proceeds going to the charities that the ngs support.https://www.ngs.org.uk/(and apparently there is also tea and cake)Ealing in BloomNow I have heard of this but see fewer and fewer posters around.  The deadline for entering your garden, patio etc is 8th June.  You have to email or go to the library to get a form.https://www.ealingallotmentspartnership.co.uk/images/ealing-in-bloom/ealing-in-Bloom-2018-Poster.pdfPlease don't believe that it is so much easier to have a patio and pots because so many plants - if you choose the right ones ie not just the ones you fancy - will grow far better and will be less effort and less demanding growing in a garden than pots where you have to constantly keep on watering and feeding.  Have a look at the shrubs which grow well in gardens around you - and give a neighbour a hand when they become less mobile - please!  It will not only make our streets a lot more pleasant but will be good for the well-being of many."I posted the above on 4 June as a result of not being brave enough to knock on a door and offer to cut back a fuchsia which I think now had suffered as a result of the Beast from the East.  It was alive but had a lot of dead wood. I don't know the person/people who live there - if I had done I would have without question.The garden has now been cleared and left with just gravel instead of any of the beautiful fuchsia which I had enjoyed as I walked past year after year. Sadly I'm too late :(With a bit of TLC I'm sure we could all still be enjoying that fuschia.  They generally tend to be pretty hardy - especially once they have become established.  It is the second very small garden that has gone that way in the last couple of months.So it is wonderful what has been happening in Brentford - community planting to make an area look so much better - which in turn tends to encourage people to take pride in their neighbourhood and keep it looking better:http://www.brentfordtw8.com/default.asp?section=info&page=airquality020.htm 

Philippa Bond ● 2629d3 Comments ● 2629d

Air pollution – local councils are to solve the problems

From yesterday's the Independent newspaper, 'Government’s 'inadequate' air pollution strategy fails to tackle car and lorry emissions'Air pollution in Brentford exceeds legal limits on an almost continuous basis:https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1Pm56n7vrZ675k1H-J68dVhXyTbEAir pollution causes around 40,000 early deaths every year in Britain, according to the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.Radio 4 yesterday noted that the onus to tackle the problem is firmly in the arena of Local Councils, which have the following legislation that they should be applying:The Environment Act 1995, which requires local authorities to monitor air pollution against national targets and to take action where it is found that these targets are unlikely to be met. (note the TAKE ACTION part of that, which I've capitalised)Carry out roadside vehicle emissions checks in AQMAs and issue fixed fines to drivers whose vehicles do not comply with emissions limits.Make Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) to regulate traffic. For example, a local authority can impose a TRO to restrict the amount and type of traffic in busy areas. The Clean Air Act 1993, which gives local authorities the powers to control and deal with dark smoke and harmful fumes.So, the questions are:Air pollution in Brentford is killing local citizens and the Council have been empowered to control and prevent it.  What are they doing???  Incidentally, I worked out the air pollution here is equivalent to us all smoking a pack of fags a day, children etc included.Why are there no roadside vehicle emission checks?  We all see cars, vans, lorries and buses that are clearly exceeding the emissions requirements belching out their black smoke as they drive through Brentford, along the A4 or over the M4.  Curtailing these offenders is low hanging fruit that will have a significant effect of the air we breathe.  The council can’t claim insufficient funds as they have a surplus equivalent to a years council tax from all of us sitting in their bank account. Applying fines also means it could be more profitable than that high revenue speed camera they've stuck on the north circular.  The only insufficient things appear to be brain power, willpower and back-bone.Regulate traffic.  Well, there’s a toxic sewer of pollution running right through the centre of our town.  And again, the solution appears to be sitting there, backed up by legislation and just waiting to be used.And the stick that can be applied to force our Local Council to do the right thing:Legislation, maladministration, taking them to court.  The fiasco with hopelessly inappropriate building developments led me to investigate and instigate the initial stage of maladministration.  Interesting reaction, from which I’ve learned the behaviour patterns.

Lorne Gifford ● 2645d13 Comments ● 2640d

Shameful behaviour of a candidate

Purposely didn't post this until after 10pm but I was very unimpressed with a Brentford Conservative candidate today.  I was outside within our development with a couple of fellow residents and our concierge when two individuals carrying a plethora of leaflets wandered past us (already on private land) into what was to them a dead end because beyond us was only a fob controlled access into a private residential block.I politely pointed out to them that they couldn't get in the building to drop off leaflets, and then the silly talk began.  Who am I ?.  Was I Labour ?.  Was I obstructing them ?.  No, we're not trying to leaflet, we're just going over there to where the door is.  Err, I'm a resident, this is our concierge, no I'm not Labour, you're on private land and I'm politely pointing out that behind us is a dead end apart from a door you can't enter, so your efforts might be more fruitful elsewhere.Apparently this individual is (a) going to report me to Hounslow Counncil, for quite what I've no idea, and (b) as of 18.30 tonight was a Brentford Councillor, which was news for me given there's current Brentford Conservative Councillors for this ward.So in the space of a couple of minutes said candidate trespassed, was aggressive towards four potential constituents, and lied about being a Councillor.Needless to say he didn't get my vote, and if that's how a candidate thinks its acceptable to behave, I hope he didn't get yours.

Adam Beamish ● 2664d16 Comments ● 2652d

Park Road Allotments

Last year Northumberland Estates filed a planning application to build 127 homes on the Allotments at Park Road. Hounslow Planning Committee rejected the proposals for the development despite the Council’s planning officers recommending approval.Northumberland Estates have filed an appeal with the planning inspectorate. The Isleworth society has been granted Rule 6 status for the purposes of the hearing and will take the lead on opposing the application with the aid of barrister representation.Hounslow Liberal Democrats were collecting signatures for a petition opposing the development last weekend at a farmers and gardeners market in South Street, Isleworth.The Libdem petition calls on Hounslow Council to comply with its statutory obligation to provide adequate allotment plots in the borough and to this end, to investigate the feasibility of an application for compulsory hiring of the Park Road Allotment Gardens Isleworth, in accordance with the provisions of the Small Holdings and Allotments Act 1908.Charles Rees, a retired Barrister and Liberal Democrat candidate for Homefields Ward in Chiswick said “Hounslow Council have the power if they wish to exercise it under s.39 of the 1908 Act together with Schedule Part II of the 1908 Act, Provisions for Compulsory Hiring of Land by Councils. These parts of the 1908 Act are still extant. Hounslow Council is a competent authority to exercise these powers under the Act by virtue of being a borough council. The Smallholdings Allotment (compulsory Hiring) Regulations 1936 also apply; they deal with the procedures involved in a Council compulsorily hiring the land for allotments.”The Petition is available online at https://hounslowlibdems.org.uk/en/petition/park-road-allotments-petition Please do support this community wide campaign to preserve the allotments

Joseph Gerald Bourke ● 2667d1 Comments ● 2667d

Just a typical 10 minute walk in our area...

I meant to write this the other evening as in a depressing kind of way I found the experience of my 8 minute walk from home to McDonalds and back at 7pm on Saturday evening rather 'funny'...I walked out the side gate from Holland Gardens into Chapel Lane, and I can't fail to hear a woman repeatedly shouting obscenities at someone else in the flat she lives in (with the windows wide open) within the Shepherds Bush managed building opposite ours.I then walk past the Travelodge into North Drive, noting that as usual there's cars with no disabled badges on parked in the disabled bays.  Theres's also kids lobbing the little bags of coffee, sugar etc. from one of the rooms at pedestrians, and trying to engage said pedestrians in 'dialogue' from the safety of their upper floor room.  I ignore their attempts to engage with me because I know they hope I'll react to their goading, and knowing if I do engage I'll end up having a protracted discussion with the poor sod on the Travelodge front desk as I demand their eviction from the room/premises.Between North Drive and Pottery Road I note the abandoned buggy that was in the middle of the pavement has been removed.  I can't fail to hear however how the clanking manhole that has been clanking for months near Watermans is still clanking away, leaving me to ponder why no-one has bothered to get it sorted.I turn to enter McDonalds, but I can't get in the building because there's 4 mopeds and their riders parked right outside the entrance collecting food delivery orders, thereby narrowing the pedestrian flow into at best one way only.  I recall how the other week a group of kids aged between 10-17 had left their bikes in the doorway but none of the staff said a word, probably out of intimidation given how in their dialogue to one another these kids were effing away regardless of the elderly and young children around.I get in the building and I can't get to the order point because a mother is just randomly standing there with a pushchair and 3 children in the worst position she could stand whilst another of her brood tries to order something, and she shows no interest or inclination in moving.I walk out afew minutes later, and walking home I humour myself by thinking about how people say Brentford is brilliant whereas I feel like the last few minutes have been like the f**king third world (the language reflects my precise thoughts at the time).

Adam Beamish ● 2681d97 Comments ● 2669d

Jezzas Cronies

Dear NeighboursI was fast asleep tonight after a long day at work. I was awoken by the door bell and on answering the door was confronted by a member of Jezzas Cronies.I am she said , stop there i said, I am not of your persuasion. Thankfully she got the message and left. Now awake I thought we never see you people and by that I mean any of the political parties until you want our votes to help feather your own nests.So I cannot recommend who to vote for but I can recommend who not too. As on the 3rd of May we have the chance to rid ourselves of one of the most incompetent ,inept and arrogant bunch ever to be let loose on the residents of this borough.These are the people who saved the plastics industry by purchasing tens of thousand ofwheelie bins and plastic  ryclling bins and in doing so changed the streets of Brentford the brighter borough into a mass open air recycling centre.These are the people who have managed sub contract out the maintenance of our roads and highways to a French owned company at a cost to us of tens of millions of pounds. You might find this surprising given the state of the footpaths many of which are more dangerous than a First World War battlefield.    Or perhaps like me you have wondered if they are repairing the Tesco car park at Gillette corner as it is always full up with Hounslow Highways vehiclesHow many times do our council members and now The Dear Leader have to jet off to the south of France to quaff champagne with property developers on the excuse of this will help the redevelopment of Brentford. After all I thought did no our sitting MP do that when she was a councillor one  look at the high street shows how successful that was.Then of course golden goodbyes we pay £302.000 redundancy  to a Council employee who was Director Regenartion and development not bad for five years. We wish him well in his new role with Wilmott  Dixon a prime mover in the Brentford stadium development Then of course we had Hounslow Homes scandle which cost us millions no one charged and no money back. You could not make it up, there record in local government is crap and they have the bloody cheek to knock on people's doors  to ask for more time to keep snouts in the trough So dear Neighbours, if you are gluttons for more punishment Jezzas Cronies are the ones for you . They will certainly deliver,for themselves and there mates.PS Bet there glad they knocked on my door now and woke me up

Robert Ayres ● 2680d16 Comments ● 2670d

Many a Concern is raised by Press Release re Recycling

I was more than a tad concerned about the tone and content of Hounslow's press release about recycling which was posted today on the front page of the TW8 site.The unfortunate tone of the missive is typified by the threat to the person who has been sticking labels onto public bins which are officially labelled in a manner that deceives the public. In a similar vein, without presenting any evidence, Joe and Jane Public are blamed for using street bins for the disposal of domestic waste. Is this another offence and is it also punishable with a Fixed Penalty Notice and/or prosecution? What exactly is this domestic waste and how does the disposal of waste in street bins add to the problem of rubbish in the street? Perhaps many households have inappropriate or insufficient facilities or perhaps we are taking greater care not to throw waste on to our streets? (I very much doubt the latter but Hounslow Highways deserve our great appreciation for the speed with which they respond to incidents of fly-tipping.)I have no idea of the cost of the new waste and recycling depot at Southall Lane but it must have been a very significant investment. The fact that it is "state of the art" does not in itself mean that it represents the best use of resources. Is 16,000 tonnes of recycled waste a significant amount? What would be the implications of the introduction of a successful deposit scheme for plastic and glass bottles? Other statistics in the press release are almost meaningless when they are presented without any context. For example, we are told that the new scheme was rolled out to 75,000 households but from another part of the Hounslow website we learn that in 2017 there were about 95,000 households in Hounslow. This suggests that just over 20% of households have no, or minimal, recycling facilities.The recycling rate apparently increased from 29.8% in 2016/2017 to 33.2% in September 2017. With such a large investment we should jolly well hope for an improvement but statistics for a single month cannot be compared with those for an entire financial year.Statistics on recycling appear to vary from one source to another. For example Letsrecycle.com has Hounslow's rate for 2016/17 as 30.1%. What appears to be clear is that Hounslow's performance in that year was significantly worse than in any of our neighbouring London Boroughs with the single exception of Hammersmith and Fulham (23.2%). In 2016/17 Ealing appears to have achieved a rate of 50.7%, Hillingdon 43.4% and Richmond 42.4%. There are many social and geographical reasons for these variations but it would certainly appear that all is not well in the state of Hounslow. Who now believes that we will achieve the target of 50% by 2020?Our own household has been almost obsessive in its recycling efforts for many years but we have now concluded that a much more logical and effective approach is to reduce consumption and, where this is impossible, to re-use before recycling.            

Jim Storrar ● 2699d6 Comments ● 2692d

Heathrow noise & safety

In case anyone wants to complain about being woken up in the wee small hours by some snot nosed pilot juggling his throttles on approach, the email addresses are noise@heathrow.com and communityschemes@heathrow.com.  And since I was woken up early today and therefore am in a grumpy old combative mood, here’s an email I’ve sent. I added on the safety question as I’ve been meaning to ask it for a while now.Dear SirThere only appears to be these two emails on your website to send an email to.  My noise issue below is clearly going to the correct department, but perhaps you can forward my safety one to the relevant manager.Noise:What exactly was 04:42 hrs flight that passed over Kew/Brentford up to this morning?  It was sufficiently loud that it woke me up, despite double glazing and closed windows.  Was it one of those Russian built planes that don't have proper engines, or just someone playing with the throttles?Once awake of course, I then heard the 04:44, 04:47, 04:54, etc 'heavies' coming in from their overnight transcontinental flights.Within the reports downloadable on your website, you note that noisy aircraft at night are fined £4000 per decibel.  Given that you took 1 hour of my sleep, which has made me a little tired and grumpy at work today, can you please compensate me from this fund.Safety:I couldn't find anything in your documentation that puts a quantitative risk figure on the annual chance that an aircraft doesn't make it to the runway and instead lands through the houses or towns on the approach.  Can you direct me to the risk analysis report, which I am sure you keep regularly up to date, and am equally sure is available under freedom of information.I ask because there appear to have been quite a few instances of 'fuel emergencies', with aircraft coming in on fumes and not being able to line up in the landing pattern. Indeed, I was on one of these a few years back; commenting to my BA pilot neighbour that a long-haul flight I'd been on had come straight in and landed on a Friday evening, he suggested it had probably been about to run out of gas.  We all know about the Concorde that ran out of fuel whilst taxiing to its gate, and the flight that just cleared the perimeter fence before ploughing through the grass verge of the runways, so there's been enough for you to calculate the annual probability that one doesn't make the airport.Similarly, the Russian flight this week that dropped its cargo on take-off, the 747 that took off from Schipol and flew into a block of flats (I was living close to it at the time so remember that one well), the Concorde from Charles De Gaul, and numerous other take off incidents, have allowed quantified risk probabilities to be calculated for all airports for crashes into populated areas on take-off and landing.I'd like to know what the risks at Heathrow are, both for landing and take-off with respect to fatality numbers and property destruction.  Specifically, I'd like to know the calculated return period for third party fatalities.I hope you can help on the above two topics With kind regards

Lorne Gifford ● 2713d1 Comments ● 2707d

Is the Ballymore development past its best before date?

With news today of yet more High Street retailers heading towards collapse including more bastions of British Retail a sign that the Brentford Development is a disaster waiting to happen?The anticipated High rents, rates and expectations of blue chip retailers coming to Brentford must now be nothing more than a rose tinted pipe dream.Developments with limited parking, lack of infrastructure, a lunatic decision to move an arts centre in a unique position with no more than a bunch of trustees with very little idea how to achieve viability, overdensificaction and not a single infrastructure improvement or protection of existing open spaces and facilities for elderly, health or recreation, inability to maintain what exists are hardly going to make this an attractive area.So should the plans for the development not be reviewed with urgency to incorporate facilities and housing for older citizens, better infrastructure and flexibility to counter the massive reduction in retail and catering businesses.?It's been looking dodgy for a while now but the shrinkage in retail is far more sever and rapid.Government needs to sort out the debacle of business rates permanently. As with the Morrisons site, the initial approval for a massively risky and damaging proposal, ( recommended by LBH planning ) is indicative of the recklessness playing into the hands of developers has become and the willingness of LBH elected representatives and officers to cosy up to such types in places like Cannes really ought to be fully investigated.

Raymond Havelock ● 2710d0 Comments ● 2710d

Hounslow's planners make 'Private Eye' yet again.

Just who do Hounslow council pay any attention to?In this latest 'Eye' Nooks and Corners column Hounslow are heavily criticised for approving a development called Albany Riverside on the old Watermans site. These will be'significantly higher' than existing buildings which are 'largely screened from view to anyone standing in Kew Gardens'.'Historic England says the buildings, the tallest of which will be seven storeys, will cause multiple instances of harm to the setting. In a letter to planners they show how the new buildings will clutter the backdrop to the palace. At present, their letter explains "the parkland and historic buildings are framed by trees and sky alone. The whole effect is picturesque, humane and has taken centuries to develop". This goes on to say "This clearly harms the experience of visitors to Kew and obscures the Arcadian qualities that are a defining feature of the environment".The Chiswick Curve turned down by Hounslow is due to go to appeal in June. apprently Historic England 'have warned Hounslow planners that allowing Albany Riverside would set an "uncontrollable precedent for further new buildings within the hinterland of the world heritage site." I just wonder how a member of the planning committee one Cllr. Lambert thinks supporting closing 'picturesque' Church St.  which in the great scheme of things is pretty small beer squares with this decision which will impinge on such an important national and international heritage site?

Vanessa Smith ● 2718d28 Comments ● 2714d

Will local Labour consult its own members?

I see local Labour will be holding a "local manifesto consultation" at the Civic Centre on Monday to thrash out the policy platform on which it will be fighting this year's local elections.According to its Facebook page, Momentum Hounslow is petitioning for the adoption of a radical manifesto which, after all, would only bring it into line with the national party and the manifesto with which it fought the general election last year.We know the attitude this lot take towards consultation with ordinary residents but will they, I wonder, be any more inclined to listen to their own grass roots members?  Or will they treat them will the same contempt as they show to the rest of us?I reproduce below the full wording of the petition, purely in the interests of debate:Commit to an anti-austerity manifesto in line with Labour’s 2017 national manifesto*  For a no-cuts Hounslow Labour budget*  Council houses for Hounslow’s people, not private build for developers’ profits*  State schools, not faith schools or academiesWe call on  Hounslow Labour group councillors to Commit to an anti-austerity manifesto in line with Labour’s 2017 national manifestoTo support Hounslow’s people, with distinct policies from the Tories’ austerity agenda, we call on Labour councillors to support the following pledges for the 2018 Local Government Elections.*  A no-cuts budget *  Stop privatisation of services and bring contracts back in house where possible*  Withdraw pledge not to increase council tax. Consider alternative options, including raising it by up to 6%, or a progressive tax, where those in higher value properties see a larger increaseSpecific policy commitments to include:Housing*  All homes built on council-owned land to be council houses, using Public Works Borrowing Board funds up to the max Housing Revenue limit*  Freeze council rents, stop evictions related to rent arrears.*  Use CPOs or Empty Dwelling Management Orders to acquire properties that have been empty over the long term*  Double council tax on empty properties*  Provide shelters for rough sleepersSocial Care*  Restore carers, meals on wheels and home help*  Re open day care centres that have been closed over the past 8 years*  Bring service contracts back in house, paying London Living WageHeathrow*  Make clear Labour’s opposition to third runway in our public campaigning*  Join the anti-third runway campaign Local Council NetworkEducation*  Build new state schools as annexes to existing schools, as an alternative to faith and academy schools *  Restore Youth Centre funding and re-open those which have been closed over the past 8 years

Phil Andrews ● 2718d21 Comments ● 2715d

Duke of Northumberland appealing planning committee decision

HELP STOP DEVELOPMENT OF PARK ROAD ISLEWORTH ALLOTMENTS.The Northumberland Estate has appealed against LBofH’s refusal of the planning applications to build on Park Road allotment site and relocate allotments within Grade 1 Syon Park.  It is important local views expressed previously are demonstrated to the Inspector who will head the Public Enquiry that will take place in a few months’ time as a result of these appeals. If you have not already commented on one or both planning applications or wish to add to previous comments made, these must be received by 5th March 2018 at the latest.   They should be sent by letter in triplicate to:The Planning Inspectorate, 310(K) Eagle, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Bristol,BS1 6PN quoting the relevant reference number. Comments should be planning related.  Details of the application/appeal can be found on LBofH’s website under the planning ref. numbers.   Suggestions of the kind of objections you may wish to include for one or both applications are given below.  Please encourage others also to comment. Appeal Ref: APP/F5540/W/3192092 (planning ref. 00707/E/P110)Erection of 127 flats/houses in eight 3-4 storey blocks on Park Road Allotment GardensReasons for objecting to the proposed build:-Loss of designed Local Open Space, contrary to Hounslow’s Local Plan stating “there is little room for new development and this is reflected in the planning approach which focuses on safeguarding and promoting the established character”.The site is unsuited to the size, density, and massing of what is proposed which constitutes an over-development.The development is inappropriate and will erode the diversity and unique characteristics of the Conservation Area.Development will destroy a wildlife haven and biodiverse habitat.Asset of Community Value has not been taken into account.The proposed re-location of the allotments will not provide equivalent provision.Projected additional vehicle trips are an under-estimate and take no account of existing traffic congestion on Twickenham Road and the Park Road/London Road/Twickenham Road junction.The development will increase the flood risk of the area.None of the properties proposed meet with planning guidance definitions for affordable housing. Appeal Ref: APP/F5540/W/17/3192086 (planning ref: 0707/E/P111)Formation of new allotments within the Grade 1 Syon Estate landscapeReasons for objecting to the proposed allotment re-location:-Inappropriate position failing to preserve or enhance the historic character of the Grade 1 listed estate, Capability Brown designed landscape and Robert Adam designed Lion Gates.Inappropriate design, size and scale providing a net loss of allotment space and facilities.Unacceptable to permit the proposal because of the large extent of existing developments already permitted within the Estate which contribute to its restoration.The allotment structure would harm the openness and visual amenity of the landscape which is designated as Metropolitan Open Land.It will destroy the grassland habitat and any new arising will take years to develop.  Some species will be lost forever

Vanessa Smith ● 2734d0 Comments ● 2734d

Is deferring CS9 till after the election a bit of an avoidance?

As a cyclist of decades, I've yearned for cycleways since being a kid.Somehow, I've cycled for decades with very few skirmishes. Took the Cycling proficiency test at 12, a more recent urban update course in Camden. Now we have cycleways, I find my self rather strangely, going out of my way to avoid them.They have become racetracks and dominated by cyclists who seem to lose all sense of sensibility when on their machine.  No mudguards so they soak the rider behind, no bell or horn, no hand signals, no acknowledging other traffic, no courtesy shown even to other cyclists on 'inferior' machines. In all, no discipline.Yet these riders, devoid of road safety basics manage to have cameras, but can't afford a bell?We cycle more abroad in flat countries. The mentality is completely different and it is still a pleasure, especially as we get a bit slower with joints and muscles beginning to show the inevitable signs of getting older.So why is this?  Well I have not been impressed by the CS9 plan. So wanted to get involved in getting a better set of options.I found out pretty soon that open debate is not on the cards. Having visited a meeting of the Hounslow Cycling Campaign I was truly disheartened. First few were really nice people. But it became very apparent that they are not welcoming at all to anyone who dares to not agree with them. They have a very closed mindset. And do not seem very open to anything other than their own views and attitudes. Far too anti anything other than cycling.So now we hear it's not going anywhere until after the election.So are the council running away from this? Or the Hounslow Cycling Campaign? Or the electorate?  Or are they hoping to push this through in the usual clandestine way post election?As for the Hounslow Cycling Campaign, Just who are they?  I now know they certainly don't fit the bill to represent me as a local cyclist. I doubt I am alone on this.But a look at their website shows no names, no organisers, no details of who funds them nor if anyone funds them at all. No membership specifics and an assumption that to join them, that you therefore fully support CS9 in all it's glory.They have an opportunity, to stand for election fielding a candidate or two which might indicate the level of support, or to ensure that they are clearly on parties manifestos for the coming election.There is clearly a debate for CS9 and a need for better solutions that suit All cyclists and All other road users, pedestrians as well.So should it not be an election debate with a clear stance?  And names to those who claim to represent ?

Raymond Havelock ● 2771d17 Comments ● 2765d

Mogden Expansion ?

Browsing through the latest Heathrow consultation stuff, I was surprised to come across"As shown in Figure 227, the majority of Heathrow’s wastewater, fromthe T5, CTA, east side and Northern Apron Zone (NAZ) catchments, isdischarged to the Bath Road Sewer to the north of the existing airportcampus. The remainder, from the cargo and T4 catchments, is discharged toa sewer south of the airport. Both sewers convey flows to Mogden WWTW.Thames Water have advised that that the Bath Road Sewer is currentlyoperating at its full capacity, and consequently no additional flows can bedirected to it unless measures are taken to reduce the current demand orincrease the capacity. Mogden WWTW is also at its maximum capacity andis unable to treat additional wastewater flows without an upgrade to theexisting treatment facilities."and"Any increase in capacity will involve investment in new treatment and network infrastructure and the upgrade of existing facilities. Following engagement with Thames Water and development of other components, three options for providing the additional wastewater treatment capacity required for the expanded airport were identified:• Option 1: Upgrade the existing treatment facilities at Mogden WWTW in west London;• Option 2: Upgrade the existing treatment facilities local to the airport and divert some or all flows to this treatment location;• Option 3: Construct a new WWTW local to the airport to treat some, or all the flows from the expanded airport and surrounding communities.The final solution could also involve a combination of these options. Options 1 & 2 are reliant on feasibility study and evaluation by Thames Water. Heathrow will continue to work closely with Thames Water to develop these options."They have a couple of sites in mind for the new Option 3 sewage works - one near Harmondsworth or another on Mayfield Farm close to Bedfont Lakes (though that site has also been suggested as a possibility for the replacement Immigration Removal Centre)

Tim Henderson ● 2767d0 Comments ● 2767d

Friends' Groups Say Future of Borough Parks 'Uncertain'

From Chiswickw4.comParks Friends’ groups in the borough have made the Council aware of their disappointment with the lack of consultation over a major change in policy in a recent meeting.Following the surprise decision by Hounslow Council and Carillion to terminate the contract for parks’ maintenance seven months early representatives from seventeen of Hounslow’s Friends of Parks groups met on 15 November with Head of Parks Stefania Horne and lead cabinet member for Green Policy and Leisure Samia Chaudhary. The Friends’ groups were told how Hounslow’s Cabinet will meet to approve the future strategy for parks next Tuesday 21 November. They pointed out that, although they were pleased that the councillor in charge had met them collectively for the first time it gave them little time to work out the full ramifications of the move.Stefania Horne, following on the work of Consultants V4S, is recommending that Lampton 360, a wholly council-owned company currently responsible for waste collection and property development, take over maintenance contracts once Carillion finishes on 9 April 2018. This, explained Ms Horne, will help to meet the ambitious savings targets imposed on the parks service, and will also provide a more satisfactory solution than using a contractor. Lampton 360, she said, should be considered as an internal department, although with some advantages for Hounslow. Pension liabilities will be reduced using Lampton 360, and Lampton is permitted to trade, so it would be able to seek alternative sources of income generation. Quality supervision should be much improved.In the interim, there will be a working group comprising Carillion and parks’ staff to try to ensure that maintenance continues with ‘business as usual’. Groups expressed concerns about this ‘end of contract’ hiatus, especially with regard to events and Green Flag certification. The Parks Friends’ groups were not unhappy at the departure of Carillion, saying there had been much frustration with their work over the years. Ms Horne emphasised that this should be a new beginning and was a very good opportunity to improve the service. Lampton 360 would be ‘in-house’ but a separate company. Groups were invited to share in the process and Cllr Chaudhary invited groups to participate in the process. The Friends’ groups, however, felt that there were serious issues to consider, and not enough time to do it in. They said it remained unclear who would be responsible for work on a day-to-day basis and how it would be monitored. Concern was expressed that the new company would have to lease or buy all its new equipment, and that this would be subject to VAT, and more expensive than anticipated, causing further strain on the parks’ already restricted budgets. Also they requested that ecologists and horticulturalists to form part of the new teams.More wide-reaching concerns included the lack of experience of current Lampton directors who have no parks’ experience, but come from real estate, property development and waste industry backgrounds. The documents which formed the basis for Lampton’s incorporation specify the presence of councillors and the Chief Executive on the Board, but these have all resigned raising questions as to how directors are selected. The Friends requested a representative director on the Board. Cllr Chaudhary said she would take back this request.The issue of potential conflicts of interest was raised. Given that Lampton 360 is in the business of land development it was thought this may present a threat to Hounslow’s open space. The Lampton business plan of July 2016 says: “This will mean that at some point in the near future Development 360 will either need to be acquiring sites from the open market, or working with a Joint Venture partner to bring these sites forward or releasing and identifying more assets by way of release of Green Belt, or Metropolitan Open Land.” Ms Horne pointed out that planning permission would still be needed, but Friends remained anxious, especially given last week’s publication of the draft Local Plans, which state, “It is now necessary to consider the potential for release of green belt sites” and identifies sites in Bedfont, Hatton and Cranford for de-designation. On the question of whether the parks’ revenue would be ring-fenced and reinvested in the parks the Friends were told that it wouldn’t be but that at least this revenue would not become commercial profit, but would be retained by the council. This also raised the question of financial risk with any potential profits from external contracting work going to Lampton but losses having to be underwritten by the Council. Remuneration of directors was also raised and concerns were expressed about the unrealistic optimism of the budget. The Friends’ Groups say Lampton’s track record was not encouraging, with its new waste management scheme (budgeted £11.5m, actual now estimated £28.15m and climbing), and Facilities Management Lampton overspend potentially nearly £4million.Overall the Friends’ groups, while pleased about the opportunities for improvement following the departure of Carillion, were uncertain about the future of their parks under Lampton 360. They feared that the Council were rushing into a decision without due consideration, and that there were very serious structural questions about the Lampton 360 group of companies. Lampton’s aim to be “of the Council but different” left many questions unanswered: and no time to do so before next Tuesday.Councillor Samia Chaudhary said; “We believe there is an opportunity by doing this to maintain our parks to the same high standards, but also enable investment in new vehicles and equipment, and make savings of over £1 million per year.”“It is important to note that there will be no change to the ownership of the parks which will all continue to be owned, as now, by the Council. Lampton 360 will be contracted to undertake the operational services required in our parks on behalf of the Council.“This will help the council to deliver its promise to make Hounslow a cleaner, greener borough, encourage active and healthy communities, and provide quality services and value for money.”To contact the Park Friends Forum email; hounslowfriendsforum@gmail.com.November 17, 2017

Bernard Allen ● 2829d18 Comments ● 2774d

Hostile Streets

I see that Brentford gets some mention in the new GLA report :https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/hostile_streets_-_final_report_for_print.pdf"The most striking example of a hostile street we saw was near Brentford, where primary schools are straddled by the A4 and M4 flyover. We walked the route with parents and children, who showed us how difficult it was for them to get to school. They were worried about fast-moving traffic, high levels of pollution, and getting stuck in the middle of the busy road waiting for ages for a green light to cross.""2.25 In just three locations – Gallows Corner in Havering, Croydon Fiveways and a stretch of the A4 near Brentford – we came across:• A signed cycle route which was not completed and ran out midway down a 50mph road• A pedestrian crossing with a dropped kerb for wheelchairs and buggies, and tactile paving for people with visual impairments, on only one side of the road• A cycle lane which directs bikes onto oncoming traffic• Pavements and traffic islands which are too narrow or have street clutter that makes it difficult for wheelchairs and buggies• Busy, signalised junctions with no pedestrian phase in the lights• Traffic islands where pedestrians wait to cross surrounded by high volumes of fast-moving traffic• A pavement and crossing which were closed following a collision, when the issue "and page 20 has the Brentford photo titled "A cycle lane on the A4 directs bikes into three lanes of oncoming traffic"

Tim Henderson ● 2813d5 Comments ● 2809d

Get ready to start fighting to save your local park.

At a council cabinet meeting on 11th July there was an agenda item 14, REG 525 Parks Transformation https://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/documents/g9860/Public%20reports%20pack%20Tuesday%2011-Jul-2017%2018.00%20Cabinet.pdf?T=10If you scroll down to the pages relating to this item it says "Document is Restricted" In the decisions paper https://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/documents/g9860/Decisions%20Tuesday%2011-Jul-2017%2018.00%20Cabinet.pdf?T=2 it says that the recommendations in the report were approved.What recommendations? Clearly the public isn't supposed to know. The explanation for the exemption is;By Virtue of Paragraph 3 Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information)There have been rumours that parks management is to be handed over to Lampton 360 a set of companies set up by the council whose main aim is to develop property, they are also now running the waste contract. The suggestion being made is that is that maintenance is "coming back in house". Lampton 360 is a series of private companies and if the "business affairs" justification can be used to hide what it is doing, there are serious concerns about transparency and accountability.Where are our local councillors? What have they been doing to ensure there is proper consultation, scrutiny and debate before our parks are handed over to Lampton 360?Can any of our councillors throw any light on this mysterious agenda item?

Vanessa Smith ● 2952d14 Comments ● 2814d