Forum Topic

That's Andrew Michael John Atkinson the scourge of various local websites,try typing his name in the Ealing or Chiswick site searches. You'll note that he starts a thread with a provocative question and at the slightest disagreement with his views will start a tyrade of abuse against all and sundry, (well particularly ladies it seems to me). Now that is what I call not only provocative, but a disgusing state of affairs.As you are a stickler for accuracy, there is No "Y" in Tirade Mr WoodYes and I imagined that you were a lady too. Why is it that you throw mud about, suggesting that he starts a thread with a provocative heading. Now let me suggest to you some of what you call provocative threads he has postedAn Afghan Asylum seeker, demanding from the council a home for her and her 7 children, Their response was to offer a 5 bedroom house, not suitable for her though......so a 7 bedroom house was offered and accepted, because it had adequate parking space for her eldest son. Now I know that you are "loaded" Mr Wood, but none of your concerns were directed at the poor sods who have been waiting for years in inappropriate housing or B&B's........the rent for this home £12,500 a month, not to mention the other benefits. I will remind you that many pensioners are having to make a decision whether to heat their home or have a healthy nourishing meal..........provocative you say?Not forgetting the Afghan hijackers, who landed here, and who threatened to kill the passengers and crew unless they were allowed to stay........Yes Mr Wood, you've guessed it we housed them as well, on the last count only one had found work, and you could not make it up.......as a security officer!!!!!!! provocative Mr Wood, stuff those on the waiting list.I also mentioned that to ban police officers from belonging to the BNP was wrong........it is not as yet a proscribed organisation and are at the moment allowed to stand for election. The electorate can defeat them by challenging, and debating with them. I would like to ban the corrupt politicians who have had their nose in the troughs....2 of them have been mentioned by others on here, but that would be according to Mr Wood and Co be "provocative".I have asked the knowledgeable Mr Wood to give his opinion on this piece written in response to my thread on the spreading of "Cannabis farms" in the borough, I had actually seen the damage done.....£42,000 pounds worth on one particular house, and the police and the BBC reported that 75% were carried out by Vietnamese gang masters, the likes of Mr Wood and others of his ilk suggested that it was racist and irrelevant.....really. Mr Wood, will enlighten you on what he wants you to see, without producing evidence of "provocative" (his words) threads I have started.......yes some of the answers were in response to the example as below:-From The Ealing ForumTopic: Re:Cannabis Farms    Posted by: Sheila Davies-Brock Date/Time: 05/07/07 14:34:00  Andrew Michael John Atkinson you are such a card! LOL!  Victor Meldrew is alive and well and still hilarious.  All these international reprobates you encounter – wow!  A Vietnamese cannabis farm in Hounslow  -  Lordy, the mind boggles! Well Mr Wood, this is one of the clowns you omitted to mention.......you biased......nahTroll I well maybe...but I have never entered and taken over anyones property, simply because it happened to be empty, Try working it's good for the soul, and enables you to have some sort of pride in yourself.

Andrew Michael John Atkinson ● 6230d

There seems to be an implication in that latest posting from Tony Stavides that he is AMJA. A similar implication crept into one of his previous posts.I must admit, there are similarities between TS and AMJA, they both support Phil Andrews and they have a very right wing and xenophobic agenda. But having debated with AMJA in the local Times over many years, I am inclined to think that they are not the same person.AMJA was incredibly abusive and, I always found, very difficult to argue against - whereas I find Tony Stavides a walk-over. On a number of occasions in the 1990s, AMJA would attack my organisation (the Anti Nazi League) and accuse me - and them - of disrespecting our war dead, just because we propagated the anti-racist view that we did. He would accuse me of "abusing the free speech they fought and died for", yet he apparently feels that it's okay for the BNP to have as much freedom of expression as they like.I would retort that the war dead never appointed him as their spokesperson, but things got really nasty at one point and I complained to the editor (the late Malcolm Richards) for publishing his letters - seemingly without modification - whilst editing out the cutting rhetoric in my own.So I'm not convinced AMJA and Tony are the same, loathsome though both of them are.The general point I would make to both of them is this: it was by an incredible stroke of luck that you were born in a modern, industrialised country in the 20th century. We are all lucky in this regard. Why spend our entire lives bitching at the less fortunate just because they are trying to make a better life for themselves? It's just nasty, and most of all it's completely unecessary.We all enjoy the benefits of a health service, a minimum standard of living, an amazing degree of variety and choice, human rights (most of these things thanks to the Labour Party, I would argue) and yet those of us who should be counting our blessings can do nothing but hate others because they are different.Enjoy your life - it's short enough as it is - and cut out the incessant hate-mongering.

Robin Taylor ● 6230d

"he has voiced it, most of us disagree with it and we all think he is someone else.  Not really any more to be said."And they wonder why the BNP are getting support......this poster is typical of her ilk. What exactly is it you disagree with? She also acts as a spokesperson for everybody by her words "we all disagree with him". I will say it again,this is why we have been relegated to second or third class citizens......one of my concerns was the denial of treatment for a patient with terminal brain cancer, as it was not "cost effective",some women denied treatment for breast cancer, and this "person" who is adequately housed, probably has no medical problems,and if she has children they are in the school of her choice. So sod the rest of you...that's the mantra that these people continually spout...well madam you won't stop me from spouting MY concerns, and my message is if it annoys you... DON'T READ IT THEN IT WILL DISAPPEAR INTO THE ABBYSI am the only member of a family of six still alive,four died of cancer, one got good treatment in Hammersmith,the others got appalling treatment. My elderly mother was told she had lung cancer, while alone in her hospital bed, despite our request to wait until one of us could be with her.......this is what happens when we are told to be quiet and don't kick up a fuss. So you won't be surprised if I ignore yours and others request to only listen to your opinions. So carry on wioth your abuse,I can take it! You also apparently have no problem in giving an Afghan family a home costing £12.500 a month.....do you? Meanwhile pensioners can live on a pittance......don't you just love these generous, compassionate, and caring souls!

Tony Stavides ● 6224d

"*ahem* 'Go back to your squatty squat you crusty squatter Get a job! (I have one, thank you), bloody loony lefties, waffle waffle waffle, what about the troops THINK OF THE TROOPS! Bloody immigrants.'"I often wondered why I worked for 46 years,paid my taxes, and you demonstrate quite clearly with this latest offering, is that I would have been better off doing nothing. I feel really sorry for you,if this is the best you can do. The way our service people are treated is quite obviously of no concern to you, your thoughts and efforts are directed out across the English (is it English still?) Channel! But others will have noticed that not one of you have suggested exactly what I have written is in any way racist. As regards you and the "squatty squat" (your words) it was YOU who brought that in to the topic, with the idea, I presume was something to be proud of.....well lady, if you use your brain, that if this country had not continued with the open door policy to all and sundry, which as you have already indicated was something that you support, and you then may well have avoided the need to occupy someone else's property. Glad to hear that you are now gainfully employed........squatters are a pain in the a**e!Can I now take it that you and your ilk are still  unwilling/unable to quote any examples of my racist bigotry, but are not short on the ability to dish the dirt either. As I have told you before, "keep your door locked when you are not there, sqatters may like the look of it, and decide that their need is greater than yours"!

Tony Stavides ● 6223d

What you have done though yet again Robbo is be extremely selective in the rubbish you continue to spout from Southall and I suggest that if you cannot tell the whole story then you stick to your own Borough and bore the pants off them instead of us about your unhealthy obsession with the Champagne Socialist Parasite who unfortunately at the moment at least is our MP. For the record, I receive slightly more then you have quoted in allowances each year while I am on the Executive of Hounslow Council in which my portfolio is Lead Member for Community Safety, Community Engagement, and also Parking. I also am a member of various other committees including many involving race relations which I suspect sticks in your throat as you constantly imply I and my colleagues are racists and of course fight tooth and nail for the residents in Isleworth who I am proud to represent including a large amount of casework much of which I am informed Ann Keen has simply not responded to in the first instance. I am sure you have researched me thoroughly and so will be aware that both Isleworth and Syon wards have never received so much funding from both local Capital and S106 monies which in the past was diverted to the West of the Borough and not to where it was originally intended but we can thank John Chatt for that, and although I have no idea if I will be standing next May or even selected again I have an entirely clear conscience of serving Hounslow residents to the best of my ability regardless if they voted for me or my colleagues or have no intention of doing so which is more then can be said of the Keens. Cllr Connelly who I have always found to be a very hard working Councillor does not with the greatest respect to him no longer have the additional responsibilities so of course receives a lower allowance but perhaps you should be asking the Chairs and Vice Chairs of Hounslow Central and Heston and Cranford Area Committees why they continue to accept their additional £8000 a year each on top of their annual £9,700 when your Party were so allegedly against the increases? Oh I remember now, it was because they had budgeted for the increase when in Administration hadn't they which of course you choose to edit from your memory.

Paul Fisher ● 6222d

Attacks Sikhs for allegedly carrying knives and riding motorbikes without a helmet* Attacks the "rabble rousing Anti Nazi League"* Attacks "gypsies and travellers" for having access to GPs* Attacks a Bolivian for being granted permission to stay here* Attacks Afghan asylum seekers* Attacks "Vietnamese gang masters"* Says it was "wrong" to ban police officers from belonging to the BNP.Now Robbo has finally responded, let me respond in chronological order to his OTT remarks about “attacks”I asked if it was wise to allow a Sikh child on the DEMANDS (note DEMANDS!) of his father to bring a dagger into school. Also If is unsafe and the rest of us who are rightly prosecuted for riding a motorbike without a helmet, isn’t that discriminatory?I referred to the ANL as rabble rousers because they held no demonstrations against the hate preacher, and a certain Mr ABU HAMZA was preaching his hatred against the West while at the same time pocketing our cash. This took place regularly outside the Finsbury mosque, and I may add with the police seemingly unable/unwilling to intervene. Where were you all Robin?The Bolivian you mentioned and conveniently omitted to say that he was allowed to stay because he part owned a cat.Tell me where I have “attacked” Afghan asylum seekers, I objected to the rent of £12,500a month for the property, when there is a massive waiting list for housing and there were several 5 bedroom houses to let at least a third less than that. Do you condone that Robin?Don’t you “attack” Vietnamese” Gang masters, who are not only exploiting their own people, destroying peoples property, and they are supplying youngsters with drugs (Cannabis).What you cannot seem to grasp, is that we have a democratic system which permits any organisation to stand for election, and the BNP no matter how odious or distasteful they are, as long as it is not a proscribed organisation (perhaps your Mum Ann can get her government to do so) then problem solved. By the way, why not ban the cheating deceitful New Labour and Conservative parties as well. Now, you Robin and all the others who have suggested that it is “puerile and racist bile”Please feel free to criticise and justify your perceptions. Smart arse remarks have already been noted…….so let me know what I have got wrong OK? 

Tony Stavides ● 6222d